Pc Building Simulator

The Intel Core i5-12400F and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a playable experience in Pc Building Simulator, but the headroom varies dramatically by resolution. At 1080p, this pairing is overkill, delivering over 90 FPS even at the highest preset. At 1440p, it remains solidly above the 60 FPS threshold at High settings. The equation changes at 4K, where the combo struggles to maintain smooth performance except at the lowest settings. The data indicates a system that is well-balanced for mainstream gaming but hits a clear ceiling when pixel count increases.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system performs exceptionally well across all presets. The Low preset produces an average of 192 FPS, which is more than three times the playable threshold. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 136 FPS, with a minimum of 115 FPS and a maximum of 156 FPS. High settings yield 96 FPS average, while Ultra still manages a strong 91 FPS average. The gap between Low and Ultra is roughly 101 FPS, showing that even the most demanding settings leave substantial performance on the table.

Stepping up to 2560x1440, the numbers become more moderate but remain playable. Low settings produce a 121 FPS average, which is still double the 60 FPS target. Medium follows at 86 FPS average, with a minimum of 73 FPS and a maximum of 99 FPS. High settings sit at 61 FPS average, which is just barely above the playable threshold. Ultra drops to 58 FPS average, falling short of the 60 FPS line by a narrow margin. The transition from Low to Ultra at this resolution costs 63 FPS on average, indicating that the GPU is becoming the limiting factor.

At 3840x2160, the performance picture shifts significantly. Low settings produce a 63 FPS average, which is the only preset that clears the playable threshold. Medium settings fall to 45 FPS average, with a minimum of 38 FPS and a maximum of 52 FPS. High settings drop further to 32 FPS average, and Ultra bottoms out at 30 FPS average. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K represents a 33 FPS loss, which is a steep penalty for visual quality. The minimum frame rates at Medium indicate that the system can experience noticeable hitches, as the 38 FPS low point is well below the average.

The frame rate scaling across resolutions shows a consistent pattern. At 1080p High, the average is 96 FPS; at 1440p High, it drops to 61 FPS; and at 4K High, it falls to 32 FPS. This represents a 67% reduction from 1080p to 4K at the same settings. The Medium preset follows a similar trajectory, going from 136 FPS at 1080p to 86 FPS at 1440p and 45 FPS at 4K. The Low preset is the most resilient, dropping from 192 FPS at 1080p to 121 FPS at 1440p and 63 FPS at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-12400F and Intel Arc B570 combination ranks 2997 out of 3723 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places the system in the lower portion of the database, which is surprising given the strong 1080p performance. The rank reflects the fact that many tested configurations include higher-end GPUs that can handle 4K Ultra settings, which this combo cannot. However, percentile data for the individual components shows a different story.

The CPU sits at the 73rd percentile when compared to all tested processors, indicating it outperforms a majority of alternatives. The GPU lands at the 65th percentile among all tested graphics cards. When combined, these components produce a system that is competent but not exceptional in the broader context of the database. The rank suggests that while the combo handles 1080p and 1440p well, it is outclassed by configurations with more powerful GPUs at higher resolutions.

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the i5-12400F scores 19039 on average, which is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS at 19047, a delta of 0%. The Intel Core 3 201E scores 19056, which is 0.1% higher, and the Intel Core i5-1335U scores 18982, which is 0.3% lower. These small deltas indicate that the i5-12400F is competitively positioned within its performance tier. For the GPU, the Arc B570 scores 20556 on average, compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20534, a delta of 0.1%. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, which is 0.1% higher, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, which is 0.5% higher. The GPU is closely matched with its nearest rivals, showing that it delivers performance consistent with its class.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Intel Core i5-12400F and the Intel Arc B570 changes as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the CPU has more influence on frame rates because the GPU can produce frames faster than the processor can feed it data. The 192 FPS average at Low settings suggests that the CPU is capable of driving high frame rates, and the GPU is the limiting factor even at this resolution. The drop from Low to Ultra at 1080p, from 192 FPS to 91 FPS, indicates that the GPU is responsible for the performance loss as graphical demands increase.

At 2560x1440, the GPU becomes more dominant. The frame rates at Low settings drop to 121 FPS, which is still high, but the scaling between presets shows a clear GPU bottleneck. The 58 FPS average at Ultra is a 52% reduction from the Low preset, demonstrating that the GPU is struggling to maintain performance as settings increase. The CPU still has enough headroom to support these frame rates, as evidenced by the 121 FPS at Low, but the GPU is the component that determines the final output.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is almost entirely the limiting factor. The 63 FPS average at Low settings shows that even the least demanding preset taxes the GPU heavily. The drop to 30 FPS at Ultra represents a 52% reduction, and the minimum frame rates at Medium (38 FPS) suggest that the GPU cannot maintain consistent performance under load. The CPU has minimal influence at this resolution, as the GPU is saturated by the pixel count. The data shows that the i5-12400F provides adequate processing power for this game, but the Arc B570 dictates playability at higher resolutions.

The scaling between resolutions and presets highlights the GPU's role. At 1080p Medium, the average is 136 FPS; at 1440p Medium, it is 86 FPS; and at 4K Medium, it is 45 FPS. This 67% reduction from 1080p to 4K is consistent across presets, confirming that the GPU is the primary driver of performance changes. The CPU's performance, as measured by benchmarks like the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380, indicates it has sufficient single-thread and multi-thread capabilities for this simulation game, but the GPU is what determines whether the game runs smoothly.

The Verdict

This PC can run Pc Building Simulator at all tested resolutions, but the playable settings vary. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold at every preset, with the Ultra setting delivering a 91 FPS average. This means users can enable the highest visual quality without sacrificing smooth gameplay. At 2560x1440, the system maintains 60 FPS at Low, Medium, and High settings, with High producing a 61 FPS average. The Ultra preset falls short at 58 FPS, so users should stick with High for a consistent experience.

At 3840x2160, the system only clears the 60 FPS threshold at Low settings, which produces a 63 FPS average. All other presets fall below the line: Medium at 45 FPS, High at 32 FPS, and Ultra at 30 FPS. The verdict is clear: 4K gaming is only viable with reduced graphical settings. For users who prioritize visual fidelity at 4K, this combo will not deliver a satisfying experience. The data shows that the system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it offers a wide range of playable settings.

The minimum frame rates at Medium settings provide additional context. At 1080p, the minimum is 115 FPS, which is well above the threshold. At 1440p, the minimum is 73 FPS, still comfortably above 60. At 4K, the minimum drops to 38 FPS, which indicates stuttering during demanding scenes. This reinforces the conclusion that 4K is only playable at Low settings, where the average stays above the threshold but the lack of min/max data for that preset leaves some uncertainty.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the most comfortable resolution, with all presets exceeding 60 FPS. The Ultra preset delivers a 91 FPS average, making it the recommended choice for a smooth experience.

Q: Can this system handle 1440p gaming?

A: Yes, at 2560x1440, the High preset produces a 61 FPS average, which clears the playable threshold. Medium offers 86 FPS average, and Low provides 121 FPS average, giving users multiple viable options.

Q: Is 4K playable with this hardware?

A: Only at Low settings, where the average FPS is 63. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 60 FPS, with averages of 45, 32, and 30 respectively, so 4K requires significant graphical compromises.

Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc B570 scores 20556 on average, which is 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and 0.1% lower than the Intel Arc A750. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, which is 0.5% higher.

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400F ranks at the 73rd percentile among all tested CPUs, indicating it outperforms most processors in the database. This places it slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, which has an average score of 19047 versus 19039.

Q: What frame rates can users expect at 1080p Medium?

A: The average is 136 FPS, with a minimum of 115 FPS and a maximum of 156 FPS. This provides a very smooth experience with no risk of dropping below the 60 FPS threshold.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering a 91 FPS average. This is the most demanding setting that stays above 60 FPS, and it offers the highest visual quality without sacrificing performance. The system has enough headroom to run all settings at this resolution, so users can maximize graphical fidelity.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is the most demanding option that maintains 60 FPS, with a 61 FPS average. The Ultra preset falls to 58 FPS, so High is the recommended setting for the best balance of quality and performance. Users who prefer higher frame rates can choose Medium, which delivers an 86 FPS average.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only option that clears the 60 FPS threshold, with a 63 FPS average. This is the best setting for 4K gaming, as all higher presets fall below the playable line. The Medium preset offers a 45 FPS average, which may be acceptable for some users, but it does not meet the standard playable threshold. For a consistent 60 FPS experience at 4K, Low settings are required.