Pc Building Simulator

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the recorded data shows a system that struggles to maintain fluid frame rates. High settings produce an average of 19 FPS, while Ultra drops to 18 FPS. Medium settings yield 26 FPS with a recorded minimum of 22 FPS and maximum of 30 FPS. Low settings provide the best result at this resolution, reaching an average of 37 FPS. None of these averages approach the 60 FPS playability threshold, making 4K effectively unplayable for this combination.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance improves noticeably. Low settings hit an average of 71 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings produce an average of 50 FPS, with a minimum of 43 FPS and maximum of 58 FPS. High settings average 36 FPS, while Ultra settles at 34 FPS. The data indicates that only the Low preset delivers a smooth experience at this resolution.

At 1920x1080, the combination becomes viable across multiple presets. Low settings deliver an average of 113 FPS, a commanding figure. Medium settings achieve 80 FPS on average, with a minimum of 68 FPS and maximum of 92 FPS. High settings average 56 FPS, just below the 60 FPS target. Ultra settings produce an average of 54 FPS. The measurements show that both Low and Medium presets clear the playability bar at 1080p.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results reveal a clear dependency on the GPU. The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics solution with a 25 W TDP, and its performance profile places it in the 5th percentile among all GPUs. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT, by contrast, is a desktop processor with 8 cores, 16 threads, and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The CPU’s compute headroom is substantial, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases.

At 1920x1080, the system shows a 33 FPS delta between Low and Medium settings (113 to 80 FPS), and a further 24 FPS drop from Medium to High (80 to 56 FPS). This scaling suggests that the GPU is saturated by higher presets, while the CPU has ample resources. Moving from 1080p Low to 1440p Low, the average drops from 113 to 71 FPS, a 42 FPS reduction. This steep decline points to the GPU’s fill-rate and shading limitations, as the CPU workload remains constant.

At 4K, the GPU is overwhelmed. The difference between Low and Ultra at 3840x2160 is only 19 FPS (37 to 18 FPS), indicating that even the lowest settings push the integrated GPU to its limits. The CPU’s role is minimal here; the Ryzen 7 5800XT’s multicore capabilities, such as a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794, are irrelevant when the GPU cannot keep up. Conversely, at 1080p Low, the CPU can feed frames quickly, but the GPU still caps performance at 113 FPS.

The data suggests that for this game, the GPU is the primary bottleneck at all resolutions. The CPU’s 8-core, 16-thread design and high single-thread score (3359 in Cinebench R23) are more than sufficient for a simulation title like Pc Building Simulator. The scaling between presets and resolutions is almost entirely a function of GPU throughput, not CPU processing.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database’s recorded measurements, this combination of AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and Intel Arc B370 ranks 3436 out of 3723 tested combos for Pc Building Simulator. That places it in the bottom 8 percent of all systems tested for this game. The GPU’s percentile standing (5th among all GPUs) aligns with this low ranking, while the CPU’s percentile (81st among all CPUs) is much stronger.

The nearest GPU rivals in the database are ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (avg score 1186, delta -0.2%), ATI Radeon HD 5770 (avg score 1190, delta -0.5%), AMD Radeon HD 7650M (avg score 1192, delta -0.7%), and AMD FirePro M2000 (avg score 1168, delta 1.4%). The Arc B370’s average benchmark score is 1184, which is statistically on par with these older discrete GPUs. This explains the low combo rank: the GPU is performing at a level comparable to hardware from over a decade ago, despite being a newer integrated solution.

The CPU, in contrast, competes with processors like the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (avg score 29868, delta 0%), AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (avg score 29955, delta -0.3%), and AMD Ryzen 5 9600X (avg score 29713, delta 0.6%). The Ryzen 7 5800XT’s average benchmark score is 29879, placing it in the same performance tier as these modern mobile and desktop chips. The combination of a high-end CPU with a low-end GPU results in a lopsided system that cannot leverage its processing strength for this game.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Pc Building Simulator at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: Yes. The recorded data shows an average of 80 FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, with a minimum of 68 FPS and maximum of 92 FPS. This clears the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: Low settings are the only playable option at 1440p, producing an average of 71 FPS. Medium settings drop to 50 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Is 4K resolution playable with this hardware?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS recorded is 37 at Low settings. High settings average 19 FPS, Medium averages 26 FPS, and Ultra averages 18 FPS. None reach 60 FPS.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B370’s average benchmark score is 1184. Its closest rivals are ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186, 0.2% faster), ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190, 0.5% faster), AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1192, 0.7% faster), and AMD FirePro M2000 (1168, 1.4% slower). Performance is essentially equivalent to these older parts.

Q: What CPU benchmark scores does the Ryzen 7 5800XT achieve?

A: The CPU scores 23794 in Cinebench R23 multicore, 3359 in Cinebench R23 singlecore, and 7683 in 3DMark 16-thread tests. Its average benchmark score is 29879, placing it in the 81st percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Why does the system rank so low in the combo database?

A: The combination ranks 3436 out of 3723 tested combos. The GPU’s 5th percentile standing drags the overall ranking down, despite the CPU’s 81st percentile performance. The GPU is the limiting factor for this game.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no preset achieves 60 FPS. The database records no playable settings for this resolution. The best observed average is 37 FPS at Low, but that falls short of the playability threshold.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, with an average of 71 FPS. Medium settings average 50 FPS, which is below the threshold, so Low is the only viable option.

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average of 80 FPS. Low settings achieve 113 FPS, but Medium provides a better visual experience while still clearing the bar. High settings average 56 FPS, just below the threshold, and Ultra averages 54 FPS.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Pc Building Simulator? The answer depends entirely on the resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is playable on Low and Medium presets, with Medium delivering 80 FPS on average. This is the sweet spot for this combination, offering a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, the system is playable only on Low settings, with an average of 71 FPS. This is a usable experience, but users seeking higher visual fidelity will be disappointed, as Medium drops to 50 FPS and High to 36 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system is not playable at any preset. The best case is Low at 37 FPS, and Ultra drops to 18 FPS. The integrated GPU simply lacks the throughput for 4K rendering in this title.

The data indicates a fundamental mismatch. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is a capable desktop processor, ranking in the 81st percentile, but the Intel Arc B370 is an integrated GPU with a 5th percentile standing. For Pc Building Simulator, a simulation game that is not graphically intense, this combo can deliver 60 FPS at 1080p Medium, but nothing higher. Users with 1440p or 4K displays will need a discrete graphics card to achieve smooth frame rates at higher presets. The verdict is clear: playable at 1080p, marginal at 1440p, and not viable at 4K.