Palworld

Palworld, the survival game that blends creature collection with base building, demands a surprisingly capable system to run smoothly. For the combination of the Intel Core i5-10400F and the Intel Arc B390, the data paints a clear picture: this is a setup that can handle the game at 1080p with reduced settings, but it falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at higher resolutions. The benchmark results place this combo at rank 3297 out of 3711 tested configurations, indicating a performance level that sits in the lower quartile of systems. This pairing is heavily limited by the graphics processor, which records an average benchmark score of 1482 and sits at the 9th percentile among all GPUs, a clear indicator that the Arc B390 is the primary bottleneck for this title.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Palworld at 60 FPS on 1080p?

A: Yes, but only at Low or Medium settings. The recorded data shows an average of 84 FPS on Low and 68 FPS on Medium at 1920x1080. The High preset drops to 53 FPS, and Ultra falls to 40 FPS, both below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming with this combo?

A: According to the verdict data, there are no playable settings at 2560x1440. All presets, from Low to Ultra, produce average frame rates below 60 FPS. The highest average recorded is 56 FPS on Low, which still misses the playable mark.

Q: Is the Intel Arc B390 more like a discrete GPU or an integrated one?

A: The database classifies the Intel Arc B390 with a bus interface of "IGP" and a slot width of "IGP", indicating it functions as an integrated graphics processor. Its performance percentile of 9% and an average benchmark score of 1482 place it in a range comparable to older, entry-level discrete GPUs from NVIDIA, such as the GeForce GT 710 and GT 625 OEM.

Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-10400F has an average benchmark score of 14185, placing it at the 68th percentile among all CPUs. Its closest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6756E with a score of 14163 (0.2% slower), the Intel Core 7 160UL at 14232 (0.3% faster), and the AMD EPYC 7552 at 14115 (0.5% slower). These differences are negligible, showing the CPU is a stable, mid-range performer.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the jump from Low to Ultra is substantial. The Low preset yields an average of 84 FPS, while Ultra drops to an average of 40 FPS. This represents a 44 FPS difference, highlighting the heavy performance cost of the highest visual fidelity on this hardware.

Q: Does the game run better on Low settings at 4K than on High at 4K?

A: Yes, the data shows a significant improvement when lowering settings at 3840x2160. On High, the average frame rate is 19 FPS. Dropping to Low settings increases the average to 31 FPS. While neither is playable, the 12 FPS gain demonstrates that settings have a major impact even at very high resolutions.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data for Palworld reveals a stark division of labor between the Intel Core i5-10400F and the Intel Arc B390, with the latter being the decisive factor in overall performance. The GPU's average benchmark score of 1482 and its position at the 9th percentile among all GPUs suggest it is a very weak component for modern gaming. This is confirmed by the measured frame rates. At 1920x1080, the game's performance scales dramatically with visual settings, moving from an average of 84 FPS on Low to 40 FPS on Ultra. This 44 FPS swing is almost entirely attributable to the graphics processor's workload, as the CPU, which sits at the 68th percentile, is not being stressed to its limit at this resolution.

As resolution increases, the GPU's limitations become even more pronounced. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average frame rate on Low settings drops from 84 FPS to 56 FPS. This 28 FPS reduction is a direct consequence of the increased pixel count, which demands more raw fill rate and memory bandwidth from the GPU. The Arc B390, with its system-shared memory and "System Dependent" bandwidth, struggles to keep up. At 3840x2160, the situation becomes dire, with even the Low preset averaging only 31 FPS. The pattern is clear: the Arc B390 is overwhelmed by higher resolutions, and the CPU's performance becomes irrelevant as the GPU becomes the sole bottleneck.

The CPU's role in this pairing is primarily to provide a baseline level of performance that does not hinder the GPU further. The Intel Core i5-10400F offers a 3dmark max threads score of 4735 and a passmark multithread score of 12115, which are respectable for a desktop processor from 2020. However, in this specific game, the GPU is so far below the performance threshold that the CPU's capabilities are not the limiting factor. The data shows that the GPU's score is 9% of the average, while the CPU is at 68%, indicating a massive imbalance. For Palworld, the GPU is the component that matters most, and its performance dictates that the game is only playable at 1080p with reduced settings.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database, this specific combination of the Intel Core i5-10400F and Intel Arc B390 is ranked 3297 out of 3711 tested combos for Palworld. This rank places the system in the bottom 11% of all configurations, confirming that it is a low-performance setup for this particular game. The rank is a direct result of the Arc B390's weak graphics capabilities, as the CPU is a competent mid-range part. The database's verdict by resolution reinforces this finding, showing no playable settings at 2560x1440 or 3840x2160, and only Low and Medium presets clearing the 60 FPS bar at 1920x1080.

The combo's rank is not a reflection of the CPU, which performs adequately, but rather of the severe GPU bottleneck. When compared to other tested systems, the i5-10400F is a known quantity, but the Arc B390's performance is comparable to much older, less capable graphics solutions. The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, GeForce 800M, GT 625 OEM, and GT 710, all of which are legacy or entry-level parts. This contextualizes the combo's low rank, as it is essentially pairing a modern six-core CPU with a graphics solution that performs at a level seen in budget laptops from a decade ago. The result is a system that can run the game, but only at the most forgiving settings and resolution.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the Intel Core i5-10400F, the database shows that its performance is closely matched by several other processors. The Intel Xeon 6756E has an average score of 14163, a mere 0.2% lower than the i5-10400F's 14185. Similarly, the Intel Core 7 160UL scores 14232, which is 0.3% higher, and the AMD EPYC 7552 scores 14115, 0.5% lower. The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C is also in the same ballpark with a score of 14277, 0.6% higher. These processors would behave almost identically in Palworld, meaning the frame rates would be within a margin of error of those recorded for the i5-10400F. The choice between these CPUs would have no meaningful impact on the gaming experience with the Arc B390.

On the graphics side, the Intel Arc B390's performance is matched by a group of very old NVIDIA GPUs. The GeForce GT 520MX scores 1463, which is 1.3% higher than the Arc B390's 1482. The GeForce 800M scores 1460 (1.5% higher), the GeForce GT 625 OEM scores 1446 (2.5% lower), and the GeForce GT 710 scores 1443 (2.7% lower). For a user considering this combo, these alternatives would provide a similar level of graphics performance, meaning they would also struggle to run Palworld at high settings or resolutions. Swapping the Arc B390 for any of these would not improve the gaming experience; it would merely replace one weak graphics solution with another of similar capability. This data underscores that the Arc B390 is not a gaming GPU in the modern sense, but rather a basic display adapter.

Best Settings per Resolution

The measured frame rate data provides a clear guide for the optimal settings at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, which records an average of 68 FPS with a minimum of 58 FPS and a maximum of 79 FPS. The Low preset is also playable, with an average of 84 FPS, but Medium offers a better balance of visual quality and performance. The High preset, at 53 FPS, and Ultra, at 40 FPS, are not playable as they fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, no preset achieves an average of 60 FPS. The Low preset comes closest with an average of 56 FPS, but it is still below the playable threshold. Medium averages 45 FPS, High averages 35 FPS, and Ultra drops to 26 FPS. The verdict confirms that there are no playable settings at this resolution. Similarly, at 3840x2160, all presets are far below the 60 FPS mark. Low averages 31 FPS, Medium averages 25 FPS, High averages 19 FPS, and Ultra averages 15 FPS. The verdict lists no playable settings for 4K, meaning the game is effectively unplayable at this resolution with this hardware.

The Verdict

The question of whether this PC can run Palworld is nuanced, but the data provides a definitive answer. At 1920x1080, the system is capable of playing the game, but only with settings lowered to Medium or Low. The verdict by resolution lists "Low" and "Medium" as playable settings at this resolution, with the best being Medium at an average of 68 FPS. This is a playable experience, though it requires compromising on visual fidelity. At 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, the verdict is clear: the system cannot run the game at a playable frame rate. There are no playable settings listed for either resolution, and the average frame rates at all presets fall well below the 60 FPS threshold.

The core issue is the Intel Arc B390. Its performance, ranked at the 9th percentile among all GPUs, is simply insufficient for the demands of a modern game like Palworld at higher resolutions. While the Intel Core i5-10400F is a competent processor, it is paired with a graphics solution that is not designed for gaming. The result is a system that can only deliver a smooth experience at the lowest common denominator: 1080p with reduced graphical settings. For any user hoping to play Palworld at 1440p or 4K, or at high/ultra settings, this combination will be a frustrating experience. The recorded data shows that the only path to a 60 FPS experience is to run the game at 1080p on the Medium preset, which is the most demanding setting that clears the performance bar.