Pc Building Simulator

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the recorded data shows no settings preset reaches the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest average frame rate at this resolution is 37 FPS on Low settings, which falls well short of the playability target. The Ultra preset averages 18 FPS, High averages 19 FPS, and Medium averages 26 FPS with a minimum of 22 FPS and maximum of 30 FPS. There is no recommended setting for 4K operation.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset is the only option that clears the 60 FPS bar. The measured average is 71 FPS, which provides a modest cushion above the playable threshold. Medium settings average 50 FPS with a range of 43 to 58 FPS, High averages 36 FPS, and Ultra averages 34 FPS. None of these three higher presets reach the required frame rate.

At 1920x1080, the best settings that remain at or above 60 FPS are Medium, which delivers an average of 80 FPS. The frame range spans 68 to 92 FPS, meaning even the minimum recorded frame rate stays above the threshold. Low settings average 113 FPS, which is the highest frame rate measured in any configuration. High averages 56 FPS, just below the target, and Ultra averages 54 FPS. For users prioritizing visual quality while maintaining smooth motion, Medium is the highest preset that qualifies.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Pc Building Simulator at 4K resolution?

A: No. The best average frame rate at 3840x2160 is 37 FPS on Low settings. The verdict data lists no playable settings at this resolution, meaning no preset achieves the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the maximum playable preset at 2560x1440?

A: The Low preset is the only playable option at 1440p, with an average of 71 FPS. Medium drops to 50 FPS, High to 36 FPS, and Ultra to 34 FPS, all below the 60 FPS playable mark.

Q: What is the best settings preset at 1920x1080 that maintains 60 FPS?

A: Medium settings provide the highest quality at 1080p that stays at or above 60 FPS, averaging 80 FPS with a minimum of 68 FPS and maximum of 92 FPS. Low averages 113 FPS but at reduced visual quality.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to nearby GPUs in the database?

A: The Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1184. Its nearest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, scores 1186, which is 0.2% higher. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, 0.5% higher, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, 0.7% higher. The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, which is 1.4% lower. The GPU sits in the 5th percentile of all GPUs tested.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 compare to its nearest rivals in CPU benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 has an average benchmark score of 40081, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 40048, 0.1% lower, while the Intel Core 5 221E scores 40144, 0.2% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 9 270 scores 40246, 0.4% higher. The Intel Core i9-13905H scores 40313, 0.6% higher.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low settings average 113 FPS while Ultra averages 54 FPS, a difference of 59 FPS. Medium sits between them at 80 FPS, and High averages 56 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU side, the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 has an average benchmark score of 40081. The nearest rivals in the database are remarkably close in performance. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 40048, just 0.1% lower. The Intel Core 5 221E scores 40144, 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 270 scores 40246, 0.4% higher. The Intel Core i9-13905H scores 40313, 0.6% higher. In practical terms, all four of these processors would produce nearly identical frame rates in Pc Building Simulator, since the CPU performance delta is under one percent across the entire group. Users moving between any of these CPUs would see no meaningful change in gameplay metrics.

For the graphics side, the Intel Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1184, which places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are all older discrete and mobile parts. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, essentially identical at 0.2% higher. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, 0.7% higher. The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, 1.4% lower. The extreme closeness of these scores means any of these GPUs would deliver nearly the same performance in this simulation title. The Arc B370 is effectively at parity with these legacy parts in the database's measurements.

The pattern is clear: the CPU is far above the GPU in relative standing. The Ryzen 7 7700 sits in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the Arc B370 sits in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. This imbalance shapes the system's overall behavior in Pc Building Simulator, where the graphics component becomes the limiting factor at every resolution.

The Verdict

The data shows that this system can run Pc Building Simulator at 1080p and 1440p, but not at 4K. At 1920x1080, the playable settings include Low and Medium, with Medium being the best preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, averaging 80 FPS. Low averages 113 FPS. High and Ultra fall short, with averages of 56 FPS and 54 FPS respectively.

At 2560x1440, only Low settings are playable, averaging 71 FPS. Medium averages 50 FPS, High averages 36 FPS, and Ultra averages 34 FPS, all below the 60 FPS threshold. At 3840x2160, the verdict is clear: no settings preset reaches 60 FPS. The closest is Low at 37 FPS, followed by Medium at 26 FPS, High at 19 FPS, and Ultra at 18 FPS.

The playable threshold in the database is set at 60 FPS. For users targeting smooth gameplay, the recommended configuration is 1080p with Medium settings. At 1440p, users must accept Low settings to maintain the frame rate target. 4K is not viable for this combination.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the measurements show a steep performance curve. Low settings average 37 FPS. Medium settings average 26 FPS, with a minimum of 22 FPS and maximum of 30 FPS. High settings average 19 FPS. Ultra settings average 18 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 19 FPS, showing that visual quality comes at a substantial cost at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates improve considerably. Low settings average 71 FPS. Medium settings average 50 FPS, with a minimum of 43 FPS and maximum of 58 FPS. High settings average 36 FPS. Ultra settings average 34 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 37 FPS, and the Medium preset stays within a 15 FPS band between its minimum and maximum.

At 1920x1080, the system shows its strongest performance. Low settings average 113 FPS. Medium settings average 80 FPS, with a minimum of 68 FPS and maximum of 92 FPS. High settings average 56 FPS. Ultra settings average 54 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 59 FPS, the largest spread across all resolutions. Medium maintains a 24 FPS range between minimum and maximum.

Comparing across resolutions, the 1080p Low average of 113 FPS drops to 71 FPS at 1440p Low, a reduction of 42 FPS, and further to 37 FPS at 4K Low. The scaling shows that resolution has a major impact on this title. The Medium preset follows a similar pattern: 80 FPS at 1080p, 50 FPS at 1440p, and 26 FPS at 4K. High settings move from 56 FPS at 1080p to 36 FPS at 1440p to 19 FPS at 4K. Ultra moves from 54 FPS to 34 FPS to 18 FPS across the same resolution steps.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and Intel Arc B370 ranks 3436 out of 3723 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places the system in the lower portion of the database, roughly in the bottom 8% of all tested combinations. The ranking reflects the GPU's position in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, which drags the overall combo down despite the CPU's much stronger 87th percentile standing.

The rank is consistent with the measured frame rates. A system ranking near the bottom of the database would be expected to struggle at higher resolutions and presets, and the data confirms this. The combo manages playable frame rates only at 1080p Medium and below, and at 1440p Low. These outcomes align with a hardware pairing where the graphics component is the dominant constraint.

The CPU alone, with its 87th percentile rank, would place much higher in the database, but the combined score accounts for both components. The Arc B370's 5th percentile GPU rank, alongside nearest rivals that are over a decade old, keeps this pairing from achieving higher placement. Users should interpret the 3436 rank as a signal that this system is suited for modest settings and lower resolutions in this game.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor in Pc Building Simulator for this hardware combination. The Ryzen 7 7700 scores in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, with strong multi-threaded results such as 18760 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 34470 in Passmark multithread. The Arc B370, by contrast, sits in the 5th percentile of all GPUs with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184. This extreme imbalance means the CPU is rarely the bottleneck.

The scaling between presets at each resolution supports this conclusion. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces the average frame rate from 113 FPS to 54 FPS, a drop of 59 FPS. At 1440p, the same preset change reduces frames from 71 FPS to 34 FPS, a drop of 37 FPS. At 4K, Low to Ultra goes from 37 FPS to 18 FPS, a drop of 19 FPS. The percentage reduction grows as resolution increases, which is typical of GPU-bound workloads. The CPU load in a simulation title like this one is moderate, and the Ryzen 7 7700's 16 threads provide ample headroom.

Resolution scaling also points to GPU dominance. At Low settings, moving from 1080p to 1440p reduces frame rate from 113 to 71 FPS, a 37% decrease. Moving from 1440p to 4K reduces it from 71 to 37 FPS, a 48% decrease. At Medium settings, 1080p to 1440p drops from 80 to 50 FPS, a 38% decrease, and 1440p to 4K drops from 50 to 26 FPS, a 48% decrease. These consistent percentage drops across resolution steps are characteristic of a system where the GPU's pixel throughput is the decisive factor.

The CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions and settings. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 113 FPS, which is high enough that CPU overhead could begin to matter, but the Ryzen 7 7700's single-thread score of 1930 in Cinebench R23 and 1049 in 3DMark single-thread suggest it has ample capacity. The GPU remains the constraint even at the fastest measured configuration. For users considering upgrades, the data points clearly to the graphics component as the area that would yield the largest frame rate improvements in Pc Building Simulator.