Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Palworld
Survival 2024

Palworld

87%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
144 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
71 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
93 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
43 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
50 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
25 FPS
10.9ms Frame Time
16ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,522
Your CPU 53,620
Graphics Card
Required 27,862
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 25 33 45 50
1440p QHD 43 62 77 93
1080p Full HD 71 92 118 144

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 92
1920x1080 Low 144
1920x1080 Medium 118
1920x1080 Ultra 71
2560x1440 High 62
2560x1440 Low 93
2560x1440 Medium 77
2560x1440 Ultra 43
3840x2160 High 33
3840x2160 Low 50
3840x2160 Medium 45
3840x2160 Ultra 25

Performance Analysis: Palworld on Your System

The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a solid 1080p and 1440p experience in Palworld, but it is not a 4K-capable combination. At 1920x1080, the combo achieves playable frame rates across all tested presets, with the Ultra preset averaging 70.9 FPS. At 2560x1440, the High preset is the ceiling for smooth gameplay at 61.8 FPS average. The data clearly shows that 3840x2160 is out of reach, with even the Low preset failing to hit the 60 FPS playable threshold, averaging only 50.4 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates for this combination in Palworld show a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the Low preset produces an average of 144.4 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded for this combo. Medium settings at 1080p yield 118.2 FPS average, while High settings drop to 91.8 FPS average. The Ultra preset at 1080p still maintains a comfortable 70.9 FPS average, confirming that this resolution is fully playable at maximum quality.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably. The Low preset averages 93.4 FPS, which remains well above the playable threshold. Medium settings at 1440p average 76.8 FPS, and High settings average 61.8 FPS — just barely clearing the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 1440p falls below playability, averaging only 42.5 FPS. This indicates that users targeting 1440p must choose between High and Ultra, with High being the only quality setting that maintains smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the combination struggles across all presets. The Low preset averages 50.4 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings average 45.2 FPS, High settings drop to 32.6 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 25.2 FPS. None of the 4K presets reach playable frame rates, making 4K resolution impractical for this hardware configuration in Palworld.

The scaling between resolutions reveals a steep performance cost for higher pixel counts. From 1080p to 1440p at High settings, the frame rate drops from 91.8 to 61.8 FPS, a reduction of approximately 33%. From 1440p to 4K at High settings, the frame rate plummets from 61.8 to 32.6 FPS, a further reduction of about 47%. This pattern holds across all presets, indicating that the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck at higher resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i7-14700F sits close to several other CPUs in synthetic benchmark performance. The nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6505P, scores 53701 compared to the i7-14700F's 53620, a negligible delta of -0.2%. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469, just 0.3% behind the i7-14700F. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288, trailing by 0.6%, while the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206, a 0.8% deficit. These deltas are all within one percent, meaning any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Palworld.

For the GPU side, the Intel Arc B580's nearest rivals include some unexpected names. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23061, just 0.2% ahead of the Arc B580's 23021. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, which is 0.6% behind the Arc B580. Interestingly, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172, only 0.7% ahead, and the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, a 1% lead. These small deltas suggest that in pure GPU benchmark terms, the Arc B580 performs within a tight window of these very different cards.

In practical terms for Palworld, users with any of these rival CPUs paired with the Arc B580 would see nearly identical frame rates at each resolution and preset. The CPU is not the limiting factor in this game at the tested settings, based on the minimal benchmark deltas. Similarly, the GPU alternatives listed would produce frame rates within a few percentage points of the Arc B580, meaning the overall gameplay experience would be indistinguishable in terms of average FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data indicates that the GPU is the primary performance determinant for Palworld across all tested resolutions. This conclusion stems from the dramatic frame rate drops as resolution increases, which is characteristic of GPU-bound workloads. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 144.4 FPS, but at 4K Low it drops to 50.4 FPS — a 65% reduction. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the resolution scaling would be much flatter.

The CPU's role becomes more relevant at lower resolutions and higher frame rates. At 1080p Low, the system produces 144.4 FPS average, which is high enough that CPU overhead could start to matter. However, the i7-14700F's strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 and PassMark multithread score of 41317, suggests it has ample headroom for this game's demands. The CPU ranks in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, indicating it is far more capable than what Palworld requires at these settings.

The scaling from Medium to Ultra at each resolution shows consistent GPU-bound behavior. At 1080p, the frame rate drops from 118.2 at Medium to 70.9 at Ultra, a 40% reduction. At 1440p, the same preset change yields a drop from 76.8 to 42.5, a 45% reduction. At 4K, Medium averages 45.2 while Ultra averages 25.2, a 44% reduction. The consistent percentage drops across resolutions confirm that graphical settings impact the GPU workload uniformly, with no sudden CPU-related cliff.

The verdict data reinforces this interpretation. At 1080p, all four presets are playable, with Ultra achieving 70.9 FPS. At 1440p, three presets are playable, capped at High with 61.8 FPS. At 4K, zero presets are playable. This staircase pattern is typical of a GPU-limited system where the CPU can handle the game logic but the GPU cannot keep up with pixel throughput at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Can this combination run Palworld at 4K resolution?

A: No. The measured data shows no playable settings at 3840x2160. The best result is the Low preset at 50.4 FPS average, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The Ultra preset at 4K averages only 25.2 FPS.

Q: What is the best quality setting for 1440p gameplay?

A: The High preset is the most demanding setting that maintains playability at 2560x1440, averaging 61.8 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 42.5 FPS average, which is not playable.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p at High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 High, the average frame rate is 91.8 FPS. At 2560x1440 High, it drops to 61.8 FPS. This represents a reduction of approximately 30 FPS, or about 33% lower performance.

Q: Is the Ultra preset playable at any resolution with this combo?

A: Yes, but only at 1920x1080. The Ultra preset at 1080p averages 70.9 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. At 1440p Ultra averages 42.5 FPS, and at 4K Ultra averages 25.2 FPS, both unplayable.

Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to its closest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc B580's average benchmark score is 23021. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23061 (0.2% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895 (0.6% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172 (0.7% ahead), and the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249 (1% ahead). These differences are minimal.

Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The measured average at 1920x1080 Medium is 118.2 FPS. This is well above the playable threshold and offers a significant improvement over Ultra settings, which average 70.9 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i7-14700F and Intel Arc B580 combination ranks 2842 out of 3711 tested combos in Palworld. This places it in the lower portion of the ranking, at approximately the 23rd percentile of all tested hardware combinations. This ranking is consistent with the measured performance data, which shows the combo is capable at 1080p and 1440p but fails at 4K.

The ranking reflects the Arc B580's position as a mid-range GPU. The GPU's percentile vs all GPUs is 68, meaning it outperforms 68% of tested GPUs in synthetic benchmarks. However, the combo's rank in Palworld is lower than that percentile would suggest, indicating that this specific game may be more demanding than average or that the combination does not scale as well in this title.

The CPU's strong benchmark position — 91st percentile vs all CPUs — does not boost the combo's rank in Palworld, confirming that the GPU is the limiting factor. The i7-14700F's high multi-core scores, including a PassMark multithread score of 41317 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 19620, provide ample computational headroom that the game does not fully utilize.

Given that the combo sits at rank 2842 of 3711, there are 869 tested combinations that perform worse and 2841 that perform better. This places the combo in the lower third of all tested configurations, which aligns with the inability to achieve playable frame rates at 4K resolution.

Best Settings per Resolution

1920x1080: The Ultra preset is the most demanding setting that stays at or above 60 FPS, averaging 70.9 FPS. This provides the highest visual quality while maintaining smooth gameplay at this resolution.

2560x1440: The High preset is the most demanding playable setting, averaging 61.8 FPS. This is just above the 60 FPS threshold, so users seeking more headroom could drop to Medium for 76.8 FPS average.

3840x2160: No settings are playable at this resolution. The best result is the Low preset at 50.4 FPS average, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold. The verdict data confirms there are no playable settings at 4K.

For users prioritizing frame rate stability at 1440p, the Low preset at 93.4 FPS average offers the most margin above the playable threshold. At 1080p, the Low preset's 144.4 FPS average provides maximum performance, though the Ultra preset's 70.9 FPS average is still comfortably playable. The measured data shows that this combination is best suited for 1080p gaming, with 1440p requiring a trade-off between quality and smoothness.