Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Palworld
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 23 | 35 | 44 | 56 |
| 1440p QHD | 43 | 62 | 81 | 99 |
| 1080p Full HD | 67 | 90 | 116 | 144 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Palworld on Your System
The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a solid 1080p and 1440p gaming experience in Palworld, but it falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K. At 1920x1080, the combination achieves 66.5 FPS on Ultra settings, while at 2560x1440 it reaches 61.5 FPS on High settings, making both resolutions viable for smooth gameplay. The data indicates that 4K resolutions are not playable, with even Low settings yielding only 55.7 FPS average.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combo in Palworld reveals a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the system performs admirably across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 143.8 FPS, Medium settings deliver 115.8 FPS, High settings reach 90.1 FPS, and Ultra settings still maintain a respectable 66.5 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a drop of 77.3 FPS, indicating that the highest preset costs roughly 54% of the performance headroom available at the lowest settings.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance becomes more constrained. Low settings yield 98.5 FPS, Medium settings drop to 80.7 FPS, High settings hit 61.5 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 42.9 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 55.6 FPS, which represents a 56% reduction. Notably, the step from High to Ultra at 1440p is particularly steep, with a drop of 18.6 FPS, suggesting that Ultra presets carry a significant rendering load at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low settings produce 55.7 FPS, Medium settings drop to 43.6 FPS, High settings fall to 35.4 FPS, and Ultra settings bottom out at 22.6 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 33.1 FPS, which represents a 59% performance loss. The data shows that even the lowest preset at 4K fails to reach the 60 FPS playable threshold, confirming that this combination is not suited for 4K gaming in Palworld.
Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent: each step up in settings reduces average FPS substantially. The largest relative penalty occurs when moving from Medium to High at 1440p, where the frame rate drops by 19.2 FPS (from 80.7 to 61.5). The smallest relative penalty occurs when moving from High to Ultra at 1080p, where the frame rate drops by 23.6 FPS (from 90.1 to 66.5). This suggests that the GPU has more headroom at lower resolutions to absorb the additional load from higher presets.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data indicates that the Intel Arc B580 is the primary bottleneck in this configuration, particularly at higher resolutions. The GPU's performance characteristics, including its 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, determine the frame rate ceiling in most scenarios. The CPU, with its 14 cores and 20 threads, provides ample processing power that does not appear to limit performance in any of the tested configurations.
The scaling between resolutions reveals how the GPU load changes. At 1080p, the system maintains 90.1 FPS on High settings, but at 1440p the same preset drops to 61.5 FPS, a 31.7% reduction. Moving from 1440p to 4K at High settings, the frame rate falls to 35.4 FPS, a 42.4% reduction. This progressive decline aligns with the traditional rendering load increase from higher pixel counts, indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor.
The CPU's performance metrics support this interpretation. The Intel Core i5-14600KF achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 and a single-core score of 4594, placing it in the 90th percentile among all CPUs. Its PassMark multi-thread score of 38697 further confirms its capability to handle game logic and draw calls without becoming a constraint. The fact that even at 1080p Low settings, where the CPU would face the least GPU-related pressure, the system reaches 143.8 FPS suggests the CPU can sustain high frame delivery.
The GPU's benchmark scores provide context for its role. The Arc B580 scores 15748 in PassMark G3D and 3068 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 68th percentile among all GPUs. These scores indicate a mid-range graphics processor that can handle modern titles at mainstream resolutions but lacks the raw throughput for 4K gaming. The GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides sufficient bandwidth for 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K Ultra preset's demands exceed its capabilities.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-14600KF provide context for its processing capability. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49228 in average benchmark, which is 0.3% lower than the i5-14600KF's 49394 average. This makes the Ryzen 9 7900 a nearly identical performer in synthetic tests. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49196, just 0.4% behind, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995, 0.8% behind. On the higher side, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores 49796, which is 0.8% ahead of the i5-14600KF. For Palworld specifically, any of these CPUs would likely produce similar frame rates given the same GPU, since the game does not appear to be CPU-bound in this configuration.
For the Intel Arc B580, the nearest GPU rivals show interesting performance parity. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23061, which is 0.2% higher than the Arc B580's 23021 average benchmark score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, 0.6% lower, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172, 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, 1% higher. These deltas are all within 1%, meaning that swapping to any of these GPUs would yield nearly identical frame rates in Palworld. A system with the i5-14600KF and any of these rival GPUs would likely deliver the same playability verdict: smooth at 1080p and 1440p, but not at 4K.
It is worth remembering the nearest rivals are based on aggregate benchmark scores, not game-specific performance. In Palworld, the actual frame rates could vary slightly due to driver optimizations and game-specific rendering paths. However, the close synthetic scores suggest that performance differences would be minimal in practice.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Palworld at 1920x1080 with playable frame rates?
A: Yes. The system achieves 66.5 FPS on Ultra settings, 90.1 FPS on High, 115.8 FPS on Medium, and 143.8 FPS on Low at 1080p. All presets clear the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best preset at 2560x1440 for maintaining 60 FPS?
A: High settings deliver 61.5 FPS average at 1440p, which is the highest preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. Medium settings produce 80.7 FPS and Low settings reach 98.5 FPS, but Ultra drops to 42.9 FPS.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware combination?
A: No. At 3840x2160, even Low settings only produce 55.7 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra settings yield 43.6, 35.4, and 22.6 FPS respectively, making 4K unplayable.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF scores 49394 average, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228), 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196), and 0.8% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48995). It is 0.8% lower than the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 (49796).
Q: What GPU performance tier does the Intel Arc B580 occupy?
A: The Arc B580 scores 23021 average benchmark, placing it in the 68th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23061, 0.2% higher), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895, 0.6% lower), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23172, 0.7% higher).
Q: What is the frame rate difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: High settings deliver 61.5 FPS while Ultra settings produce 42.9 FPS at 2560x1440. This represents an 18.6 FPS drop, which is a 30% reduction in performance for the Ultra preset.
The Verdict
This PC configuration can run Palworld successfully at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 resolutions, but not at 3840x2160. At 1080p, all four presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra settings achieving 66.5 FPS and Low settings reaching 143.8 FPS. At 1440p, High, Medium, and Low settings all remain above 60 FPS, with High being the most demanding playable preset at 61.5 FPS. The 4K resolution is entirely unplayable, as no preset reaches 60 FPS; the best result is 55.7 FPS on Low settings.
The verdict data confirms this assessment. For 1920x1080, the playable settings include High, Low, Medium, and Ultra, with the best settings being Ultra at 66.5 FPS. For 2560x1440, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with the best settings being High at 61.5 FPS. For 3840x2160, there are no playable settings, and the best settings field is null, indicating no preset meets the playability requirement.
The system's ranking within the database is 2836 out of 3711 total CPU-GPU combinations for this game, placing it in the lower-middle range. This ranking is consistent with the observed performance: capable at mainstream resolutions but not competitive at 4K. The GPU's 68th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 90th percentile ranking further emphasizes that the graphics card is the limiting factor in this pairing.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average frame rate of 66.5 FPS. This provides the maximum visual quality while still offering a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. Players seeking higher frame rates can drop to High for 90.1 FPS, Medium for 115.8 FPS, or Low for 143.8 FPS, but Ultra represents the best balance of visual fidelity and performance at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 61.5 FPS. This is a narrow margin over the threshold, leaving little headroom for demanding scenes. Medium settings provide a more comfortable 80.7 FPS, while Low settings reach 98.5 FPS. Ultra settings at 42.9 FPS do not meet the playability requirement.
At 3840x2160, no preset achieves 60 FPS, so there is no recommended best setting. Low settings come closest at 55.7 FPS, but this still falls below the playable threshold. Users with 4K displays should consider lowering the resolution or adjusting the GPU configuration, though the data does not support any 4K preset as playable for this combination.