Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Palworld
Survival 2024

Palworld

83%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
130 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
61 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
85 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
40 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
47 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
22 FPS
12.3ms Frame Time
18ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,522
Your CPU 69,355
Graphics Card
Required 27,862
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 22 30 38 47
1440p QHD 40 53 69 85
1080p Full HD 61 81 105 130

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 81
1920x1080 Low 130
1920x1080 Medium 105
1920x1080 Ultra 61
2560x1440 High 53
2560x1440 Low 85
2560x1440 Medium 69
2560x1440 Ultra 40
3840x2160 High 30
3840x2160 Low 47
3840x2160 Medium 38
3840x2160 Ultra 22

Performance Analysis: Palworld on Your System

The Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a playable Palworld experience at 1080p and 1440p, but falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K. Benchmark results show this combination hitting 61 FPS at 1080p Ultra, 69 FPS at 1440p Medium, and failing to reach 60 FPS at any 4K preset. The CPU is a top-tier performer ranking in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 65th percentile, making the graphics card the clear bottleneck in this pairing.

FAQ

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1080p for this combo?

A: Ultra settings produce an average of 61 FPS at 1920x1080, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the most demanding preset that remains playable at this resolution.

Q: Can this system run Palworld at 1440p with high settings?

A: No. High settings at 2560x1440 average 53 FPS, below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings at 1440p average 69 FPS, making Medium the highest playable preset at this resolution.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?

A: Not at playable frame rates. The best 4K result is Low settings at 47 FPS, which still falls short of 60 FPS. High settings at 4K drop to 30 FPS, and Ultra yields only 22 FPS.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc B570 scores 20,556 on average benchmarks, placing it 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534) and 0.1% behind the Intel Arc A750 (20,582). It also outperforms the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M by 0.4% and trails the AMD Radeon R9 M390X by 0.5%.

Q: What is the CPU's benchmark position relative to its closest competitors?

A: The Core i7-14700K averages 69,355 across benchmarks, ranking 94th percentile among all CPUs. It performs 0.1% better than the AMD EPYC 9115 (69,288) and 0.2% better than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69,515), while trailing the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX by 0.7% and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F by 0.9%.

Q: What frame rates does the combo achieve at 1080p Medium?

A: Medium settings at 1920x1080 produce an average of 105 FPS, with minimums of 89 FPS and maximums of 121 FPS. This represents a comfortable margin above the playable threshold.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data clearly indicates that the GPU limits performance in Palworld across all tested resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU drives frame rates from 61 FPS at Ultra to 130 FPS at Low, demonstrating substantial headroom. Moving to 1440p, the same settings show frame rates dropping to 40 FPS at Ultra and 85 FPS at Low, a reduction that points to GPU-bound rendering. At 4K, the pattern intensifies: Ultra falls to 22 FPS, and even Low only reaches 47 FPS.

The scaling between resolutions reveals the GPU workload dominates. Between 1080p and 1440p, the average frame rate across all presets drops by roughly 35%, while between 1440p and 4K, the drop approaches 45%. These reductions correlate with pixel count increases, suggesting the Arc B570's rendering throughput is the limiting factor. The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads, with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, provide ample processing power for the game's simulation and AI systems, as evidenced by the 94th percentile ranking.

Preset scaling further confirms the GPU bottleneck. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces frame rates from 130 FPS to 61 FPS, a 53% decline. At 1440p, the same preset change drops performance from 85 FPS to 40 FPS, a 53% decline. At 4K, Low to Ultra goes from 47 FPS to 22 FPS, a 53% decline. The consistent percentage reduction across resolutions indicates that the GPU's shading units, texture mapping units, and raster operations processors are saturated, while the CPU remains underutilized in this workload.

The Intel Arc B570's specifications support this interpretation. With 2,304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, the GPU delivers 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. Its 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus provides 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. These figures place it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, a mid-range position that explains why higher resolutions and presets overwhelm its capabilities.

At 1080p, the CPU's strengths become visible. The i7-14700K's single-thread performance, scoring 2,160 in Cinebench R23 and 4,472 in Passmark single-thread tests, ensures that frame pacing remains consistent. The game's world simulation, which includes creature AI and physics, benefits from the 33 MB of L3 cache and the processor's high boost clock. However, these advantages cannot compensate for the GPU's limits at higher resolutions.

The 1440p results illustrate the transition point. Medium settings at 2560x1440 average 69 FPS, with minimums of 59 FPS and maximums of 80 FPS. This preset balances the GPU's compute load with visual quality, allowing the CPU to feed frames efficiently. High settings at the same resolution drop to 53 FPS, indicating that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth become insufficient beyond Medium.

At 4K, the GPU's 160-bit memory bus becomes a significant constraint. The 380.0 GB/s bandwidth cannot sustain the texture and geometry throughput required by 3840x2160 rendering, even at Low settings where the average is only 47 FPS. The CPU's role diminishes further, as frame rates are dictated entirely by GPU processing speed.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, Ultra settings deliver an average of 61 FPS, which is the most demanding preset that maintains playability. This configuration achieves 61 FPS on average, just above the 60 FPS threshold. High settings at 1080p produce 81 FPS, Medium reaches 105 FPS, and Low hits 130 FPS, all comfortably playable.

For 2560x1440, Medium is the highest playable preset with an average of 69 FPS. This setting shows a minimum of 59 FPS and a maximum of 80 FPS, indicating some frame dips below the threshold but maintaining an overall playable experience. High settings at 1440p average 53 FPS, which fails to meet the 60 FPS requirement. Low settings at 1440p reach 85 FPS, providing a smoother experience for players prioritizing frame rate over visual fidelity.

At 3840x2160, no preset achieves the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings average 47 FPS, Medium averages 38 FPS with minimums of 33 FPS and maximums of 44 FPS, High averages 30 FPS, and Ultra averages 22 FPS. The verdict for 4K lists no playable settings, meaning players must reduce resolution or accept sub-60 FPS performance.

The measured FPS data shows consistent behavior across resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the minimum of 89 FPS and maximum of 121 FPS indicate stable performance with minimal variance. At 1440p Medium, the 59 FPS minimum occasionally dips below the threshold, but the 69 FPS average maintains playability. At 4K Medium, the 33 FPS minimum confirms the GPU's inability to handle 4K rendering.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i7-14700K's nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 9115, which scores 69,288 in average benchmarks, a 0.1% difference from the i7-14700K's 69,355. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69,515, performing 0.2% better. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX achieves 69,875, a 0.7% advantage, while the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69,996, 0.9% higher. These processors would produce nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Palworld, meaning the game's frame rates at lower resolutions would remain similar.

For the Intel Arc B570, the closest GPU rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20,534 in average benchmarks, just 0.1% behind the Arc B570's 20,556. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20,582, performing 0.1% better. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20,480, a 0.4% deficit, while the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20,662, a 0.5% advantage. Systems using any of these GPUs would experience nearly identical frame rates in Palworld at the same settings and resolutions.

The combination of any of these rival CPUs with the Arc B570 would shift performance minimally. A system with the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, which scores 0.9% higher in CPU benchmarks, might show marginal improvements in CPU-limited scenarios like 1080p Low, where the i7-14700K achieves 130 FPS. However, at 4K, where the GPU is the bottleneck, these CPU differences would have no measurable impact on frame rates.

Similarly, swapping the Arc B570 for the AMD Radeon R9 M390X, which scores 0.5% higher, would produce slightly better GPU performance. This could potentially push 1440p High from 53 FPS to roughly 53 FPS, still below the 60 FPS threshold. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, being 0.1% slower, would yield nearly identical results across all resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

This combo ranks 2,985 out of 3,711 tested combinations in Palworld, placing it in the bottom 20% of all systems evaluated. The ranking reflects the GPU's mid-range position (65th percentile) combined with the CPU's high-end position (94th percentile). The 726-combo gap between this system and the top performers indicates substantial performance differences exist with other hardware pairings.

The rank suggests that while the CPU is capable of high frame rates, the GPU limits the overall system to mid-range performance. Many other combos in the database likely feature more powerful GPUs paired with similar or weaker CPUs, allowing them to achieve higher frame rates in Palworld. The data shows that the Arc B570's 65th percentile GPU ranking is the primary factor dragging the combo down.

The 4K results contribute significantly to this ranking. With no playable settings at 3840x2160, this combo cannot handle high-resolution gaming, which many other systems in the database can achieve. At 1440p, only two of four presets are playable, further limiting the system's versatility. The 1080p results, while playable at all presets, do not distinguish this combo from systems with stronger GPUs.

The Verdict

This PC can run Palworld at playable frame rates for 1080p and 1440p gaming. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra achieving 61 FPS, High reaching 81 FPS, Medium hitting 105 FPS, and Low delivering 130 FPS. The best setting at this resolution is Ultra, which provides the highest visual quality while maintaining playability.

At 2560x1440, the system offers two playable presets: Low at 85 FPS and Medium at 69 FPS. The best setting is Medium, which achieves 69 FPS with minimums of 59 FPS and maximums of 80 FPS. Players seeking higher visual fidelity at 1440p must accept frame rates below 60 FPS, as High averages 53 FPS and Ultra averages 40 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system cannot maintain 60 FPS at any setting. The best result is Low at 47 FPS, followed by Medium at 38 FPS, High at 30 FPS, and Ultra at 22 FPS. For 4K gaming, this combo is not suitable, and players should use 1440p or 1080p instead.

The Intel Core i7-14700K provides ample CPU performance for Palworld, with its 20 cores and 28 threads ensuring smooth gameplay in simulation-heavy scenarios. The Intel Arc B570, while sufficient for 1080p and 1440p Medium, becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings. Players targeting 60 FPS should use Ultra at 1080p or Medium at 1440p, while those with 4K displays should consider lower resolutions or different hardware. The system's overall ranking of 2,985 out of 3,711 reflects its mid-range GPU performance, but for 1080p and 1440p gaming, this combo delivers a solid experience.