Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator is not a demanding title by modern standards, but the combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and the Intel Arc B370 still requires some careful settings selection depending on your target resolution. The recorded data shows a clear pattern: this combo can deliver smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, but 4K is out of reach. The following analysis breaks down exactly what settings you need to use to stay above the 60 FPS threshold, how the hardware scales across resolutions, and where the bottleneck sits.

Best Settings per Resolution

1920x1080: The best playable setting is Medium, which produces an average of 80 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, and it does so with a comfortable margin. The measured frame times show a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS, meaning even the worst-case dips stay above the playable threshold. Low settings push the average to 113 FPS, but if you want the best visual quality while maintaining smooth gameplay, Medium is the highest preset that qualifies.

2560x1440: The best playable setting is Low, with an average of 71 FPS. This is the only preset at 1440p that clears the 60 FPS bar. Medium falls to 50 FPS average, with minimums down to 43 FPS, which is noticeably below the threshold. High and Ultra are not viable, averaging 36 FPS and 34 FPS respectively. If you have a 1440p monitor, you are restricted to Low settings to maintain smooth playback, which is a significant visual compromise but the only way to stay playable at this resolution.

3840x2160: There are no playable settings at 4K. Even Low settings only manage an average of 37 FPS, which is far below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 26 FPS, High averages 19 FPS, and Ultra averages 18 FPS. The data shows this combination of CPU and GPU is not capable of running Pc Building Simulator at 4K with acceptable performance. If you are on a 4K display, you will need to run the game at a lower resolution or upgrade the GPU.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Pc Building Simulator at 1080p with high settings?

A: No. High settings at 1920x1080 produce an average of 56 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable preset at 1080p is Medium, which averages 80 FPS.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p?

A: Low is the only playable preset at 2560x1440, averaging 71 FPS. Medium drops to 50 FPS average, and High and Ultra are even lower at 36 FPS and 34 FPS respectively.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this combo?

A: No. The verdict by resolution lists no playable settings at 3840x2160. The best result at 4K is Low settings with 37 FPS average, which is far below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to other GPUs in the database?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 1184, which places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, which scores 1186, a delta of -0.2%. The Intel Arc B370 also sits very close to the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190, -0.5%) and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1192, -0.7%).

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7400F compare to other CPUs?

A: The CPU sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32750. Its closest rival is the Intel Core i5-14600T, which scores 32707, a delta of 0.1%. It is also nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697, 0.2%) and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812, -0.2%).

Q: What is the minimum FPS at 1080p Medium settings?

A: The measured data shows a minimum of 68 FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings. This is above the 60 FPS threshold, so the frame rate stays playable even during the most demanding moments.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080:

• Low: 113 FPS average. This is the strongest result at this resolution, offering a large margin above the playable threshold.
• Medium: 80 FPS average, with a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS. This is the recommended preset for 1080p.
• High: 56 FPS average. This falls just short of the 60 FPS threshold, making it a borderline choice for users who prioritize visuals over frame rate.
• Ultra: 54 FPS average. The most demanding preset at 1080p is not playable, sitting 6 FPS below the threshold.

2560x1440:

• Low: 71 FPS average. The only playable preset at this resolution, with a reasonable margin above 60 FPS.
• Medium: 50 FPS average, with a minimum of 43 FPS and a maximum of 58 FPS. This is a significant drop from Low, making it unplayable.
• High: 36 FPS average. A major step down from Medium, indicating a steep scaling curve.
• Ultra: 34 FPS average. Essentially the same performance as High, showing that the GPU is already saturated.

3840x2160:

• Low: 37 FPS average. The best result at 4K, but still far below the 60 FPS threshold.
• Medium: 26 FPS average, with a minimum of 22 FPS and a maximum of 30 FPS. The frame rate is consistently low and not smooth.
• High: 19 FPS average. This is barely playable in a slideshow sense, but not for interactive use.
• Ultra: 18 FPS average. The worst result in the dataset, essentially matching High in performance.

The data shows a consistent pattern: each settings tier at a given resolution costs roughly 15-20 FPS, and moving up a resolution tier costs a similar amount. The transition from 1080p Medium to 1440p Low, for example, only costs 9 FPS on average, which is a modest penalty for a significant resolution increase.

The Verdict

This PC can run Pc Building Simulator, but with significant caveats. At 1920x1080, the system is playable on Low and Medium presets, with Medium offering the best balance of visuals and performance at 80 FPS average. High and Ultra are not playable, falling to 56 FPS and 54 FPS respectively. At 2560x1440, the system is playable only on Low settings, averaging 71 FPS. This is a workable experience, but you are limited to the lowest visual quality preset. At 3840x2160, there are no playable settings. The best result is Low at 37 FPS, which is far below the 60 FPS threshold and not suitable for a smooth experience.

The verdict by resolution confirms this: 1080p has playable settings of Low and Medium, with the best being Medium at 80 FPS. 1440p has only Low as playable, with 71 FPS. 4K has no playable settings. For users targeting 1080p, this is a solid setup for this game. For 1440p, it is workable but requires a compromise on visual quality. For 4K, it is not a viable option.

CPU and GPU Roles

The recorded data shows that this game is heavily GPU-bound, and the Intel Arc B370 is the limiting factor at every resolution. The CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, is a strong performer in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and a single-core score of 3072. This is more than enough headroom for a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator, which typically relies on a few threads for logic and rendering calls.

The GPU, however, is in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1184. This is a massive gap in relative strength. The scaling across resolutions confirms the GPU bottleneck. At 1080p, the game averages 80 FPS on Medium. At 1440p, the same preset drops to 50 FPS, a 37.5% reduction. At 4K, it drops to 26 FPS, a 48% reduction from 1440p. This steep scaling curve is characteristic of a GPU that is running out of pixel throughput, not a CPU limitation.

The settings scaling reinforces this. At 1080p, moving from Low to Medium costs 33 FPS (113 to 80), which is a large drop. Moving from Medium to High costs 24 FPS (80 to 56), and High to Ultra costs only 2 FPS (56 to 54). The diminishing returns at the top end suggest the GPU is hitting a hard ceiling. At 1440p, the same pattern appears: Low to Medium costs 21 FPS, Medium to High costs 14 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 2 FPS. The CPU is not the constraint here; the Arc B370 simply cannot push more frames once the pixel count and shading load increase.

At 4K, the GPU is completely overwhelmed. Even Low settings only achieve 37 FPS, and the difference between High and Ultra is just 1 FPS (19 to 18). This is a clear sign that the GPU is saturated and the CPU has no impact on the outcome. For users who want to improve performance, upgrading the GPU would have the largest effect. The Ryzen 5 7400F is not holding back this game at any resolution, and it has significant headroom for future upgrades.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this pairing of AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and Intel Arc B370 ranks 3436 out of 3723 tested combos for Pc Building Simulator. This places it in the bottom 8% of all configurations, which aligns with the measured performance data. The GPU's low percentile ranking (5th) drags the overall combo down, while the CPU's strong ranking (83rd) cannot compensate for the graphics bottleneck.

The ranking position of 3436 out of 3723 means that the vast majority of other tested systems deliver better performance in this game. This is not surprising given the GPU's position in the 5th percentile, but it is notably the combo is still usable at 1080p and 1440p with the right settings. The ranking reflects the overall capability of the system, not just its playability at a single resolution. Users with this combo should expect to play at 1080p Medium or 1440p Low, and should not expect to push higher settings without significant frame rate drops. The data indicates that this is a low-end gaming system, suitable for esports titles and older or less demanding games, but not for modern high-fidelity experiences at high resolutions.