Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Pc Building Simulator
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 36 | 35 | 50 | 68 |
| 1440p QHD | 66 | 69 | 95 | 139 |
| 1080p Full HD | 100 | 107 | 150 | 217 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Pc Building Simulator on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a highly capable 1080p and 1440p experience in Pc Building Simulator, while 4K requires a significant settings compromise. The data shows that this combination is far from a one-trick pony, scaling predictably with resolution and offering a clear performance hierarchy across presets.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the highest preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above the 60 FPS playable threshold is Low, which produces an average of 68.4 FPS. The medium preset dips to 49.9 FPS, and both High and Ultra fall well below the target at 35.2 FPS and 36 FPS, respectively. For a 4K display, users must accept reduced visual fidelity to keep the simulation smooth.
At 2560x1440, the situation improves dramatically. The data indicates that Ultra settings are playable, achieving an average of 65.5 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays above the 60 FPS line. Even the High preset comfortably exceeds the threshold at 69.2 FPS, but Ultra offers the maximum visual quality while still clearing the bar.
At 1920x1080, the combination is thoroughly dominant. The Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 100.2 FPS. This is the highest settings option and it still provides a substantial margin above the playable threshold, leaving headroom for demanding scenes or background tasks.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results reveal a clear shift in system bottleneck as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the CPU's influence is most apparent: the jump from Low to Ultra only reduces the average frame rate from 216.7 FPS to 100.2 FPS, a drop of about 53%. This relatively modest decline suggests the Ryzen 5 7500F is capable of feeding the Arc B580 efficiently, but the GPU is still the primary limiter at higher presets.
At 2560x1440, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a drop from 138.7 FPS to 65.5 FPS, a reduction of roughly 53% again. The absolute numbers are lower than at 1080p, confirming that the Arc B580 is doing more of the heavy lifting as pixel count rises.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is the unequivocal bottleneck. The frame rate collapses from 68.4 FPS at Low to 36 FPS at Ultra, a 47% reduction. The CPU is no longer the limiting factor; the Arc B580's compute and memory bandwidth are the constraints. The Ryzen 5 7500F's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient to keep up with the GPU's output at every resolution tested, as evidenced by the fact that even at 4K Low, the system hits above 60 FPS, which is a demanding scenario for any graphics card.
Measured FPS Breakdown
1920x1080:
- Low: 216.7 FPS average
- Medium: 150.2 FPS average
- High: 107.1 FPS average
- Ultra: 100.2 FPS average
The 1080p results show a wide spread, with Low being nearly twice as fast as High. The difference between High and Ultra is a modest 6.9 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset adds visual complexity without a proportional performance cost.
2560x1440:
- Low: 138.7 FPS average
- Medium: 94.9 FPS average
- High: 69.2 FPS average
- Ultra: 65.5 FPS average
At 1440p, the pattern holds but with reduced headroom. Low is still highly playable, while Ultra just barely clears the 60 FPS mark. The gap between High and Ultra narrows to only 3.7 FPS, making Ultra a sensible choice for owners of 1440p monitors.
3840x2160:
- Low: 68.4 FPS average
- Medium: 49.9 FPS average
- High: 35.2 FPS average
- Ultra: 36 FPS average
The 4K results are the most punishing. Only Low is playable, and the jump from Low to Medium represents a 27% performance penalty. Interestingly, High and Ultra are nearly identical in performance, with Ultra being only 0.8 FPS faster than High, suggesting a rendering bottleneck that is not alleviated by the higher preset.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the nearestRivals data, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is closely matched by the Intel Core i7-11850H, which has a benchmark score 0.1% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is 0.2% faster, and the Intel Core i7-13620H is 0.2% slower. The Intel Core 5 210H trails by 0.4%. In practical terms, these processors would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Pc Building Simulator, with differences well within measurement error. Users upgrading from any of these CPUs would see no meaningful change in this game.
For the Intel Arc B580, the closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, which scores 0.2% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 is 0.6% slower, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is 0.7% faster. The NVIDIA P106-100 is 1% slower. This is a notable spread: the Arc B580 sits in a performance band that encompasses several generations of GPUs. A system with an RTX 3080 would achieve slightly higher frame rates at all resolutions, but the difference would be small enough to keep the same settings recommendations. Conversely, the RX 580 2048SP would produce marginally lower scores, potentially pushing 1440p Ultra below the 60 FPS threshold.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Pc Building Simulator at 4K with high settings?
A: No. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average frame rate is 35.2 FPS, which is well below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Only the Low preset achieves a playable average of 68.4 FPS.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p?
A: The Ultra preset is playable at 2560x1440, delivering an average of 65.5 FPS. This is the highest quality setting that remains at or above 60 FPS.
Q: How much faster is 1080p compared to 1440p at the same settings?
A: At Ultra settings, the 1080p average is 100.2 FPS versus 65.5 FPS at 1440p, a difference of 34.7 FPS. At Low settings, the gap is 78 FPS (216.7 versus 138.7).
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?
A: The GPU is the primary limit. The Ryzen 5 7500F's strong single-thread performance allows the Arc B580 to be the bottleneck, as seen in the significant frame rate drops when raising presets at the same resolution.
Q: Does the Ultra preset at 4K perform better than High?
A: The data shows Ultra at 36 FPS and High at 35.2 FPS. The difference is negligible (0.8 FPS), indicating both presets are constrained by the same GPU limitation.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and Intel Arc B580 combination ranks 2848th out of 3723 tested combos for this game, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo rank of 2848 out of 3723 is a nuanced indicator. It places this configuration in the 76th percentile, meaning roughly 24% of tested combos perform worse. This might seem low given the playable 1440p Ultra results, but the ranking reflects the entire spectrum of tested hardware, which includes many higher-end CPUs and GPUs. The rank is heavily influenced by the GPU's absolute performance ceiling, which limits 4K capability.
However, the rank should not be interpreted as a mark against the combo for its intended use case. The data shows that for 1080p and 1440p gaming, this pairing is more than sufficient, with the Arc B580's 12 GB of memory and the Ryzen 5 7500F's efficient architecture providing a balanced platform. The rank is a broad statistical measure; the per-resolution verdicts are a more actionable guide. For a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator, which is not typically a graphical showcase, this combo offers a smooth experience at mainstream resolutions, and the 4K limitation is an acceptable trade-off given the hardware class.