Pc Building Simulator

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i5-10400F sits in a dense cluster of nearby processors according to the database's average benchmark scores. Its average score of 14185 places it within a narrow band of comparable silicon. The Intel Xeon 6756E scores 14163, a delta of just 0.2% below the i5-10400F. The Intel Core 7 160UL is 0.3% ahead with 14232, while the AMD EPYC 7552 trails by 0.5% at 14115. The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C leads this group slightly, posting 14277, which is 0.6% higher than the i5-10400F. These four alternatives all fall within roughly one percentage point of each other, meaning any of them would deliver effectively indistinguishable CPU-bound performance in Pc Building Simulator. The i5-10400F ranks in the 68th percentile among all CPUs, so it is a mid-to-upper tier processor, not a flagship but comfortably above the median.

For the GPU side, the Intel Arc B370 is a much more unusual entry. Its average benchmark score of 1184 lands it in the 5th percentile among all GPUs, which is extremely low. The nearest rivals are all legacy or low-end parts. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, just 0.2% higher. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 posts 1190, a 0.5% advantage. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M reaches 1192, 0.7% ahead. The AMD FirePro M2000 is the only rival that scores lower, at 1168, which is 1.4% behind the Arc B370. These deltas are tiny, so any of these GPUs would behave nearly identically in this game. The Arc B370 is effectively a low-end integrated-class part despite its modern architecture, and its performance envelope is defined by that 5th percentile ranking. Users coming from any of those older Radeon or FirePro parts would see essentially the same frame rates.

The CPU and GPU are mismatched in tier. The processor is a solid 68th percentile component, while the graphics solution is near the bottom of the database. In Pc Building Simulator, which is not a demanding title by modern standards, the GPU becomes the limiting factor for higher settings, while the CPU has ample headroom.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Pc Building Simulator at 1920x1080 with Medium settings?

A: Yes. The measured average frame rate at 1920x1080 with Medium settings is 80 FPS, with a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS. This clears the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable preset at 2560x1440?

A: At 2560x1440, only the Low preset is playable, averaging 71 FPS. Medium drops to 50 FPS, High falls to 36 FPS, and Ultra is at 34 FPS. None of those clear the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Is 4K playable on this hardware?

A: No. At 3840x2160, every measured preset fails to reach 60 FPS. Low averages 37 FPS, Medium averages 26 FPS, High averages 19 FPS, and Ultra averages 18 FPS. The verdict data lists no playable settings at this resolution.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: This CPU and GPU pairing ranks 3436 out of 3723 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. That places it in the lower portion of the database, roughly in the 8th percentile of all combinations.

Q: What is the highest FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 113 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The maximum frame rate ever observed in any run was 92 FPS, which occurred at 1920x1080 with Medium settings.

Q: Does the Arc B370 have dedicated VRAM?

A: No. The memory configuration is listed as "System Shared" for size, type, and bus width. Bandwidth is described as "System Dependent," meaning it relies on shared system memory rather than dedicated graphics memory.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database contains measured frame rates for twelve combinations of resolution and settings. All figures are recorded averages unless otherwise noted.

At 3840x2160, the results are uniformly below the playable threshold. Low settings produce an average of 37 FPS. Medium settings drop to 26 FPS, with a minimum of 22 and a maximum of 30. High settings average 19 FPS. Ultra settings average 18 FPS. None of these approach 60 FPS, and even the best case at Low is barely more than half the target.

At 2560x1440, the picture improves but remains constrained. Low settings deliver 71 FPS on average, which is the only playable result at this resolution. Medium settings average 50 FPS, with a minimum of 43 and a maximum of 58. High settings fall to 36 FPS. Ultra settings average 34 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is substantial, a 21 FPS drop, suggesting a steep scaling curve as graphical features are enabled.

At 1920x1080, the combo becomes genuinely usable. Low settings produce an average of 113 FPS, which is the highest average recorded across all tests. Medium settings average 80 FPS, with a minimum of 68 and a maximum of 92. High settings average 56 FPS, just under the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra settings average 54 FPS. The pattern shows that Medium is the sweet spot for 1080p, offering 80 FPS average with a minimum that stays above 60.

The data reveals a consistent trend: the Arc B370's performance scales steeply with resolution and settings. The difference between 1080p Low and 4K Ultra is enormous, from 113 FPS down to 18 FPS. The CPU is not the bottleneck in any of these results; the GPU's shared memory and low pixel throughput dominate the frame rate outcomes.

The Verdict

This PC can run Pc Building Simulator, but only under specific conditions. The verdict data defines playable as maintaining an average of at least 60 FPS. At 1920x1080, the system clears that bar with Low and Medium settings. Medium is the best playable preset, averaging 80 FPS. High and Ultra both fall short, with 56 FPS and 54 FPS respectively.

At 2560x1440, only Low settings are playable, averaging 71 FPS. Medium drops to 50 FPS, which is below the threshold. At 3840x2160, no settings are playable. The best result at 4K is Low at 37 FPS, which is far from smooth.

For users targeting 1080p, this combo is acceptable for moderate settings. For 1440p, it requires dropping to Low. For 4K, it is not viable. The Arc B370's 5th percentile GPU ranking and shared memory architecture limit the system to lower-end configurations. The i5-10400F is not the limiting factor; its 68th percentile CPU ranking provides ample processing power for this simulation genre. The bottleneck is entirely on the graphics side.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database's collection of tested PC combinations for Pc Building Simulator, this specific pairing ranks 3436 out of 3723. That places it in the bottom 8% of all tested combos. The rank reflects the Arc B370's severe GPU limitation, not the CPU. The i5-10400F is a mid-tier processor, but the graphics solution drags the overall combination down.

The practical implication is that most other tested combinations will outperform this one. The 287 combos ranked below this pairing are likely using even weaker GPUs or CPUs. For a game like Pc Building Simulator, which is not graphically intensive, this low rank is notable because even modest hardware should handle the title. The Arc B370's shared memory and 25 W TDP indicate a power-sipping part designed for portability, not gaming performance. Users should expect this combo to deliver only entry-level results, and the measured FPS data confirms that expectation.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium. The average frame rate is 80 FPS, with a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS. This is the recommended configuration for 1080p. High settings average 56 FPS, which misses the threshold, and Ultra averages 54 FPS. Low settings are also playable at 113 FPS, but Medium offers a substantial visual upgrade while still maintaining a comfortable margin above 60 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the only playable preset is Low, averaging 71 FPS. Medium drops to 50 FPS, so it cannot be recommended. The jump from Low to Medium costs 21 FPS, which is a steep penalty for the visual improvements. Users at 1440p must accept Low settings to maintain smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, there is no playable preset. The closest option is Low at 37 FPS, which is well below the 60 FPS target. Medium averages 26 FPS, High averages 19 FPS, and Ultra averages 18 FPS. None of these are viable for a playable experience. Users attempting 4K should consider lowering the resolution or upgrading the GPU.

The recommended settings per resolution are therefore: 1080p Medium at 80 FPS, 1440p Low at 71 FPS, and no recommendation for 4K. The data shows a clear ceiling for this hardware, and the best experience is firmly at 1080p with moderate settings.