Pc Building Simulator

The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 presents a clear picture for Pc Building Simulator: this is a high-refresh-rate powerhouse at 1080p and 1440p, and a capable 4K performer that just misses the 60 FPS mark at the highest preset. The data, measured across twelve resolution and settings combinations, shows a system that is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions but exhibits remarkable scaling headroom at lower ones. While the combo ranks in the 920th position out of 3723 tested combinations, its practical performance in this specific simulation title is far more impressive than that mid-pack ranking suggests.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete map of what to expect, with all values representing average frame rates. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance across the board. Low settings produce a staggering 348.9 FPS, which drops to 261.2 FPS at Medium, 182.9 FPS at High, and 172.8 FPS at Ultra. The gap between High and Ultra is relatively modest at 10.1 FPS, indicating diminishing returns at the top end. This resolution is clearly where the RTX 4070 has the most headroom, with even the most demanding preset nearly tripling the 60 FPS threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the system remains highly capable but shows the expected performance reduction from the increased pixel count. Low settings yield 230.5 FPS, Medium delivers 163.1 FPS, High comes in at 119 FPS, and Ultra still manages 110.7 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is consistent, with Ultra dropping by 62.1 FPS, which represents a 35.9% reduction. This is a typical pattern for a GPU-bound scenario, where the additional pixel workload directly impacts frame generation.

At 3840x2160, the performance curve steepens considerably. Low settings produce 121 FPS, Medium delivers 86.8 FPS, and High drops to 59.2 FPS. Ultra, interestingly, performs better than High at 60.8 FPS, which is an anomaly worth noting. This inversion suggests that the Ultra preset may be leveraging different rendering paths or optimization strategies that favor the RTX 4070's architecture. The key takeaway is that 4K Ultra sits right at the playable threshold, while High falls just below it. The resolution scaling from 1440p to 4K is severe: Ultra drops from 110.7 FPS to 60.8 FPS, a 45.1% decline.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear division of labor between the Intel Core i5-12400 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070. At 1080p, the frame rates are so high across all presets that the CPU's single-thread performance becomes the limiting factor. The i5-12400's 3dmark_single_thread score of 910 and passmark_single_thread score of 3456 indicate strong per-core capability, but at 348.9 FPS on Low settings, the CPU is likely near its practical rendering ceiling. The relatively small drop from Low to Medium (87.7 FPS) compared to the larger drop from Medium to High (78.3 FPS) suggests the GPU starts taking over as settings increase.

At 1440p, the GPU begins to assert its dominance. The RTX 4070's 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth become the primary drivers. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a consistent reduction across all presets, which is the hallmark of GPU-bound rendering. The i5-12400's six cores and twelve threads, with a cinebench_r23_multicore score of 15989, provide ample processing power for the game's simulation logic, but the frame rates are dictated by the GPU's pixel-pushing capability.

At 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The 192-bit memory bus and 12 GB of GDDR6X memory are working hard to maintain playable frame rates. The anomaly where Ultra beats High (60.8 vs 59.2 FPS) supports this interpretation, as the higher preset may be using a more efficient memory access pattern. The CPU's role diminishes further, with its cinebench_r15_multicore score of 1611 and passmark_multithread score of 18747 being more than sufficient for the game's processing demands. The i5-12400's 3dmark_16_threads score of 5873 and 3dmark_max_threads score of 5890 show that it can handle concurrent workloads without becoming a constraint.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's ranking of 920 out of 3723 tested combinations places it in the 75.3rd percentile of all tested systems for Pc Building Simulator. This is a respectable position, but the raw performance numbers suggest the ranking may be conservative. The i5-12400's avgBenchmarkScore of 18683 places it at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD EPYC 7643 (avgScore 18697, deltaPct -0.1) and Intel Core i7-1355U (avgScore 18730, deltaPct -0.3). The CPU is essentially performance-equivalent to these far more expensive or mobile-oriented parts.

The RTX 4070's avgBenchmarkScore of 37648 places it at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (avgScore 37628, deltaPct 0.1) and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (avgScore 37507, deltaPct 0.4). The GPU outperforms the Radeon RX Vega 56 by 0.4% and the Tesla P4 by 0.1%, while trailing the RTX 4080 Mobile by 1.3%. This positions the RTX 4070 as a solid upper-midrange part that trades blows with workstation and older flagship cards.

The combo ranking being outside the top quartile likely reflects the inclusion of systems with more powerful CPUs or GPUs, but for this specific game, the measured FPS data shows the combination punches above its percentile weight. The 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 3854 for the GPU and the passmark_g3d score of 26927 confirm the card's DirectX 12 capabilities, which align with the game's requirements.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Pc Building Simulator at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, but barely. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 60.8 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold by 0.8 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that remains playable at 4K, and any future updates or background processes could push it below the threshold.

Q: What is the best resolution to play at for maximum visual quality?

A: The 2560x1440 resolution at Ultra settings provides the best balance, delivering 110.7 FPS. This is 81.8% higher than the 4K Ultra result and maintains a 50.7 FPS headroom above the playable threshold, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 4070's avgBenchmarkScore of 37648 is 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37628) and 0.4% higher than the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37507). It trails the RTX 4080 Mobile (38135) by 1.3%, showing it sits in a competitive mid-to-high range.

Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck for this game?

A: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU is not a bottleneck for the GPU. The i5-12400's cinebench_r23_multicore score of 15989 and passmark_multithread score of 18747 provide ample headroom. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, as evidenced by the steep frame rate drops from 1440p.

Q: Why does 4K Ultra perform better than 4K High?

A: The measured data shows 4K Ultra at 60.8 FPS versus 4K High at 59.2 FPS. This 1.6 FPS difference is within measurement variance but may indicate that the Ultra preset uses different rendering techniques that better utilize the RTX 4070's architecture, such as more efficient memory transactions.

Q: What is the highest FPS achievable with this combo?

A: The maximum measured FPS is 348.9 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This demonstrates the system's capability for extreme high-refresh-rate gaming, though most players will prefer the visual quality of higher presets.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the system can run Ultra settings at 172.8 FPS, which is the most demanding preset and provides the best visual quality while maintaining a 112.8 FPS headroom above the playable threshold. This makes 1080p Ultra the clear recommendation for competitive or high-refresh-rate play.

At 2560x1440, Ultra settings deliver 110.7 FPS, which remains the best choice. The 50.7 FPS headroom above 60 FPS ensures smooth gameplay even during complex scenes with many components on screen. High settings at 119 FPS offer a marginal 8.3 FPS improvement, but the visual quality trade-off is not worth the small gain.

At 3840x2160, Ultra settings are the only high-quality option that clears 60 FPS, with a measured 60.8 FPS. Medium settings provide more comfort at 86.8 FPS, which may be preferable for players who want a larger safety margin. Low settings at 121 FPS are available for those prioritizing frame rate over visual fidelity.

The Verdict

The verdict is clear: this system can run Pc Building Simulator successfully at every resolution tested, but the experience varies significantly. At 3840x2160, the playable settings are Low, Medium, and Ultra, with Ultra being the best setting at 60.8 FPS. This means 4K gaming requires either accepting the Ultra preset's slim margin or dropping to Medium for a more comfortable 86.8 FPS.

At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, with Ultra delivering 110.7 FPS. This is the sweet spot for this combination, offering high visual quality with substantial frame rate headroom. At 1920x1080, every preset is playable, with Ultra at 172.8 FPS providing the best experience for high-refresh-rate displays.

The practical advice is to target 1440p Ultra for the best balance of visual fidelity and performance. The 4K Ultra experience is viable but leaves no room for error, so players with 4K displays should consider Medium settings for a more robust experience. This combo demonstrates that a mid-range CPU paired with a strong GPU can deliver excellent results in simulation titles, with the RTX 4070's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth proving more than sufficient for the game's demands.