Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Palworld
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 24 | 35 | 43 | 55 |
| 1440p QHD | 47 | 63 | 80 | 96 |
| 1080p Full HD | 72 | 92 | 116 | 146 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Palworld on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a wide spread of performance in Palworld, ranging from a slideshow-like 23.6 FPS at 4K Ultra to a very fluid 146.2 FPS at 1080p Low. The data reveals a system where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the powerful 20-core CPU ensures that even the most demanding settings at 1080p remain playable. This analysis breaks down the measured frame rates, contextualizes the combo's rank, and determines exactly which settings and resolutions clear the 60 FPS threshold.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for this combination shows a clear and consistent scaling pattern across the three tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Arc B580 is able to stretch its legs, producing an average of 146.2 FPS on Low settings. Moving up to Medium settings, the average drops to 115.5 FPS, a reduction of 30.7 FPS from Low. High settings at 1080p yield an average of 91.6 FPS, and the most demanding Ultra preset still maintains an average of 71.9 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The data shows a smooth, predictable decline in performance as visual fidelity increases, with a 74.3 FPS difference between the lowest and highest presets at this resolution.
Stepping up to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong but the impact of the higher pixel count becomes evident. The Low preset averages 95.8 FPS, which is a substantial 50.4 FPS drop from the 1080p Low result. Medium settings at 1440p produce an average of 80 FPS, while High settings manage 63.1 FPS. The Ultra preset, however, falls below the playable threshold with an average of 47.2 FPS. This represents a 48.6 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution, indicating that the GPU's fill rate is becoming a more significant factor.
At 3840x2160, the Arc B580's limitations are fully exposed. The Low preset averages 54.5 FPS, which is technically below the 60 FPS target, while Medium drops to 43.3 FPS. High settings yield a mere 34.7 FPS, and Ultra falls to 23.6 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is severe; for instance, the High preset loses 28.4 FPS when moving from 1440p (63.1 FPS) to 4K (34.7 FPS). The performance delta between 1080p and 4K at the High preset is 56.9 FPS, highlighting the massive computational load increase at the highest resolution.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations for Palworld, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i7-14700K and Intel Arc B580 ranks 2786 out of 3711 combos. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, which is a critical context for understanding its performance ceiling. The rank suggests that while the combination is far from the weakest, it does not deliver the top-tier frame rates seen with more balanced or higher-end GPU pairings. The percentile position, combined with the measured data, implies that the system is suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and solid 60 FPS gaming at 1440p, but it is not a high-end 4K machine for this particular title.
The rank of 2786 out of 3711 means that 925 other tested combinations performed worse, but a substantial 2785 combos performed better. This data point is useful for setting expectations. It is not a reflection of a broken or severely underperforming pair, but rather an indication that the Arc B580 is the limiting factor in this duo. The i7-14700K is a top-tier processor, ranking in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, but the GPU's 68th percentile ranking among all GPUs drags the combined score down in a game that is heavily reliant on rasterization performance.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data strongly suggests that the Intel Arc B580 is the primary determinant of frame rates in Palworld, especially as resolution increases. The evidence lies in the dramatic FPS drops when moving from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K. For example, the Low preset loses 50.4 FPS when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and then loses another 41.3 FPS moving from 1440p to 4K. This progressive decline is typical of a GPU-bound scenario, where the graphics card cannot keep up with the increasing pixel shading workload.
Conversely, the CPU's role is more pronounced at lower resolutions where the GPU is less burdened. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 74.3 FPS, which is a larger absolute gap than at 1440p (48.6 FPS) or 4K (30.9 FPS). This suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU enough data to hit high frame rates, and the performance scaling is more directly tied to the GPU's ability to render the scene at different quality settings. The i7-14700K, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, is unlikely to be a bottleneck at any of these settings, as even the lowest 1080p result of 146.2 FPS is a high load that the CPU can sustain.
The data implies a classic balance shift. At 1080p, the system is more balanced, with the CPU able to push the GPU to its limits. At 1440p, the GPU starts to become the clear limiting factor, and at 4K, the GPU is entirely overwhelmed. The fact that the CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 9 7940HX, with performance deltas of -0.2% and -0.7% respectively, confirms that the i7-14700K is not the source of any performance deficit in this pairing.
The Verdict
The question of whether this PC can run Palworld is answered with a definitive yes, but with specific caveats regarding resolution and settings. According to the verdict data, this system is not considered playable at 3840x2160 under any of the tested presets, as none of the settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) achieve an average of 60 FPS or higher.
At 2560x1440, the system is playable on High, Medium, and Low settings. The High preset is the best playable option, achieving an average of 63.1 FPS, which just barely clears the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 1440p is not playable, with an average of 47.2 FPS.
At 1920x1080, the system is playable on all four tested presets, including Ultra. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 71.9 FPS, making it the best visual quality option that maintains a smooth frame rate. The data shows that this combination is a solid 1080p machine capable of maxing out the game's settings, and a competent 1440p machine when settings are dialed back from the absolute maximum.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For users considering this combination, the nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide context on comparable performance. The Intel Core i7-14700K has an average benchmark score of 69355, which is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69515) and the AMD EPYC 9115 (69288). The deltaPct values are minimal (-0.2% and 0.1% respectively), meaning these processors would deliver virtually identical CPU-bound performance in Palworld.
On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B580's average score of 23021 is closely matched by the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, which scores 22895 with a deltaPct of 0.6%. This suggests that a system with an RTX 2080 would produce very similar frame rates in this game. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23061) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23172) are also within a 1% performance delta, indicating that these disparate GPUs all fall into the same performance tier for this workload. A user with an RTX 3080 would expect nearly identical results, despite the significant generational difference in other applications.
Best Settings per Resolution
The ideal settings for this combination, based on the measured data, aim to maximize visual quality while maintaining an average of at least 60 FPS. At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that achieves this goal is Ultra, which produces an average of 71.9 FPS. This is the clear recommendation for 1080p, as it offers the full visual experience without dropping below the playable threshold.
At 2560x1440, the most demanding playable preset is High, which averages 63.1 FPS. While this is only 3.1 FPS above the 60 FPS target, the data shows it is a stable average. The Medium preset (80 FPS) and Low preset (95.8 FPS) are also playable, but High provides the best balance of quality and performance. Users who prefer a larger FPS buffer might choose Medium, but High is the highest quality option that is technically playable.
For 3840x2160, no settings are playable, meaning there is no best setting recommendation. The highest average FPS achieved at 4K is 54.5 FPS on Low, which falls short of the 60 FPS target. Therefore, users targeting 4K with this hardware would need to accept sub-60 FPS performance or consider lowering the resolution.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Palworld at 4K resolution?
A: No, the data shows that no settings preset at 3840x2160 reaches the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest average FPS is 54.5 on Low settings, which is below the playable threshold of 60 FPS. The Ultra preset averages only 23.6 FPS.
Q: What is the best setting for 1080p gaming with this hardware?
A: The Ultra preset is the most demanding setting that stays at or above 60 FPS at 1920x1080, achieving an average of 71.9 FPS. This provides the highest visual quality while remaining playable.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p?
A: The performance loss depends on the settings. At the High preset, the average FPS drops from 91.6 at 1080p to 63.1 at 1440p, a reduction of 28.5 FPS. At the Low preset, the drop is 50.4 FPS, from 146.2 to 95.8.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor for this game?
A: The benchmark data indicates the Intel Arc B580 is the primary limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions. The FPS drops significantly from 1080p to 1440p and again to 4K, which is a classic sign of GPU bottlenecking. The CPU, which ranks in the 94th percentile, is likely capable of supporting higher frame rates if the GPU were faster.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B580 compare to an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080?
A: The average benchmark scores are very close, with the Arc B580 scoring 23021 and the RTX 2080 scoring 22895. The deltaPct is 0.6%, indicating that the Arc B580 is slightly faster, but the difference is negligible and would result in nearly identical frame rates in Palworld.
Q: Which 1440p settings are playable with this combination?
A: High, Medium, and Low settings are all playable at 2560x1440. The High preset averages 63.1 FPS, Medium averages 80 FPS, and Low averages 95.8 FPS. The Ultra preset is not playable, averaging 47.2 FPS.