Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Pc Building Simulator
Simulation 2019

Pc Building Simulator

82%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
213 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
102 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
136 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
68 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
69 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
33 FPS
9.1ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 32,279
Graphics Card
Required 27,436
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 33 35 51 69
1440p QHD 68 69 95 136
1080p Full HD 102 110 149 213

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 110
1920x1080 Low 213
1920x1080 Medium 149
1920x1080 Ultra 102
2560x1440 High 69
2560x1440 Low 136
2560x1440 Medium 95
2560x1440 Ultra 68
3840x2160 High 35
3840x2160 Low 69
3840x2160 Medium 51
3840x2160 Ultra 33

Performance Analysis: Pc Building Simulator on Your System

The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the Intel Arc B580 occupies the 2851st position out of 3723 tested combinations for Pc Building Simulator. This places the combo in the lower-middle portion of the database’s tested configurations, indicating that while the hardware is far from the top of the performance hierarchy, it still delivers a playable experience in the majority of scenarios. The data suggests a system that is not designed to dominate the game’s most demanding settings at 4K, but rather one that offers a solid foundation for high-refresh-rate gaming at more common resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 2851 out of 3723 means that roughly 23% of tested configurations perform worse, while 77% perform better. This is a notable placement for a pairing of a 10-core, 16-thread CPU with a GPU that sits at the 68th percentile among all tested graphics cards. The CPU itself is stronger relative to its peers, ranking in the 83rd percentile, which suggests the processor is not the primary constraint in this pairing. The benchmark results indicate that the Arc B580’s performance ceiling, rather than the i5-14400F’s compute capabilities, is what limits the combo’s overall standing in this specific game.

When looking at the measured frame rates, the combo’s rank becomes clearer. At 1080p, the system easily clears the 60 FPS threshold at every preset, with the Ultra preset averaging 101.9 FPS. The 1440p results show a similar story, with all presets surpassing 60 FPS, including Ultra at 67.5 FPS. The 4K results, however, reveal the system’s limitations, as only the Low preset manages to stay above 60 FPS with an average of 68.5 FPS. This pattern of performance, where the system excels at lower resolutions but struggles at 4K with higher presets, explains the mid-pack ranking. The combo is not a top-tier performer, but it is also far from being unplayable, making it a reasonable middle-ground choice for gamers who prioritize resolution and settings flexibility over raw 4K capability.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Intel Core i5-14400F and the Intel Arc B580 shifts noticeably across resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU’s influence is at its peak, as the system achieves an average of 213.4 FPS on Low settings, which is 63.5 FPS higher than the 1440p Low result of 135.7 FPS. This massive jump when lowering resolution from 1440p to 1080p suggests that the GPU is not fully saturated at 1080p, allowing the CPU to push frame rates to very high levels. The i5-14400F, with its 16 threads and 4.70 GHz boost clock, is clearly capable of feeding the Arc B580 enough data to maintain these elevated frame rates.

As the resolution increases, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. Moving from 1080p Ultra at 101.9 FPS to 1440p Ultra at 67.5 FPS represents a 34% drop in performance, while the transition from 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra at 32.7 FPS is an even steeper 51% decline. This scaling indicates that the Arc B580’s 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 192-bit bus are being pushed to their limits at higher resolutions. The GPU’s 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 4K Ultra preset proves too demanding, suggesting that the graphics card’s raw throughput is the limiting factor in this scenario.

The preset scaling further confirms the GPU’s role. At 4K, the difference between Low and Ultra is 35.8 FPS (68.5 vs 32.7), which is a 52% performance swing. This large variance is typical of a GPU-bound situation, where the graphics card’s ability to handle increased shading and texture complexity directly impacts frame rates. The CPU’s role, by contrast, is more evident in the 1080p results, where the system maintains frame rates above 100 FPS even at Ultra settings. This suggests that for Pc Building Simulator, the i5-14400F is more than adequate for most gaming scenarios, and the Arc B580 is the component that determines whether the user can play at high settings or must compromise.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-14400F provide insight into what other CPUs might deliver similar results in this game. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is the closest match, with an average benchmark score that is only 0.1% higher than the i5-14400F’s average. This indicates that the two processors would produce nearly identical frame rates in Pc Building Simulator, assuming the GPU remains the same. The Intel Core i9-11900 is also a close contender, with a score 0.2% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i7-12800H rounds out the group with a score 0.5% higher. For users considering an upgrade or alternative, these CPUs would offer very similar performance characteristics, meaning the choice between them would likely come down to platform features rather than gaming performance in this specific title.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B580’s nearest rivals are a more diverse group. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP has an average score 0.2% lower, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 is 0.6% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, despite being a much higher-tier card in general, has a score that is 0.7% lower in this benchmark suite, which suggests that the Arc B580 performs comparably in certain workloads. The NVIDIA P106-100 is the outlier, with a score 1% lower. For Pc Building Simulator, these GPUs would likely produce similar frame rates to the Arc B580, although the specific driver optimizations and game engine quirks could cause minor variations. A user with an RTX 2080, for example, might expect nearly identical performance to the Arc B580, while an RTX 3080 owner might see slightly lower scores in some synthetic tests but could still achieve comparable gaming results.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Pc Building Simulator at 1080p?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14400F and Intel Arc B580 deliver an average of 101.9 FPS at 1080p Ultra settings, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. Even the most demanding preset is easily playable at this resolution.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 produces an average of 67.5 FPS, which is the highest quality setting that stays above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset also works at 69.1 FPS, but Ultra offers the best visual quality while remaining playable.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?

A: Only at Low settings, where the system averages 68.5 FPS at 3840x2160. The Medium preset drops to 51.3 FPS, High to 35.2 FPS, and Ultra to 32.7 FPS, all of which fall below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its rivals?

A: The i5-14400F’s average benchmark score is 32279, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i9-11900. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is 0.2% lower, and the Intel Core i7-12800H is 0.5% higher.

Q: What GPU performance can users expect relative to other cards?

A: The Arc B580’s average benchmark score is 23021, which is 0.6% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and 0.2% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 0.7% lower in this benchmark set.

Q: Does the game favor the CPU or GPU more at higher resolutions?

A: The data shows that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at 4K, where the difference between Low and Ultra presets is 35.8 FPS. At 1080p, the CPU has more influence, as evidenced by the 213.4 FPS average on Low settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the Intel Core i5-14400F and Intel Arc B580 produce the following average frame rates: Low settings yield 213.4 FPS, Medium produces 149.4 FPS, High achieves 110 FPS, and Ultra results in 101.9 FPS. All presets are far above the 60 FPS threshold, making 1080p an excellent resolution for this combo, with even the most demanding settings providing a smooth experience.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected decline. Low settings average 135.7 FPS, Medium delivers 95.3 FPS, High produces 69.1 FPS, and Ultra achieves 67.5 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is narrow at just 1.6 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset is only slightly more demanding than High at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the system’s limitations become apparent. Low settings average 68.5 FPS, which is just above the playable threshold. Medium drops to 51.3 FPS, High to 35.2 FPS, and Ultra to 32.7 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is severe, with the Ultra preset losing 34.8 FPS (from 67.5 to 32.7), indicating that the Arc B580 is not well-suited for 4K gaming at high quality settings. The min and max FPS values are not provided in the data, so the consistency of these frame rates cannot be assessed, but the averages paint a clear picture of the system’s capabilities.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding setting that maintains an average of 101.9 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. This makes Ultra the recommended choice for 1080p gaming, as it offers the best visual quality without sacrificing playability.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also qualifies as the best setting, with an average of 67.5 FPS. This is a close margin above the 60 FPS threshold, but it is still playable. Users who prefer a larger buffer might opt for High settings at 69.1 FPS, but the data shows that Ultra is a viable option.

For 3840x2160, the only preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, which averages 68.5 FPS. The Medium preset falls to 51.3 FPS, so users at 4K are limited to Low settings for a playable experience. This makes Low the best settings choice for 4K, despite the visual compromises involved.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i5-14400F and Intel Arc B580 can run Pc Building Simulator, but the experience varies significantly by resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, with the Ultra preset delivering 101.9 FPS, far exceeding the 60 FPS playable threshold. The 2560x1440 resolution is also playable at all presets, with Ultra achieving 67.5 FPS, although the margin above 60 FPS is slim. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset clears the threshold with 68.5 FPS, while Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 60 FPS. The verdict is clear: this combo is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but users seeking 4K performance will need to compromise significantly on visual quality. The data indicates that the Arc B580 is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the i5-14400F provides ample CPU performance for this simulation game.