Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Pc Building Simulator
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 18 | 19 | 26 | 37 |
| 1440p QHD | 34 | 36 | 50 | 71 |
| 1080p Full HD | 54 | 56 | 80 | 113 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Pc Building Simulator on Your System
Measured FPS Breakdown
The recorded data for this AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and Intel Arc B370 combination shows a performance profile that is heavily dependent on both resolution and graphics preset. At 3840x2160, the measured average frame rates are consistently low across all settings. The Ultra preset averages 18 FPS, High averages 19 FPS, and Medium averages 26 FPS with a measured minimum of 22 FPS and maximum of 30 FPS. Low settings at 4K produce an average of 37 FPS, which is the only 4K result that approaches a playable range, though it still falls short of the 60 FPS threshold.
Moving to 2560x1440, the averages improve substantially. Low settings deliver an average of 71 FPS, while Medium produces 50 FPS with a minimum of 43 FPS and maximum of 58 FPS. High averages 36 FPS, and Ultra averages 34 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at 1440p is 21 FPS, indicating that the Medium preset imposes a significant rendering load on the GPU.
At 1920x1080, the results are the strongest in the dataset. Low settings reach an average of 113 FPS, Medium averages 80 FPS with a minimum of 68 FPS and maximum of 92 FPS, High averages 56 FPS, and Ultra averages 54 FPS. The 1080p Medium result is notable because it maintains a minimum above the 60 FPS playable threshold, which is not true for any other preset at any resolution except 1440p Low. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Medium settings shows a drop from 80 FPS to 50 FPS, a 37.5% reduction, which suggests that pixel count heavily influences the Arc B370's output in this simulation title.
Best Settings per Resolution
According to the verdict data, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at each resolution is defined by the recorded playable settings. At 3840x2160, no settings preset achieves the 60 FPS threshold, so the best settings are listed as null, with no average FPS recorded. The data confirms that 4K is not viable for this combination.
At 2560x1440, the only playable preset is Low, which averages 71 FPS. This is the single setting that clears the 60 FPS bar at this resolution. Medium at 1440p falls short at 50 FPS, so Low is the definitive choice for smooth gameplay at 1440p.
At 1920x1080, both Low and Medium are listed as playable. The best settings, meaning the highest preset that maintains at least 60 FPS, is Medium, which averages 80 FPS. Low averages 113 FPS, but Medium is the more demanding preset that still clears the threshold. High and Ultra at 1080p both fail to reach 60 FPS, with averages of 56 FPS and 54 FPS respectively, so they are excluded from the playable list.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results indicate that the Intel Arc B370 is the limiting factor in this pairing, especially at higher resolutions. The CPU, an AMD Ryzen 9 7900X with 12 cores and 24 threads, ranks in the 91st percentile among all CPUs according to the database. Its multi-threaded performance is strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 51406. However, the GPU's percentile ranking is far lower, sitting at the 5th percentile among all GPUs, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184.
At 3840x2160, the average FPS across all presets ranges from 18 to 37, which is far below the 60 FPS threshold. The scaling between Low and Ultra at 4K is only 19 FPS (37 to 18), which suggests that even the lowest settings cannot relieve the GPU bottleneck enough to approach playability. At 2560x1440, the scaling between Low and Ultra is 37 FPS (71 to 34), showing that the GPU's rendering capacity is the primary constraint. At 1920x1080, the scaling between Low and Ultra is 59 FPS (113 to 54), which is the largest absolute spread in the dataset. This spread indicates that at 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU at Low settings, but the GPU still saturates as the preset increases.
The resolution scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Medium settings (80 to 50 FPS) and from 1440p to 4K at Medium settings (50 to 26 FPS) shows a consistent drop that tracks with pixel count. The CPU's role is more evident at 1080p Low, where 113 FPS is achieved, but even that result is moderate for a high-end 12-core processor. The data suggests the game's simulation logic is not heavily CPU-bound at these settings, because the frame rate drops are more strongly correlated with GPU load from higher presets than with CPU thread utilization.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the CPU in the database are all within a narrow performance band. The AMD EPYC 7313P has an average score of 53206, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 9 7900X's average of 53288, meaning the EPYC is effectively equivalent. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469, which is 0.3% lower than the 7900X, and the Intel Xeon 634 scores 52974, which is 0.6% higher. The Intel Core i7-14700F scores 53620, which is 0.6% lower. These deltas are all under 1%, so any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in this game when paired with the same GPU.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals are all much older hardware. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, which is 0.2% lower than the Arc B370's 1184. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, which is 0.5% lower. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, which is 0.7% lower. The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, which is 1.4% higher. These rivals are all within a few percentage points of the Arc B370, so in practical terms, swapping to any of these GPUs would yield similar FPS in Pc Building Simulator. The FirePro M2000, despite being the closest in score, would be the most comparable alternative in terms of measured 3DMark performance.
How This Combo Ranks
The combined rank for this CPU and GPU pair in Pc Building Simulator is 3436 out of 3723 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 8% of all configurations. This low rank is driven almost entirely by the GPU's weak 3DMark score and low percentile, since the CPU is in the top 10% of processors. The rank reflects that the Arc B370, with its 25 W TDP and integrated-class bus interface, is not designed for demanding 3D workloads, and this game's rendering requirements at higher presets exceed its capabilities. The combo rank is below the median, and the data indicates that most other tested combinations of CPUs and GPUs in the database outperform this pairing in this specific title.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo at 1920x1080?
A: The highest average FPS at 1920x1080 is 113 FPS, achieved with the Low settings preset.
Q: Can this combination run Pc Building Simulator at 3840x2160 with any settings?
A: No, the recorded data shows no playable settings at 3840x2160. The best average FPS at 4K is 37 FPS on Low, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: Which settings preset at 2560x1440 is the only one that clears 60 FPS?
A: Low settings at 2560x1440 is the only playable preset, with an average of 71 FPS. Medium averages 50 FPS, and High and Ultra average 36 FPS and 34 FPS respectively.
Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 1920x1080 Medium settings?
A: The minimum FPS at 1920x1080 Medium settings is 68 FPS, with a maximum of 92 FPS and an average of 80 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU's performance rank compare to its nearest rival in the database?
A: The Ryzen 9 7900X has an average benchmark score of 53288, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD EPYC 7313P's score of 53206, meaning the two are effectively tied in performance.
Q: What is the combo's rank out of all tested combinations in this game?
A: The combo ranks 3436 out of 3723 tested combinations, placing it in the lower portion of the database for Pc Building Simulator.
The Verdict
The recorded data shows that this PC can run Pc Building Simulator at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440, but only at specific settings. At 1920x1080, the playable settings are Low and Medium, with Medium being the best preset that maintains at least 60 FPS, averaging 80 FPS. At 2560x1440, only Low is playable, averaging 71 FPS. At 3840x2160, there are no playable settings, as even Low averages only 37 FPS. The GPU's low performance percentile is the decisive factor: the CPU is more than capable, but the Arc B370 cannot push this game past 60 FPS at higher resolutions or presets. For a smooth experience, users should target 1080p Medium or 1440p Low, and avoid 4K entirely.