Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Palworld
Survival 2024

Palworld

83%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
130 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
61 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
85 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
40 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
47 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
22 FPS
12.3ms Frame Time
18ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,522
Your CPU 53,620
Graphics Card
Required 27,862
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 22 30 38 47
1440p QHD 40 53 69 85
1080p Full HD 61 81 105 130

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 81
1920x1080 Low 130
1920x1080 Medium 105
1920x1080 Ultra 61
2560x1440 High 53
2560x1440 Low 85
2560x1440 Medium 69
2560x1440 Ultra 40
3840x2160 High 30
3840x2160 Low 47
3840x2160 Medium 38
3840x2160 Ultra 22

Performance Analysis: Palworld on Your System

The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the Intel Arc B570 presents a curious case for Palworld, a survival title that leans heavily on both CPU simulation and GPU rendering. The measured data reveals a system that is clearly capable at mainstream resolutions but hits a stark performance ceiling at 4K. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers a smooth experience across all tested presets, with the Ultra preset averaging 61 FPS, just clearing the 60 FPS playability threshold. Moving to 2560x1440, the system maintains playability through Medium settings, averaging 69 FPS, but the Ultra preset drops to 40 FPS, indicating a significant performance cliff. At 3840x2160, no settings reach the 60 FPS threshold, with even Low averaging only 47 FPS, confirming that this pairing is not suited for 4K gaming in this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data provides a clear picture of performance scaling across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system shows strong headroom: Low settings produce an average of 130 FPS, Medium averages 105 FPS with a minimum of 89 FPS and maximum of 121 FPS, High averages 81 FPS, and Ultra averages 61 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the combo can handle the most demanding preset while still maintaining a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold for most of the frame time.

Stepping up to 2560x1440, the performance drop is noticeable but not catastrophic. Low settings average 85 FPS, Medium averages 69 FPS with a minimum of 59 FPS and maximum of 80 FPS, High averages 53 FPS, and Ultra falls to 40 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 59 FPS is notably close to the 60 FPS threshold, suggesting occasional dips below playability in demanding scenes. The gap between Medium and High at this resolution—16 FPS—is larger than the 24 FPS gap between Low and Medium, indicating that High settings introduce a significant rendering cost.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles across the board. Low settings average 47 FPS, Medium averages 38 FPS with a minimum of 33 FPS and maximum of 44 FPS, High averages 30 FPS, and Ultra averages 22 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is severe: High settings drop from 53 FPS to 30 FPS, a 43% reduction, while Medium drops from 69 FPS to 38 FPS, a 45% reduction. This suggests the Arc B570's 10 GB GDDR6 memory and 160-bit bus become a bottleneck at 4K, as the rendering load outpaces the GPU's bandwidth and compute resources.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Palworld at 60 FPS at 1920x1080?

A: Yes, all four tested presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—average at or above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 61 FPS, meaning the most demanding settings are playable at this resolution.

Q: What is the best playable preset at 2560x1440?

A: The Medium preset is the most demanding setting that stays playable, averaging 69 FPS. However, its minimum FPS of 59 FPS means there may be brief dips below the 60 FPS threshold in heavy scenes.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware in Palworld?

A: The data shows no playable settings at 3840x2160. Even Low settings average only 47 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playability threshold. Ultra averages just 22 FPS, making 4K unplayable with this combo.

Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to its closest GPU rival in raw performance?

A: The Arc B570's average benchmark score is 20556, which is 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile's 20534. It also sits 0.1% below the Intel Arc A750's 20582, indicating near-identical overall performance among these three GPUs.

Q: How does the Core i7-14700F compare to its closest CPU rival?

A: The Core i7-14700F's average benchmark score is 53620, which is 0.6% below the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X's 53288 score, meaning the Ryzen 9 7900X is slightly faster on average. The Intel Xeon 6505P is 0.2% faster, and the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 is 0.3% slower.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1920x1080?

A: Low averages 130 FPS while Ultra averages 61 FPS, a difference of 69 FPS. This shows that increasing visual quality from the lowest to highest preset cuts frame rate by more than half at 1080p.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i7-14700F, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, which scores 53288 and is 0.6% faster, and the Intel Xeon 6505P, which scores 53701 and is 0.2% faster. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469, making it 0.3% slower, and the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206, placing it 0.8% slower. In practical terms, swapping the CPU for any of these alternatives would yield nearly identical frame rates in Palworld, as the differences are under 1%.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B570's nearest rivals are the Intel Arc A750, which scores 20582 and is 0.1% faster, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20534 and is 0.1% slower. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, making it 0.4% slower, while the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, placing it 0.5% faster. These deltaPct values are all within half a percent, meaning any of these GPUs would produce nearly indistinguishable performance in Palworld. A user upgrading from an Arc A750 to an Arc B570 would see no meaningful FPS change, and the same applies to switching to a RTX 3070 Mobile.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that this system can run Palworld at 60 FPS, but only at certain resolution and preset combinations. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—achieve average frame rates above 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 61 FPS. This makes 1080p the sweet spot for this combo, allowing players to max out settings while maintaining playability. At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on Low and Medium settings, with Medium averaging 69 FPS as the best playable preset. High and Ultra fall short, averaging 53 FPS and 40 FPS respectively.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is clear: this system cannot run Palworld at a playable frame rate. The verdictByResolution data lists no playable settings at 4K, and the measured FPS confirms this—even Low averages only 47 FPS, which is 13 FPS below the 60 FPS threshold. For players targeting 4K, this pairing is unsuitable, and the data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor, as the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance cannot compensate for the rendering load at this resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The interplay between the Core i7-14700F and Arc B570 varies significantly by resolution. At 1920x1080, the GPU is likely the primary constraint, as frame rates scale dramatically with preset quality—from 130 FPS at Low to 61 FPS at Ultra. The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for Palworld's simulation and AI logic, but the rendering load at 1080p is low enough that the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The 69 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution highlights GPU-bound behavior.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts slightly. The Medium preset averages 69 FPS, but the minimum of 59 FPS suggests occasional CPU-driven stutters or GPU load spikes. The 16 FPS drop from Medium to High, compared to the 24 FPS drop from Low to Medium, indicates that High settings introduce new GPU effects that disproportionately impact performance. The CPU's role becomes more evident in maintaining minimum frame rates, as the 59 FPS minimum at Medium suggests the processor can keep up with the game's logic but may struggle during complex scenes.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is overwhelmingly the bottleneck. The 45% frame rate drop from 1440p Medium to 4K Medium (69 to 38 FPS) far exceeds what the CPU alone could cause, and the 10 GB memory buffer likely hits capacity limits. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4958 in Cinebench R23 and multi-thread score of 35122 indicate it is not the limiting factor here; rather, the Arc B570's 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for 4K rendering in this title.

How This Combo Ranks

Among all tested hardware combinations in the benchmark database, this pairing ranks 2985 out of 3711 combos for Palworld. This places it in the bottom 20% of tested systems, which is surprising given the individual component scores. The CPU ranks in the 91st percentile against all CPUs, and the GPU ranks in the 65th percentile against all GPUs, yet their combined performance in this game is relatively low. This discrepancy suggests that Palworld's optimization may favor certain hardware combinations, or that the Arc B570's driver maturity affects its real-world gaming performance compared to its synthetic benchmark scores.

The rank of 2985 out of 3711 indicates that most other tested combos deliver better frame rates in Palworld. This is likely due to the GPU's mid-tier positioning—the 65th percentile means roughly one-third of GPUs outperform it—combined with the game's demanding rendering at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the combo performs admirably, but its overall rank is dragged down by the poor 4K results. For context, the GPU's nearest rival, the RTX 3070 Mobile, would likely produce similar results, suggesting this rank reflects the GPU class rather than a specific deficiency in this pairing.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS is as follows:

  • 3840x2160: No playable settings. The highest average FPS is 47 at Low, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold.
  • 2560x1440: Medium is the best playable preset, averaging 69 FPS. Low averages 85 FPS, but Medium offers higher visual quality while staying above 60 FPS. The minimum of 59 FPS at Medium indicates occasional dips below the threshold.
  • 1920x1080: Ultra is the best playable preset, averaging 61 FPS. This allows players to use the maximum visual quality while maintaining playability. For users who prefer a safety margin, High averages 81 FPS, providing a 20 FPS buffer above the threshold.

These recommendations are based solely on the measured average FPS data. At 1080p Ultra, the 61 FPS average is tight against the threshold, so players sensitive to frame drops may prefer High for consistency. At 1440p Medium, the 59 FPS minimum suggests that the most demanding moments in Palworld—such as large base-building scenes or combat with multiple Pals—could cause temporary stutters, but the overall experience remains playable.