Pc Building Simulator

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for this combination of AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and Intel Arc B370 in Pc Building Simulator shows a clear performance curve that scales predictably with resolution and preset level. At 3840x2160, the highest resolution tested, the combination is heavily constrained. High settings produce an average of 19 FPS, while Ultra drops to 18 FPS. Medium settings at this resolution achieve an average of 26 FPS, with a minimum of 22 FPS and a maximum of 30 FPS. The only playable option at 4K is Low, which reaches 37 FPS on average, still well below the 60 FPS threshold used in this database.

Moving down to 2560x1440, the picture improves noticeably. Low settings deliver an average of 71 FPS, which clears the playability bar. Medium settings average 50 FPS, with a minimum of 43 FPS and a maximum of 58 FPS. High settings drop to 36 FPS on average, and Ultra falls further to 34 FPS. The step between Low and Medium at this resolution is 21 FPS, a substantial gap that indicates the preset level has a strong impact on the GPU workload.

At 1920x1080, the combination performs best. Low settings average 113 FPS, which is the highest average recorded across all tested configurations. Medium settings average 80 FPS, with a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS. High settings average 56 FPS, just under the 60 FPS threshold, while Ultra averages 54 FPS. The data indicates that 1080p Medium is the most demanding preset that remains fully playable, and even High and Ultra sit close to the threshold, suggesting that minor adjustments could push them over the line.

Across all resolutions, the minimum FPS values were only recorded for Medium settings. At 4K Medium, the 22 FPS minimum versus the 30 FPS maximum shows a variance of 8 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the spread is 15 FPS, from 43 to 58. At 1080p Medium, the spread is 24 FPS, from 68 to 92. This pattern suggests that lower resolutions allow for larger frame-time swings, although the absolute minimums remain comfortable at 1080p.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database for Pc Building Simulator, this exact CPU and GPU pairing ranks 3436 out of 3723 tested combinations. That places it in the lower portion of the overall distribution, roughly in the bottom 8 percent of all recorded combos. The rank reflects the measured FPS data across all resolutions and settings, and the low position is consistent with the fact that the Arc B370 only reaches 60 FPS or above at 1080p Low and Medium, plus 1440p Low.

The CPU itself has a percentile score of 75 among all tested processors, meaning it outperforms three quarters of the CPUs in the database. The GPU, by contrast, sits at the 5th percentile among all tested GPUs. The asymmetry is stark: the Ryzen 5 2600 is a mid-tier processor by database standards, while the Arc B370 is near the bottom of the GPU distribution. In a game like Pc Building Simulator, which is not graphically demanding by modern standards, the GPU still becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the FPS data shows.

The overall combo rank is driven primarily by the GPU's low standing. Even with a CPU that ranks in the 75th percentile, the combination cannot overcome the GPU's position at the 5th percentile. The result is a pairing that handles 1080p well but struggles at 4K, where the average FPS on any preset fails to approach 60.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 in the database are a mix of mobile and server processors. The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V scores 21440 in the average benchmark, which is 0.2 percent higher than the Ryzen's 21484. The Intel Core i9-11900H scores 21367, a 0.5 percent deficit. The Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 21635, which is 0.7 percent higher, and the AMD EPYC 9454 scores 21223, a 1.2 percent deficit. These deltas are all within 1.2 percent, meaning any of these CPUs would behave nearly identically to the Ryzen 5 2600 in this game, assuming the same GPU.

For the Intel Arc B370, the nearest rivals are significantly older graphics parts. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186 in the same benchmark, which is 0.2 percent higher than the Arc B370's 1184. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, a 0.5 percent advantage. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, a 0.7 percent lead, and the AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, a 1.4 percent deficit. These are all within 1.4 percent of the Arc B370, so users with any of these GPUs paired with a similar CPU would see comparable FPS in Pc Building Simulator.

It is worth remembering the Arc B370's nearest rivals are all from previous hardware generations, which reinforces the GPU's low placement in the database. The performance gap between the Arc B370 and more modern GPUs is not captured in the nearest rival list, but the percentile rank of 5 already indicates how far down the distribution it sits.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Pc Building Simulator? The answer depends entirely on the resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the combination clears the 60 FPS threshold on both Low and Medium settings. Medium is the best playable preset, with an average of 80 FPS, a minimum of 68 FPS, and a maximum of 92 FPS. Low averages 113 FPS. High and Ultra fall short, with averages of 56 and 54 FPS respectively.

At 2560x1440, only Low settings are playable, with an average of 71 FPS. Medium drops to 50 FPS, which is below the threshold, and High and Ultra are further behind at 36 and 34 FPS. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS. The best result is Low at 37 FPS, followed by Medium at 26 FPS, High at 19 FPS, and Ultra at 18 FPS.

The verdict is straightforward: this system is capable of a smooth experience at 1080p on Medium settings, and it can handle 1440p only on the lowest preset. 4K is not viable for 60 FPS gameplay under any tested settings. Users targeting 1440p or 4K would need a stronger GPU to reach the playability threshold.

FAQ

Q: What is the best preset for 1080p with this CPU and GPU?

A: Medium settings at 1920x1080 provide an average of 80 FPS, with a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS.

Q: Can this combo reach 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: Only on Low settings, which average 71 FPS. Medium drops to 50 FPS, High to 36 FPS, and Ultra to 34 FPS, all below the threshold.

Q: Is 4K playable with this system?

A: No. The highest average at 3840x2160 is 37 FPS on Low settings. Medium averages 26 FPS, High 19 FPS, and Ultra 18 FPS. None reach 60 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 2600 has an average benchmark score of 21484. Its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, scores 21440, a 0.2 percent difference. The Intel Xeon D-1746TER is 0.7 percent higher, while the Intel Core i9-11900H is 0.5 percent lower.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B370 scores 1184 in the recorded benchmark. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, a 0.5 percent lead, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, a 0.7 percent lead. The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, a 1.4 percent deficit.

Q: What is the overall rank of this combo in the game?

A: It ranks 3436 out of 3723 tested combinations. The CPU is at the 75th percentile among all processors, while the GPU is at the 5th percentile among all GPUs.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the best playable preset is Medium, which delivers an average of 80 FPS with a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS. Low averages 113 FPS but is less demanding, so Medium is the recommended choice for visual quality while maintaining smooth performance. High and Ultra are not recommended because they average 56 and 54 FPS respectively, both below the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, the only playable preset is Low, with an average of 71 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 60 FPS, averaging 50, 36, and 34 FPS respectively. Users at this resolution must accept Low settings to stay above the threshold.

At 3840x2160, there is no playable preset. Low averages 37 FPS, Medium 26 FPS, High 19 FPS, and Ultra 18 FPS. The database records no best settings at this resolution because none clear the 60 FPS bar.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU in Pc Building Simulator. The Ryzen 5 2600, with a 75th percentile ranking among all CPUs, provides ample processing headroom for a simulation title. The Arc B370, at the 5th percentile among GPUs, is the bottleneck in this pairing. This is most evident at 4K, where the FPS drops to 18 to 37 depending on preset, a range that reflects the GPU's inability to handle the pixel count.

The scaling between resolutions reinforces this conclusion. At 1080p Low, the average is 113 FPS. At 1440p Low, it drops to 71 FPS, a 42 FPS reduction. At 4K Low, it falls to 37 FPS, another 34 FPS reduction. This steep decline as resolution increases is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU's workload does not change dramatically with resolution, but the GPU must process four times as many pixels at 4K compared to 1080p.

Preset scaling also points to the GPU as the limiting factor. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces the average from 113 FPS to 54 FPS, a 59 FPS swing. The same preset swing at 1440p goes from 71 FPS down to 34 FPS, and at 4K from 37 FPS down to 18 FPS. The consistent halving of FPS at each resolution step indicates that the GPU is saturated well before the CPU reaches its limits.

The CPU's role becomes more visible at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed. At 1080p Low, the 113 FPS average suggests the CPU can feed frames at a high rate without becoming a constraint. The minimum FPS data at Medium settings, 68 FPS at 1080p versus 43 FPS at 1440p, shows that frame pacing also degrades with resolution, again pointing to GPU pressure. In summary, the Ryzen 5 2600 is more than sufficient for this game, and the Arc B370 determines the playable envelope at each resolution.