Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Pc Building Simulator
Simulation 2019

Pc Building Simulator

68%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
346 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
175 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
232 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
110 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
121 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
58 FPS
5.4ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 13,494
Graphics Card
Required 27,436
Your GPU 37,648

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 58 61 86 121
1440p QHD 110 116 164 232
1080p Full HD 175 184 260 346

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 184
1920x1080 Low 346
1920x1080 Medium 260
1920x1080 Ultra 175
2560x1440 High 116
2560x1440 Low 232
2560x1440 Medium 164
2560x1440 Ultra 110
3840x2160 High 61
3840x2160 Low 121
3840x2160 Medium 86
3840x2160 Ultra 58

Performance Analysis: Pc Building Simulator on Your System

This combo, an Intel Core i3-12100F paired with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, demonstrates a substantial performance ceiling for Pc Building Simulator. The data places this pairing at rank 929 out of 3723 tested combinations, placing it comfortably within the upper quartile of all systems. This ranking, combined with the measured frame rates, suggests that the configuration is far more capable than the game's simulation genre typically demands, offering headroom for high refresh rate displays and maximum graphical fidelity.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame of 929 out of 3723 combos places this system in the top 25% of all tested configurations for Pc Building Simulator. This is a strong position, indicating that the hardware pairing is well above the median system tested for this title. The percentile rankings of the individual components support this: the CPU sits at the 68th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 81st percentile against all GPUs. This suggests that the graphics card is the more dominant component in this pairing, a factor that becomes particularly relevant at higher resolutions where GPU load increases.

The data implies that this system is not just barely crossing the playable threshold, but rather it is built to obliterate it. With a playableThresholdFps of 60, the measured average frame rates at 1080p and 1440p are multiple times higher than this baseline. Even at 4K, the system manages to keep the average frame rate essentially at the threshold with High settings. This rank, therefore, signifies a system that will not struggle with this game's workload, providing a smooth and responsive experience across a wide range of settings.

Best Settings per Resolution

The measured data reveals a clear hierarchy of playable settings for each resolution, all based on maintaining an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, achieving an average of 61 FPS. While Ultra settings dip to 58 FPS on average, High is the optimal choice for a consistent 60+ FPS experience. Medium settings provide a more comfortable margin with an average of 86 FPS, and Low jumps to 121 FPS.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the system has enough headroom to run the most demanding preset, Ultra, at an average of 110 FPS. This is the best settings choice as it fully utilizes the hardware without any concern for dropping below the playable threshold. All other settings—High, Medium, and Low—also clear 60 FPS easily, with averages of 116, 164, and 232 FPS respectively.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the story is similar to 1440p. The best settings are Ultra, which delivers an impressive average of 175 FPS. This indicates the game is heavily GPU-bound at this resolution, but the RTX 4070 has ample power to spare. The lower presets yield extreme frame rates, with Low settings reaching 346 FPS on average, showcasing the system's ability to support very high refresh rate monitors.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate a shifting balance between CPU and GPU influence depending on the resolution. At 1080p, the system is likely more CPU-bound, as the GPU can render frames so quickly that the processor becomes the limiting factor. This is evident in the scaling from 1080p to 1440p, where the average FPS at Ultra drops from 175 to 110, a significant 37% decrease. This large drop suggests that the GPU is starting to become more of a bottleneck as the pixel count increases.

The scaling from 1440p to 4K is less severe but still substantial. At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 110 to 58, a 47% reduction. This continued steep decline at 4K reinforces the idea that the GPU is the primary driver of performance at higher resolutions. The CPU, an Intel Core i3-12100F with 4 cores and 8 threads, appears to be sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p and 1440p, but the RTX 4070's workload becomes the dominant factor as resolution increases.

The data shows that the RTX 4070 is the star of this show for Pc Building Simulator. While the i3-12100F is a capable processor, its role is to keep up with the GPU. At 4K Ultra, the system falls just short of the 60 FPS target, indicating that the GPU's limits are being reached. The CPU is not the primary constraint at this resolution; rather, it is the raw pixel-pushing power of the graphics card that dictates the final frame rate.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Intel Core i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13494. Its nearest rivals, based on the data, include the Intel Core 3 N355 with an avgScore of 13492 (a 0% difference) and the Intel Core i5-9500 with an avgScore of 13452 (a 0.3% difference). This indicates that a system with either of these processors would perform nearly identically to the i3-12100F in this game, as their overall processing power is within a negligible margin. The Intel Core 5 120UL (avgScore 13594) is slightly faster by 0.7%, while the Intel Core i7-1250U (avgScore 13351) is slightly slower by 1.1%.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 has an average benchmark score of 37648. The closest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla P4 with an avgScore of 37628, showing a 0.1% difference, making it a near-identical performer in terms of raw compute. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (avgScore 37507) is also very close, being only 0.4% slower. This suggests that a system using either of these graphics cards would produce very similar frame rates in Pc Building Simulator. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is 1.3% faster (avgScore 38135), while the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 is 1.3% slower (avgScore 37157).

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Pc Building Simulator at 4K with High settings?

A: Yes. The measured data shows an average of 61 FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings, which is just above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest settings preset that achieves 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: The Ultra preset is playable at 2560x1440, with an average frame rate of 110 FPS, clearing the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13494. The Intel Core 3 N355 scores 13492 (0% difference) and the Intel Core i5-9500 scores 13452 (0.3% difference), indicating near-identical performance.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU more important for this game at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the GPU is very capable at 1080p, with frame rates exceeding 175 FPS on Ultra. The performance drop when moving to 1440p indicates the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor as resolution increases.

Q: What GPU is the closest performer to the RTX 4070?

A: The NVIDIA Tesla P4 has an average score of 37628 compared to the RTX 4070's 37648, a delta of just 0.1%, making it the closest rival in terms of benchmark performance.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The measured data shows an average of 260 FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, with a minimum of 221 FPS and a maximum of 299 FPS.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Pc Building Simulator exceptionally well. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 3840x2160, the system is playable with High, Medium, and Low settings, with High being the best at 61 FPS average. At 2560x1440, all four settings presets are playable, with Ultra being the best choice at 110 FPS average. At 1920x1080, the system excels, running Ultra at 175 FPS average. The only setting that fails to clear the 60 FPS threshold is 4K Ultra, which averages 58 FPS. For any gamer with a 1080p or 1440p monitor, this system provides a flawless, high-refresh-rate experience. For 4K users, a small compromise to High settings is all that is needed for a smooth 60 FPS experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

3840x2160 (4K)

  • Ultra: The average FPS is 58, which falls just below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
  • High: The average FPS is 61, making it the most demanding playable setting at this resolution.
  • Medium: The average FPS is 86, with a minimum of 73 and a maximum of 99 FPS, providing a stable and fluid experience.
  • Low: The average FPS is 121, offering a significant performance boost for high refresh rate 4K displays.

2560x1440 (1440p)

  • Ultra: The average FPS is 110, well above the playable threshold and the best setting for a smooth experience.
  • High: The average FPS is 116, showing that the GPU has headroom even at this resolution.
  • Medium: The average FPS is 164, with a minimum of 140 and a maximum of 189 FPS, ensuring very consistent frame pacing.
  • Low: The average FPS is 232, which is an excellent result for esports-level responsiveness.

1920x1080 (1080p)

  • Ultra: The average FPS is 175, delivering a fantastic high-refresh-rate experience.
  • High: The average FPS is 184, showing minimal performance difference between High and Ultra.
  • Medium: The average FPS is 260, with a minimum of 221 and a maximum of 299 FPS, pushing into very high refresh rate territory.
  • Low: The average FPS is 346, a result that will maximize even the fastest 360Hz monitors.