Pc Building Simulator

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for Pc Building Simulator with the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and Intel Arc B390 shows a wide performance spread across resolutions and presets. At 3840x2160, the combination struggles to maintain fluid motion. The High preset delivers an average of 21 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops slightly to 20 FPS. Medium at 4K shows a modest improvement with an average of 29 FPS, with recorded minimum and maximum values of 25 and 34 FPS respectively. Dropping to Low at 4K nearly doubles performance versus High, reaching an average of 41 FPS, but this still falls well short of a smooth experience.

Moving to 2560x1440, the situation improves markedly. The Low preset produces an average of 79 FPS, which is the only setting at this resolution that clears the playable threshold. Medium at 1440p averages 56 FPS, with a minimum of 47 FPS and a maximum of 64 FPS. High and Ultra at 1440p both land below 60 FPS, with averages of 39 FPS and 38 FPS respectively. The gap between Low and Medium at 1440p is 23 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High is 17 FPS, indicating a steep performance cost for each step up in visual fidelity.

At 1920x1080, the combination finally shows its strength. The Low preset delivers a very high average of 125 FPS. Medium at 1080p averages 88 FPS, with a minimum of 75 FPS and a maximum of 102 FPS. High at 1080p maintains an average of 62 FPS, just above the 60 FPS target. Ultra at 1080p sits at 59 FPS, fractionally below the threshold. The data shows a clear pattern: as resolution decreases, the headroom for higher presets expands significantly. From 4K Low to 1080p Low, the average FPS jumps from 41 to 125, a difference of 84 FPS. From 4K High to 1080p High, the average climbs from 21 to 62, a difference of 41 FPS.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the database identifies the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, no preset achieves this target. The highest average recorded at 4K is 41 FPS on Low, which is far below the playable threshold. The verdict for 4K is clear: this combination cannot deliver a smooth experience at any setting.

At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Low, with an average of 79 FPS. This is the only preset at 1440p that stays above 60 FPS. Medium at 1440p averages 56 FPS, which misses the target by 4 FPS, so it is not recommended for a locked experience.

At 1920x1080, the best playable setting is High, with an average of 62 FPS. This preset provides the highest visual quality among those that clear 60 FPS. Medium at 1080p also clears the threshold comfortably at 88 FPS, and Low at 1080p reaches 125 FPS, but High is the most demanding option that still meets the performance goal. Ultra at 1080p averages 59 FPS, which is 1 FPS short of the target, so it falls outside the playable range.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Pc Building Simulator at 4K resolution?

A: No. The recorded data shows no playable settings at 3840x2160. The best result is 41 FPS on Low, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium at 4K averages 29 FPS, High averages 21 FPS, and Ultra averages 20 FPS.

Q: What is the highest preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at 2560x1440?

A: Low is the only preset at 1440p that clears 60 FPS, with an average of 79 FPS. Medium at 1440p averages 56 FPS, which is below the threshold.

Q: Does the game run smoothly at 1920x1080 with this hardware?

A: Yes, for most presets. High at 1080p averages 62 FPS, Medium averages 88 FPS, and Low averages 125 FPS. Ultra at 1080p averages 59 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS target.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p at the same settings?

A: At Low settings, the average drops from 125 FPS at 1080p to 79 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 46 FPS. At High settings, the average drops from 62 FPS at 1080p to 39 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 23 FPS.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum FPS recorded at Medium settings?

A: At 3840x2160 Medium, the minimum is 25 FPS and the maximum is 34 FPS. At 2560x1440 Medium, the minimum is 47 FPS and the maximum is 64 FPS. At 1920x1080 Medium, the minimum is 75 FPS and the maximum is 102 FPS.

Q: Is Ultra playable at any resolution?

A: No. Ultra at 1080p averages 59 FPS, which is 1 FPS below the threshold. Ultra at 1440p averages 38 FPS, and Ultra at 4K averages 20 FPS.

The Verdict

The data indicates that this PC can run Pc Building Simulator, but only under specific conditions. At 1920x1080, the combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and Intel Arc B390 delivers playable performance on High, Medium, and Low presets. High at 1080p averages 62 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS target, making it the recommended choice for visual quality. Medium at 1080p offers more headroom at 88 FPS, and Low reaches 125 FPS for very high refresh rate displays.

At 2560x1440, the playable options narrow to a single preset. Low at 1440p averages 79 FPS, which is a comfortable margin above the threshold. Medium at 1440p falls short at 56 FPS, so users at this resolution must accept reduced visual fidelity to maintain smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the combination fails to reach playable performance at any setting. The highest average is 41 FPS on Low, which is still 19 FPS below the target. The verdict by resolution confirms this: 4K has no playable settings, 1440p has Low as the sole playable setting, and 1080p has High, Medium, and Low as playable options.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results reveal how the balance between processor and graphics card shifts across resolutions. At 3840x2160, the frame rates are consistently low regardless of preset, ranging from 20 FPS on Ultra to 41 FPS on Low. This suggests the Intel Arc B390, which sits in the 9th percentile of all GPUs, is the primary bottleneck. The GPU's measured score of 1482 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 places it near the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, which scores 1463, and the NVIDIA GeForce 800M, which scores 1460. At 4K, the rendering load overwhelms the GPU, and the CPU's capabilities cannot compensate.

At 2560x1440, the scaling between presets shows a similar pattern. Low at 1440p averages 79 FPS, but High drops to 39 FPS and Ultra to 38 FPS. The steep decline from Low to Medium, a drop of 23 FPS, indicates that the GPU struggles with increased shading and texture work. The CPU, which ranks in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, has enough headroom to feed the GPU at this resolution, but the graphics hardware limits the final output.

At 1920x1080, the CPU takes on a more prominent role. The Ryzen 7 5800XT, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, can maintain high frame rates even on Low settings, reaching 125 FPS. The scaling from Low to Medium at 1080p shows a drop of 37 FPS, and from Medium to High a drop of 26 FPS. These are substantial reductions, but the absolute numbers remain playable. The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is capable of pushing frame rates well above what the GPU can render at higher presets, but the GPU still governs the upper limits.

The pattern across resolutions is consistent: the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K and 1440p, while the CPU provides ample performance at 1080p. The Ryzen 7 5800XT's passmark multithread score of 28053 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 indicate a strong processor that does not hold back the system in this game. The Arc B390, by contrast, sits at the 9th percentile of all GPUs, which aligns with its performance in the measured FPS data.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Pc Building Simulator, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and Intel Arc B390 ranks 3310 out of 3723 tested combos. This places the pairing in the lower portion of the rankings, which is consistent with the measured frame rates. The GPU's low percentile ranking, 9th among all GPUs, heavily influences the overall position. The CPU's stronger standing, 81st percentile among all CPUs, does not offset the graphics bottleneck in this simulation title.

The nearest rivals for the CPU in synthetic benchmarks include the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H with an average score of 29868 and a delta of 0 percent, the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS with a score of 29955 and a delta of negative 0.3 percent, and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X with a score of 29713 and a delta of 0.6 percent. These comparisons show that the 5800XT is competitive with modern laptop and desktop parts in CPU-centric workloads. However, the GPU's nearest rivals tell a different story. The Intel Arc B390 scores 1482 in its only recorded benchmark, while the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX scores 1463 with a delta of 1.3 percent, the NVIDIA GeForce 800M scores 1460 with a delta of 1.5 percent, and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM scores 1446 with a delta of 2.5 percent. These are all older, low-end graphics solutions, confirming that the Arc B390 is a very weak performer in this context.

The combination's rank of 3310 out of 3723 means that only a small fraction of tested systems fall below it. This is a direct consequence of the GPU's limitations. For Pc Building Simulator, users with this specific pairing should expect to play at 1080p with Medium to High settings, or at 1440p with Low settings. The data does not support any expectation of playable 4K performance. The CPU is more than adequate for the task, but the GPU defines the experience in this game.