Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Palworld
Survival 2024

Palworld

87%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
147 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
69 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
97 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
46 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
54 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
25 FPS
11ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,522
Your CPU 70,163
Graphics Card
Required 27,862
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 25 33 43 54
1440p QHD 46 60 78 97
1080p Full HD 69 91 119 147

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 91
1920x1080 Low 147
1920x1080 Medium 119
1920x1080 Ultra 69
2560x1440 High 60
2560x1440 Low 97
2560x1440 Medium 78
2560x1440 Ultra 46
3840x2160 High 33
3840x2160 Low 54
3840x2160 Medium 43
3840x2160 Ultra 25

Performance Analysis: Palworld on Your System

The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the Intel Arc B580 presents a compelling mid-range benchmark scenario for Palworld. The data indicates a system capable of solid 1080p and 1440p gameplay, but one that falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K. Across all tested resolutions, the combination delivers a measurable performance curve that scales predictably with both resolution and graphical settings, though the variance between presets is substantial.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark results for this CPU-GPU pairing in Palworld reveal a clear performance hierarchy across the three resolutions tested. At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its strongest performance, with the Low preset achieving an average of 147 FPS. Moving up the settings ladder, the Medium preset averages 119 FPS with a minimum of 101 FPS and a maximum of 137 FPS. The High preset records an average of 91 FPS, while the most demanding Ultra preset still maintains a respectable 69 FPS average. This places the entire 1080p range comfortably above the 60 FPS playability threshold, with even the maximum settings leaving headroom.

At 2560x1440, performance scales downward as expected. The Low preset averages 97 FPS, while Medium delivers 78 FPS with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 90 FPS. The High preset lands precisely at 60 FPS average, which is exactly at the playability threshold. The Ultra preset, however, drops to 46 FPS average, falling below the 60 FPS target. This indicates that 1440p users must make a settings compromise between visual fidelity and frame rate, with High being the ceiling for smooth gameplay.

The 3840x2160 results show a system under significant load. The Low preset averages 54 FPS, which is tantalizingly close to but still below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium produces an average of 43 FPS with a minimum of 37 FPS and a maximum of 50 FPS, showing notable frame-time variance. High drops to 33 FPS average, and Ultra bottoms out at 25 FPS. None of the 4K presets achieve playable frame rates, suggesting that this resolution is not viable for this combination in Palworld without substantial compromises.

How This Combo Ranks

The benchmark database places this specific CPU-GPU combination at rank 2798 out of 3711 tested combos for Palworld. This percentile position indicates that approximately 75% of tested configurations deliver better performance in this title, while about 25% perform worse. The ranking reflects the balance between the i7-14700KF's strong computational capabilities and the Arc B580's mid-range rasterization performance.

This rank is particularly informative when considering the GPU's benchmark percentile of 68, meaning it outperforms 68% of all GPUs in the database. The CPU, meanwhile, sits at the 94th percentile among all processors. The gap between these two percentiles suggests that the Arc B580 is the limiting factor in this pairing for Palworld, as the CPU has substantial headroom that the GPU cannot fully utilize at higher resolutions. The combo's overall rank of 2798/3711 (roughly the 75th percentile) aligns more closely with the GPU's standing than the CPU's, reinforcing this interpretation.

Best Settings per Resolution

For users seeking the highest visual quality while maintaining at least 60 FPS average, the data provides clear guidance for each resolution.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is fully playable with an average of 69 FPS. This is the most demanding setting that clears the threshold, and it does so with a margin of 9 FPS. Given that the Low preset reaches 147 FPS, there is considerable performance headroom for users with high-refresh-rate monitors who might prefer lower settings for competitive play.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is the optimal choice, averaging exactly 60 FPS. This represents the highest quality setting that maintains playability, though it does so with no margin for error. Users who prioritize frame rate stability might prefer the Medium preset, which averages 78 FPS and provides a 67 FPS minimum, offering more consistent performance during demanding scenes.

At 3840x2160, no preset achieves the 60 FPS threshold. The closest option is Low at 54 FPS average, which falls 6 FPS short. The verdict data confirms that 4K is not playable at any setting for this combination, making 1440p the maximum viable resolution for this system.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i7-14700KF provide context for CPU performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 0.2% higher in average benchmark score, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is 0.4% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X trails by 0.9%, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is 1% ahead. These deltas are negligible in real-world gaming, meaning any of these CPUs paired with the Arc B580 would produce nearly identical Palworld frame rates.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B580's nearest rivals show a tight cluster of performance. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 0.2% lower, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 is 0.6% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 0.7% lower, and the NVIDIA P106-100 is 1% lower. This grouping indicates that the Arc B580 sits in a narrow performance band where all four alternatives would deliver within a 1% margin of each other in Palworld. Users with any of these GPUs paired with a high-end CPU would expect similar measured FPS values to those presented here.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions and presets reveals distinct roles for each component. At 1920x1080, the CPU's influence is most apparent. The jump from Low to Ultra at this resolution only reduces average FPS from 147 to 69, a 53% drop. This relatively modest reduction—compared to the settings gap—suggests that the i7-14700KF is capable of feeding the Arc B580 adequately even at lower settings, but the GPU becomes the bottleneck as settings increase.

At 2560x1440, the GPU's workload increases substantially. The Low preset still achieves 97 FPS, but Ultra falls to 46 FPS, a 52.6% reduction. The fact that 1440p High lands exactly at 60 FPS, while 1080p Ultra achieves 69 FPS, indicates that the resolution increase has a more significant impact than the settings increase. This demonstrates that the Arc B580 is the primary constraint at this resolution.

The 3840x2160 data confirms the GPU's dominant role. Even at Low settings, the system only manages 54 FPS, and the scaling from Low to Ultra (54 to 25 FPS) shows a 53.7% reduction. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking suggests it is not the limiting factor; rather, the Arc B580's 68th percentile GPU ranking and 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth cannot sustain the pixel throughput demanded at 4K. The 33 FPS at 4K High versus 60 FPS at 1440p High illustrates how resolution doubling roughly halves performance, pointing squarely at GPU-bound behavior.

The Verdict

The data clearly answers whether this PC can run Palworld. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, with all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—exceeding the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset's 69 FPS average provides a comfortable experience at maximum settings.

At 2560x1440, the system remains playable but with restrictions. The High preset achieves exactly 60 FPS, making it the best playable setting. Low and Medium also clear the threshold at 97 and 78 FPS respectively. Ultra at 46 FPS is not playable.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is unequivocal: this combination cannot run Palworld at playable frame rates. No settings preset reaches 60 FPS, with the best option being Low at 54 FPS. Users seeking 4K gameplay would need to consider a more powerful GPU or reduce resolution. For most users, the sweet spot is 1440p High or 1080p Ultra, depending on monitor capabilities and visual preferences.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Palworld at 60 FPS on 1080p with maximum settings?

A: Yes. The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 averages 69 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?

A: The High preset at 2560x1440 averages exactly 60 FPS. Medium averages 78 FPS and Low averages 97 FPS, but High is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS.

Q: Is 4K gameplay possible with this CPU-GPU combination?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS across all presets is 54 FPS at Low settings. Medium averages 43 FPS, High averages 33 FPS, and Ultra averages 25 FPS. All fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF has an average benchmark score of 70163, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F's 69996 score. This difference is negligible for gaming performance.

Q: Which component limits performance in Palworld?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions. The Arc B580 ranks in the 68th percentile among GPUs, while the i7-14700KF ranks in the 94th percentile among CPUs. Performance drops significantly between 1440p and 4K, indicating GPU-bound behavior.

Q: What is the frame rate range at Medium settings in 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the system averages 119 FPS, with a minimum of 101 FPS and a maximum of 137 FPS.