Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Palworld
Survival 2024

Palworld

83%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
130 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
61 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
85 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
40 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
47 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
22 FPS
12.3ms Frame Time
18ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,522
Your CPU 70,163
Graphics Card
Required 27,862
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 22 30 38 47
1440p QHD 40 53 69 85
1080p Full HD 61 81 105 130

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 81
1920x1080 Low 130
1920x1080 Medium 105
1920x1080 Ultra 61
2560x1440 High 53
2560x1440 Low 85
2560x1440 Medium 69
2560x1440 Ultra 40
3840x2160 High 30
3840x2160 Low 47
3840x2160 Medium 38
3840x2160 Ultra 22

Performance Analysis: Palworld on Your System

The Intel Core i7-14700KF and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a highly playable experience in Palworld at 1080p and 1440p, but falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K. Benchmark data shows a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions: the system hits a 130 FPS average at 1080p Low, drops to 85 FPS at 1440p Low, and manages only 47 FPS at 2160p Low. The most demanding preset tested, Ultra, yields 61 FPS at 1080p, 40 FPS at 1440p, and 22 FPS at 4K, indicating that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates for this CPU-GPU pairing reveal a steep performance cliff as resolution scales upward. At 1920x1080, the system handles all presets with room to spare: Low settings produce an average of 130 FPS, Medium delivers 105 FPS with a minimum of 89 FPS and maximum of 121 FPS, High reaches 81 FPS, and Ultra still holds at 61 FPS. This is the only resolution where every preset clears the playable threshold of 60 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages drop by roughly 35-40% across the board. Low settings yield 85 FPS, Medium averages 69 FPS with a minimum of 59 FPS and maximum of 80 FPS, High falls to 53 FPS, and Ultra drops to 40 FPS. The Medium preset sits right at the edge of playability, with its minimum dipping one frame below 60 FPS, while High and Ultra fall clearly short of the mark.

At 3840x2160, performance degrades substantially. Low settings average 47 FPS, Medium averages 38 FPS with a minimum of 33 FPS and maximum of 44 FPS, High drops to 30 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 22 FPS. None of the 4K presets come close to sustaining 60 FPS, and even the best-case minimum at Medium (33 FPS) indicates significant frame time variance that would be noticeable during gameplay.

The frame pacing data at Medium settings shows an interesting pattern: at 1080p, the minimum of 89 FPS is only 16 FPS below the average of 105 FPS, suggesting good consistency. At 1440p, the minimum of 59 FPS is just 10 FPS below the average of 69 FPS, but the maximum of 80 FPS shows a wider spread. At 4K, the gap between minimum (33 FPS) and maximum (44 FPS) narrows to 11 FPS, but the absolute values are far too low for smooth gameplay.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the best playable preset is Ultra, which averages 61 FPS. This is the most demanding configuration that still clears the 60 FPS threshold, making it the optimal choice for visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. The headroom above the threshold is minimal—just one frame—so players prioritizing stability might prefer High at 81 FPS, but the data confirms Ultra is technically playable.

For 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, averaging 69 FPS. This preset delivers a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS target, though its minimum of 59 FPS means occasional dips below threshold are possible. High settings at 53 FPS and Ultra at 40 FPS are not viable for consistent 60 FPS gameplay, so Medium represents the upper limit of what this hardware can sustain at 1440p.

At 3840x2160, no preset achieves 60 FPS. The closest option is Low at 47 FPS, but since the playable threshold is defined as 60 FPS, there is no best playable setting at this resolution. The data shows 4K is effectively out of reach for this combination, regardless of visual fidelity choices.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals that the Intel Arc B570 GPU is the dominant performance limiter in Palworld. At 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to push frame rates to 130 FPS at Low settings, indicating the processor is not the bottleneck at this resolution. The i7-14700KF's strong multi-threaded performance—evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,167 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 52,425—provides ample processing power for the game's simulation workloads.

However, the GPU's capabilities cap out quickly as resolution increases. The Arc B570's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus with 380 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K results show a clear bandwidth and compute limitation. The 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 200.0 GPixel/s pixel rate are simply insufficient for the pixel fill demands at 3840x2160.

The delta between Low and Ultra presets at each resolution quantifies the GPU's workload scaling. At 1080p, the spread from 130 FPS (Low) to 61 FPS (Ultra) is 69 FPS, or roughly 53% performance loss from the lowest to highest preset. At 1440p, the spread narrows to 45 FPS (85 to 40), and at 4K, it narrows to 25 FPS (47 to 22). This compression at higher resolutions indicates the GPU is becoming fully saturated, with less headroom to absorb additional shading and texture work.

The CPU's role becomes more evident at lower resolutions and presets. At 1080p Low, the 130 FPS average suggests the i7-14700KF is capable of feeding the GPU at high frame rates, especially given its 5.60 GHz boost clock and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The 20 cores and 28 threads provide strong parallel processing for Palworld's survival mechanics, which typically involve many simultaneous entity updates.

The Verdict

This system can run Palworld at 60 FPS or higher at 1920x1080 with all presets, including Ultra at 61 FPS. At 2560x1440, it maintains playability with Low (85 FPS) and Medium (69 FPS) settings, but High and Ultra fall below the threshold. At 3840x2160, no preset achieves 60 FPS, with the best option being Low at 47 FPS.

The verdict by resolution is clear: 1080p is fully playable with maximum settings, 1440p is playable with reduced settings, and 4K is not playable. The combination rank of 2985 out of 3,711 tested combinations places this pairing in the lower half of all possible CPU-GPU combos for this game, consistent with the GPU's 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs.

For gamers targeting 1080p, this system offers excellent performance with the ability to max out all settings. For 1440p users, Medium settings provide a good balance of visual quality and frame rate, though the 59 FPS minimum means brief dips are possible. 4K gaming with this hardware is not recommended, as the performance falls well short of the 60 FPS target even at the lowest settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Arc B570's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks are very close in average score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20,534 (0.1% lower), the Intel Arc A750 scores 20,582 (0.1% higher), the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20,480 (0.4% lower), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20,662 (0.5% higher). These delta percentages are all within one percent, meaning any of these GPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Palworld at the tested settings.

On the CPU side, the Intel Core i7-14700KF's nearest rivals are similarly clustered. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69,996 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69,875 (0.4% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69,515 (0.9% higher), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K scores 70,879 (1.0% lower). These processors would all provide equivalent CPU throughput for Palworld, meaning the game's frame rates would be dictated almost entirely by the GPU choice.

When combined, these rivals suggest that swapping the i7-14700KF for any of the four listed CPUs, or the Arc B570 for any of the four listed GPUs, would yield benchmark results within roughly one percent of the tested configuration. The practical implication is that frame rates in Palworld would be virtually identical, with differences of 1-2 FPS at most across all tested resolutions and presets.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Palworld at 4K with playable frame rates?*

A: No. At 3840x2160, the best average FPS is 47 at Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium averages 38 FPS, High averages 30 FPS, and Ultra averages 22 FPS.

Q: What is the highest quality preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: Medium settings at 2560x1440 average 69 FPS, making it the best playable preset at that resolution. Its minimum of 59 FPS is just below the threshold, while High (53 FPS) and Ultra (40 FPS) fall short.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its closest GPU rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Arc B570's average benchmark score is 20,556. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A750, scores 20,582, which is 0.1% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20,534 (0.1% lower), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20,662 (0.5% higher).

Q: What frame rate does the system achieve at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 61, which just clears the 60 FPS threshold for playability. This makes Ultra the best playable preset at 1080p.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to limit performance at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the CPU has sufficient headroom, as evidenced by the 130 FPS average at Low settings. The GPU becomes the limiting factor when increasing presets, with Ultra dropping to 61 FPS.

*Q: What is the system's overall rank among tested configurations for Palworld?*

A: This CPU-GPU combination ranks 2985 out of 3,711 total tested combos, placing it in the lower half of all configurations. This reflects the GPU's mid-range positioning rather than the CPU's high-end performance.