Pc Building Simulator

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a consistent 60+ FPS experience in Pc Building Simulator at 1080p and 1440p, but 4K requires dropping to Low settings to stay playable. Benchmark data shows this combo ranks 2997th out of 3723 tested combinations, placing it in the 80th percentile for this specific game. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile against all tested CPUs, while the GPU holds the 65th percentile against all GPUs, indicating a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically limits the other in this simulation title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rate data reveals a clear scaling pattern across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the combo starts at 192 FPS average on Low settings, drops to 136 FPS on Medium, 96 FPS on High, and 91 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset has the most complete data with a minimum of 115 FPS and maximum of 156 FPS, showing a tight frame time distribution. The gap between High and Ultra at 1080p is only 5 FPS, suggesting diminishing returns beyond the High preset for this hardware configuration.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance scales down predictably. Low settings produce 121 FPS average, Medium delivers 86 FPS with a minimum of 73 and maximum of 99, High yields 61 FPS, and Ultra drops to 58 FPS. The step from Medium to High at 1440p costs 25 FPS, while the step from High to Ultra costs only 3 FPS. This indicates that Ultra at 1440p sits right at the edge of the 60 FPS threshold, with the measured average falling just 2 FPS short.

At 3840x2160, the performance curve becomes steeper. Low settings achieve 63 FPS average, Medium drops to 45 FPS with a minimum of 38 and maximum of 52, High falls to 32 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 30 FPS. The data shows a nearly linear degradation from Low to High at 4K, with each preset step costing roughly 15-16 FPS. Ultra at 4K delivers exactly half the frame rate of Low at 4K, highlighting the significant load increase from the highest preset at this resolution.

The measured data includes min and max values only for the Medium preset at each resolution. At 1080p Medium, the 115-156 FPS range represents a 41 FPS spread, indicating moderate frame pacing. At 1440p Medium, the 73-99 FPS range shows a 26 FPS spread, tighter than 1080p. At 4K Medium, the 38-52 FPS range has a 14 FPS spread, suggesting that lower average frame rates come with more consistent frame delivery in this game. The absence of min/max data for other presets means the analysis relies on average values, but the available data points suggest the combo handles frame pacing well under load.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Pc Building Simulator at 4K?

A: Yes, but only on Low settings. The measured average at 3840x2160 Low is 63 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium at 4K drops to 45 FPS average, High to 32 FPS, and Ultra to 30 FPS, all below the playable threshold.

Q: What is the best preset at 1440p for this hardware?

A: High settings at 2560x1440 deliver 61 FPS average, which is the highest preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. Ultra at 1440p falls to 58 FPS average, just missing the playable threshold.

Q: Does the Ultra preset at 1080p maintain 60 FPS?

A: Yes. The measured average at 1920x1080 Ultra is 91 FPS, well above the 60 FPS threshold. This makes Ultra the best playable preset at 1080p for this combo.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems for this game?

A: The combo ranks 2997th out of 3723 tested combinations. This places it in the upper 20 percent of all tested systems for Pc Building Simulator, though it is not a top-tier configuration.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7400F or the Arc B570 the limiting factor?

A: The GPU sits at the 65th percentile against all GPUs, while the CPU holds the 83rd percentile against all CPUs. The lower GPU percentile suggests the Arc B570 is the primary constraint in this pairing for this game.

Q: What are the closest performance alternatives to this CPU and GPU?

A: For the CPU, the Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32707 (0.1% difference), Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697 (0.2%), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 (-0.2%), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662 (0.3%). For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534 (0.1%), Intel Arc A750 scores 20582 (-0.1%), NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480 (0.4%), and AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662 (-0.5%).

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 2997 out of 3723 tested combinations places this system in the 80th percentile for Pc Building Simulator. This means roughly 20 percent of tested systems perform worse, while about 80 percent perform better. The rank reflects the combined capability of the Ryzen 5 7400F and Arc B570 specifically for this game, not general compute performance.

The CPU's percentile of 83 against all CPUs indicates strong general processing capability, while the GPU's percentile of 65 against all GPUs shows more modest graphics performance. This imbalance is typical for simulation games, which often depend more on CPU throughput. The CPU's multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 21765 and single-core score of 3072 provide ample processing headroom, while the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 14195 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2649 show capable but not exceptional graphics throughput.

The rank of 2997 suggests this combo sits in the middle of the pack for this game. The measured FPS data confirms this positioning, with strong 1080p performance, acceptable 1440p performance, and limited 4K capability. The combination's behavior aligns with the expectation that a 6-core Zen 4 CPU paired with a mid-range Battlemage GPU handles simulation workloads competently without reaching the heights of higher-tier configurations.

The gap between the CPU and GPU percentiles explains the frame rate scaling patterns. At lower resolutions where CPU load dominates, the combo performs well, as shown by the 192 FPS at 1080p Low. At higher resolutions where GPU load increases, performance drops more sharply, as seen in the 30 FPS at 4K Ultra. This pattern indicates the Arc B570 becomes the bottleneck beyond 1080p, consistent with its 65th percentile standing.

The Verdict

This PC can run Pc Building Simulator at playable frame rates across all three tested resolutions, but with important preset limitations. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Low at 192 FPS, Medium at 136 FPS, High at 96 FPS, and Ultra at 91 FPS. The best playable setting at 1080p is Ultra, delivering 91 FPS average.

At 2560x1440, three presets remain playable: Low at 121 FPS, Medium at 86 FPS, and High at 61 FPS. Ultra falls short at 58 FPS average, just 2 FPS below the threshold. The best playable setting at 1440p is High, with 61 FPS average.

At 3840x2160, only Low settings clear the 60 FPS threshold, achieving 63 FPS average. Medium drops to 45 FPS, High to 32 FPS, and Ultra to 30 FPS. The best playable setting at 4K is Low, with 63 FPS average.

For users targeting 60 FPS as the minimum acceptable performance, the recommended configurations are Ultra at 1080p, High at 1440p, and Low at 4K. Those willing to accept lower frame rates could push higher presets, but the data indicates 60 FPS is only guaranteed under these specific settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest CPU rivals to the Ryzen 5 7400F provide insight into what other processors would perform similarly. The Intel Core i5-14600T has an average benchmark score of 32707, a 0.1% difference from the Ryzen. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697, a 0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, a -0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662, a 0.3% difference. All four rivals sit within a tight band of the Ryzen 5 7400F's 32750 average benchmark score, meaning any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in this game when paired with the same GPU.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals to the Arc B570 include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile with an average score of 20534 (0.1% difference), the Intel Arc A750 with 20582 (-0.1%), the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M with 20480 (0.4%), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X with 20662 (-0.5%). The Arc B570's average benchmark score of 20556 places it squarely between these alternatives. Users considering a GPU swap could expect virtually identical performance from any of these four cards in Pc Building Simulator, given the small score differences.

The tight clustering of these rival scores indicates that this performance tier is well-populated. A system built with the Ryzen 5 7400F plus any of these rival GPUs would deliver similar measured FPS values to the data shown here. Similarly, pairing a different CPU from the rival list with the Arc B570 would produce frame rates within a few percentage points of the measured results.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, with a measured average of 63 FPS. This is the only playable preset at 4K. Medium falls below the threshold at 45 FPS, and High and Ultra sit at 32 and 30 FPS respectively.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding playable preset is High, with a measured average of 61 FPS. Low delivers 121 FPS and Medium delivers 86 FPS, both well above the threshold. Ultra at 58 FPS does not meet the 60 FPS requirement, so High is the recommended maximum setting at this resolution.

At 1920x1080, all presets are playable, and the most demanding is Ultra with a measured average of 91 FPS. Low achieves 192 FPS, Medium 136 FPS, and High 96 FPS. Ultra provides the best visual quality while still maintaining a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold, with a 31 FPS buffer.

These settings represent the maximum visual quality available while maintaining the 60 FPS playability standard. Users with more tolerant performance preferences could increase settings, but the data shows these are the highest presets that guarantee the playable threshold is met.