Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Palworld
Survival 2024

Palworld

77%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
130 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
61 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
85 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
40 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
47 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
22 FPS
12.3ms Frame Time
18ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,522
Your CPU 32,279
Graphics Card
Required 27,862
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 22 30 38 47
1440p QHD 40 53 69 85
1080p Full HD 61 81 105 130

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 81
1920x1080 Low 130
1920x1080 Medium 105
1920x1080 Ultra 61
2560x1440 High 53
2560x1440 Low 85
2560x1440 Medium 69
2560x1440 Ultra 40
3840x2160 High 30
3840x2160 Low 47
3840x2160 Medium 38
3840x2160 Ultra 22

Performance Analysis: Palworld on Your System

The Intel Core i5-14400F and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a mixed bag in Palworld, with playability heavily dependent on resolution and graphics preset. At 1080p, the system is fully capable of running the game at maximum settings, while 1440p requires a step down to Medium, and 4K falls short of the 60 FPS threshold entirely. The measured data provides a clear picture of where this pairing excels and where it struggles.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160 (4K), the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates across all tested presets. On Low settings, the average FPS reaches 47, which is still below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings produce an average of 38 FPS, with minimum and maximum readings of 33 and 44 FPS respectively, indicating noticeable frame pacing issues. High settings drop the average further to 30 FPS, and Ultra settings bottom out at just 22 FPS. None of these results come close to providing a smooth experience at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440 (1440p), performance improves significantly but remains constrained at the higher presets. Low settings deliver a comfortable 85 FPS average, easily clearing the playable bar. Medium settings maintain an average of 69 FPS, with a minimum of 59 FPS and maximum of 80 FPS, meaning the frame rate occasionally dips just below the 60 FPS mark during demanding scenes. High settings drop to a 53 FPS average, which is below the playable threshold, while Ultra settings fall further to 40 FPS.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the system shows its best performance. Low settings produce an impressive 130 FPS average, providing a highly responsive experience. Medium settings maintain 105 FPS with a minimum of 89 FPS and maximum of 121 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay throughout. High settings still deliver a strong 81 FPS average, and even Ultra settings hold at 61 FPS, just clearing the playable threshold. The data shows a clear trend: the gap between presets narrows as resolution decreases, indicating that the GPU becomes less of a bottleneck at lower resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

Among the 3,711 tested CPU-GPU combinations in the benchmark database, this pairing ranks 2,985th for Palworld performance. This places it in the lower third of all tested configurations, reflecting that while it can handle the game at certain settings, many other combos deliver higher frame rates.

The CPU itself sits at the 83rd percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 32,279. Its nearest rivals in synthetic CPU benchmarks are closely matched: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U scores 32,233 (0.1% lower), the Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32,226 (0.2% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 32,354 (0.2% higher). The Intel Core i7-12800H trails slightly at 32,121, a 0.5% deficit. These narrow margins indicate that the i5-14400F offers compute performance comparable to several higher-tier mobile and older desktop chips.

The Intel Arc B570 GPU ranks at the 65th percentile among all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 20,556. Its closest competitors include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20,534 (0.1% lower), the Intel Arc A750 at 20,582 (0.1% higher), the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M at 20,480 (0.4% lower), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X at 20,662 (0.5% higher). The GPU's mid-tier standing aligns with the measured gaming results, which show it handling 1080p well but struggling at higher resolutions.

The combination of a strong CPU with a mid-range GPU explains the ranking. The processor provides ample headroom for game logic and physics, but the graphics card becomes the limiting factor as resolution and preset demands increase.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear division of labor between the Intel Core i5-14400F and the Intel Arc B570 across different resolutions. At 1080p, the GPU has enough bandwidth to feed frames quickly, allowing the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads to keep up with the game's simulation and AI workloads. The result is that even Ultra settings achieve 61 FPS, suggesting the CPU is not a bottleneck at this resolution.

As resolution increases to 1440p, the GPU workload grows, and the Arc B570 begins to show its limits. The drop from 85 FPS on Low to 69 FPS on Medium represents a 19% performance decrease, while the jump from Medium to High causes a 23% drop to 53 FPS. This scaling pattern indicates that the GPU is now the primary constraint, as the CPU's performance headroom cannot compensate for the increased pixel count.

At 4K, the GPU is heavily saturated. The difference between Low (47 FPS) and Medium (38 FPS) is a 19% reduction, and High settings cut performance by another 21% to 30 FPS. The Ultra preset at 22 FPS represents a 53% drop from Low settings, demonstrating that the Arc B570's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 160-bit bus width are insufficient for the demands of 4K rendering in this game.

The scaling between resolutions at the same preset further illustrates this dynamic. At Medium settings, performance drops from 105 FPS at 1080p to 69 FPS at 1440p (a 34% reduction) and then to 38 FPS at 4K (a further 45% reduction). This steep decline confirms that the GPU is the dominant factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU's role diminishes as pixel throughput becomes the limiting constraint.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Palworld at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: No. The measured data shows no playable settings at 3840x2160. Even on Low settings, the average FPS is 47, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra produce averages of 38, 30, and 22 FPS respectively.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: Medium is the highest preset that maintains an average above 60 FPS at 2560x1440, delivering 69 FPS. Low settings provide a higher 85 FPS average, but Medium offers the best balance of visual quality and performance among playable options.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance in Palworld?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor at 1440p and 4K, as evidenced by the significant frame rate drops when increasing presets or resolution. At 1080p, the CPU and GPU work well together, with all presets achieving at least 61 FPS, indicating the CPU has sufficient headroom for the game's demands.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc B570's average benchmark score of 20,556 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534, 0.1% lower) and the Intel Arc A750 (20,582, 0.1% higher). It also closely matches the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20,480, 0.4% lower) and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20,662, 0.5% higher).

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 81 FPS, which comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold. This provides a smooth experience for most gameplay scenarios.

Q: Is the Core i5-14400F a strong performer relative to other CPUs?

A: Yes, the processor sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 32,279 is within 0.5% of several competitors, including the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and Intel Core i7-12800H, indicating solid multi-threaded performance.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that remains at or above 60 FPS, achieving an average of 61 FPS. This allows players to experience the game with maximum visual fidelity while maintaining playable performance. Lower presets offer progressively higher frame rates, with High at 81 FPS, Medium at 105 FPS, and Low at 130 FPS.

For 2560x1440, Medium is the highest playable preset, delivering a 69 FPS average. While Low settings provide a higher 85 FPS average, the Medium preset strikes the optimal balance between visual quality and smoothness. High settings at 53 FPS and Ultra at 40 FPS are not recommended due to sub-60 FPS averages.

At 3840x2160, no preset achieves the 60 FPS playable threshold. The closest option is Low at 47 FPS, but even this falls short of smooth gameplay. Players seeking 4K performance would need to consider a more powerful GPU or accept reduced visual settings with frame rate drops.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i5-14400F and Intel Arc B570 combination can run Palworld, but the experience varies dramatically by resolution. At 1080p, the system is fully capable, with all four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold. Ultra settings at 61 FPS provide the best visual experience without sacrificing smoothness.

At 1440p, the system remains playable but requires compromises. Low and Medium presets both exceed 60 FPS, with Medium at 69 FPS offering the best visual quality among playable options. High and Ultra presets fall below the threshold and should be avoided for consistent performance.

At 4K, the system cannot achieve playable frame rates on any preset. The best result, 47 FPS on Low settings, still falls short of the 60 FPS target. Players with 4K displays would need to lower resolution or upgrade the GPU to achieve a satisfactory experience.

Overall, this pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming with high to ultra settings, or 1440p gaming with medium settings. The CPU provides ample compute power, but the GPU's mid-range performance limits the system's ability to handle higher resolutions and presets in Palworld. For gamers targeting 1080p, this combo delivers a smooth and visually rich experience; for those seeking 1440p or 4K, it requires careful settings management or hardware upgrades.