Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Pc Building Simulator
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 86 | 89 | 126 | 176 |
| 1440p QHD | 165 | 173 | 242 | 313 |
| 1080p Full HD | 257 | 269 | 321 | 366 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Pc Building Simulator on Your System
Pc Building Simulator is a simulation title that rarely stresses high-end hardware, and the combination of the Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 delivers overwhelming performance that makes the game's demands almost trivial. The benchmark data shows this pairing achieves triple-digit average frame rates at every resolution tested, with even the most demanding Ultra preset at 4K staying far above the 60 FPS playability threshold. This is a case where the GPU's raw power, combined with a capable 10-core processor, creates a massive performance buffer that rivals would struggle to match, making this combo a top-tier choice for anyone wanting maximum frame rates in this specific simulation.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how this combination performs across standard resolutions and quality presets. At 3840x2160, the average frame rates are consistently high, with Low settings achieving 175.7 FPS, Medium producing 125.5 FPS, High reaching 89 FPS, and Ultra still delivering a very smooth 86.3 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra at 4K is relatively small at just 2.7 FPS, suggesting the Ultra preset's additional graphical effects are not heavily taxing on the RTX 5090's 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales significantly, showing the GPU has ample headroom. Low settings produce an exceptional 312.6 FPS, Medium jumps to 241.5 FPS, High maintains 173.1 FPS, and Ultra stays at a robust 165 FPS. The scaling from 4K to 1440p is notable; for example, Ultra settings improve by 78.7 FPS when moving down from 2160p, which indicates that the game is not bottlenecked by the CPU at these lower resolutions.
At 1920x1080, the frame rates become almost absurdly high, completely outpacing the refresh rates of most monitors. Low settings reach 365.7 FPS, Medium hits 321.3 FPS, High delivers 269.3 FPS, and Ultra still manages 256.7 FPS. The data reveals a pattern where the difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 109 FPS, but the absolute minimum average across all tested configurations is still 86.3 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All measurements are averages, as the FACT PACK does not include minimum or maximum frame rate data, but the sheer headroom suggests that even the most demanding scene transitions would not cause noticeable stutter.
FAQ
Q: Can this combination run Pc Building Simulator at 4K Ultra settings?
A: Yes, the measured data shows an average of 86.3 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, placing it well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the most demanding preset tested, and it still clears the threshold by a significant margin.
Q: How does the RTX 5090's performance in this game compare to its closest rivals?
A: The RTX 5090 has an average benchmark score of 79842, which is 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, 0.6% ahead of the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB, and 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT. However, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 80959, which is 1.4% higher than the RTX 5090 in synthetic benchmarks.
Q: Is the Intel Core i5-13400F a bottleneck for the RTX 5090 in this game?
A: The benchmark results indicate no significant CPU bottleneck. The i5-13400F scores 22604 in Cinebench R23 multicore and has a passmark multithread score of 25032, which is sufficient to feed the GPU. The high frame rates at 1080p, where CPU overhead is usually highest, confirm this pairing works efficiently.
Q: What is the best resolution and preset combination for maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness?
A: The verdict data lists Ultra as the best settings at every resolution. At 3840x2160, this yields 86.3 FPS; at 2560x1440, it yields 165 FPS; and at 1920x1080, it yields 256.7 FPS. There is no reason to lower settings for playability, as all configurations exceed 60 FPS.
Q: Does the game support high refresh rate monitors with this setup?
A: Yes, especially at 1440p and 1080p. At 2560x1440, even Ultra settings produce 165 FPS, which is sufficient for 165Hz monitors. At 1080p, all presets exceed 256 FPS, making the setup suitable for 240Hz or higher refresh rate displays.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations for this game?
A: The combo ranks 113rd out of 3723 tested combinations, placing it in the top 3% of all tested hardware pairings. This is a strong indication of its high performance in Pc Building Simulator specifically.
Best Settings per Resolution
Based on the measured FPS data, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at each resolution is Ultra for all three tested resolutions. At 3840x2160, Ultra settings achieve an average of 86.3 FPS, which is the highest quality preset tested and still provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows that High settings at 4K produce 89 FPS, but since Ultra is also playable, it is the recommended choice for maximum visual fidelity.
At 2560x1440, Ultra settings deliver 165 FPS on average, which is more than double the playable threshold. This resolution benefits from the GPU's massive memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s and 512-bit bus width, allowing for high-quality textures without performance penalties. The 165 FPS average also means that users with 144Hz or 165Hz monitors can experience fully smooth gameplay without needing to compromise on settings.
At 1920x1080, Ultra settings reach an average of 256.7 FPS, making this the best setting for players with high-refresh-rate displays. The performance difference between Ultra and High at 1080p is 12.6 FPS, but the absolute frame rate is so high that the choice between these presets becomes irrelevant for smoothness. For all resolutions, the verdict data explicitly lists Ultra as the best settings, confirming that there is no need to reduce quality to achieve playable frame rates.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 achieves a rank of 113 out of 3723 tested combinations in Pc Building Simulator. This places it in the top 3.03% of all tested hardware pairings, indicating exceptional performance for this specific game. The CPU's percentile rank of 77 among all CPUs and the GPU's percentile rank of 92 among all GPUs contribute to this high overall ranking, showing that both components are above average in their respective categories.
The ranking is particularly impressive given that the CPU is not a top-tier part, with an average benchmark score of 25292. This suggests that the game is heavily GPU-bound, allowing the RTX 5090's superior compute power to dominate. The GPU's average benchmark score of 79842 is nearly three times that of the CPU's average score, which explains why the combo performs so well despite the mid-range processor. For context, the combo outperforms many combinations that might have more expensive CPUs but less powerful GPUs, as the game's simulation nature relies more on graphical rendering than complex physics calculations.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Intel Core i5-13400F performs almost identically to several other processors in synthetic benchmarks. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS has an average score of 25284, which is a 0% delta from the i5-13400F's 25292. The Intel Core 5 120 scores 25362, representing a -0.3% delta, meaning it is slightly faster. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D also scores 25365, also a -0.3% delta, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25201, a 0.4% delta, indicating it is slightly slower. In practice, swapping the i5-13400F for any of these would result in nearly indistinguishable performance in Pc Building Simulator, as the game does not heavily depend on CPU threading.
For the GPU, the RTX 5090's closest rivals are the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, which scores 79605 (0.3% lower), the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB at 79396 (0.6% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT at 78940 (1.1% lower). The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 80959, which is 1.4% higher than the RTX 5090. These alternatives would provide similar frame rates in the game, though the RTX 5090's 32 GB of VRAM and newer Blackwell 2.0 architecture might offer better driver optimization for newer titles. For this specific simulation game, the performance differences among these GPUs would be minimal at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K Ultra, the RTX 5090's higher memory bandwidth could provide a slight edge.
The Verdict
The data clearly shows that this PC can run Pc Building Simulator exceptionally well at all tested resolutions and settings. At 3840x2160, the verdict lists High, Low, Medium, and Ultra as playable settings, with Ultra achieving 86.3 FPS and representing the best visual quality. At 2560x1440, all settings are playable, with Ultra at 165 FPS being the best choice. At 1920x1080, Ultra delivers 256.7 FPS, making it the best option for high-refresh-rate displays.
The combination clears the 60 FPS playable threshold by a wide margin in every tested configuration, with the lowest average being 86.3 FPS at 4K Ultra. This means users can enable maximum settings at any resolution without worrying about performance drops below playability. The RTX 5090's immense compute power, coupled with the i5-13400F's adequate multi-threading, ensures that Pc Building Simulator runs flawlessly, likely exceeding the frame rates of most monitors on the market. For anyone building a PC specifically for this game, this combination is overkill, but it provides a future-proof platform that will handle more demanding titles with equal ease.