Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Palworld
Survival 2024

Palworld

87%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
148 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
70 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
97 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
47 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
56 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
22 FPS
11.1ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,522
Your CPU 51,947
Graphics Card
Required 27,862
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 22 34 44 56
1440p QHD 47 59 81 97
1080p Full HD 70 90 116 148

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 90
1920x1080 Low 148
1920x1080 Medium 116
1920x1080 Ultra 70
2560x1440 High 59
2560x1440 Low 97
2560x1440 Medium 81
2560x1440 Ultra 47
3840x2160 High 34
3840x2160 Low 56
3840x2160 Medium 44
3840x2160 Ultra 22

Performance Analysis: Palworld on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and Intel Arc B580 combination delivers a mixed picture in Palworld, with measured frame rates that range from a smooth 147.6 FPS at 1080p Low to a stutter-prone 22.4 FPS at 4K Ultra. The CPU, a 16-core Zen 3 part with a 91st percentile ranking among all processors, pairs with a GPU that sits in the 68th percentile, and the data shows the graphics card is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The CPU launched at an MSRP of $799, while the GPU launched at 249 USD. Across 3,711 tested combos, this pairing ranks 2,796th, indicating it falls behind the majority of systems in this game.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest average frame rate is 55.7 FPS on Low, which still falls short. Medium yields 44.0 FPS, High 34.1, and Ultra 22.4. The data shows that 4K is not a viable option for this combo in Palworld.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average of 80.7 FPS. Low runs at 96.5 FPS, but Medium offers a better visual balance while remaining comfortably above the threshold. High drops to 58.7 FPS, just under 60, and Ultra falls to 47.2.

At 1920x1080, all four presets clear 60 FPS. The highest playable preset is Ultra, averaging 69.9 FPS. High runs at 89.9, Medium at 116.2, and Low at 147.6. For users prioritizing visual quality, Ultra is the clear choice at 1080p.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Ryzen 9 5950X’s nearest rivals, based on average benchmark score, are the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (delta -0.2%), AMD EPYC 8124P (-0.3%), Intel Core i9-13900F (0.4%), and Intel Core i7-14700 (-0.7%). These processors have average scores within 0.7% of the 5950X, so in Palworld they would likely produce nearly identical frame rates, assuming the same GPU and settings.

The Intel Arc B580’s nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (delta -0.2%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (0.6%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (-0.7%), and NVIDIA P106-100 (-1%). The deltas are all within 1%, meaning these GPUs would deliver very similar performance in this game. The RTX 3080, despite being a higher-tier card in other contexts, shows a benchmark score nearly identical to the B580, so users with that GPU could expect comparable Palworld frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table lists all measured average frame rates from the data set. Minimum and maximum values were not recorded, so only averages are available.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |

|------------|----------|---------|

| 3840x2160 | High | 34.1 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 55.7 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 44.0 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 22.4 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 58.7 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 96.5 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 80.7 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 47.2 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 89.9 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 147.6 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 116.2 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 69.9 |

The pattern is clear: frame rates drop sharply as resolution increases, and the gap between Low and Ultra widens at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 77.7 FPS, while at 4K it narrows to 33.3 FPS, but the absolute values are far lower.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Palworld? The answer depends on the target resolution. At 3840x2160, no settings achieve 60 FPS, so the game is not playable at 4K. At 2560x1440, Low and Medium are playable, with Medium being the best option at 80.7 FPS. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear 60 FPS, and Ultra is the best playable setting at 69.9 FPS.

The data shows that 1080p is the sweet spot for this combo, offering a full range of presets above the playable threshold. For 1440p, users must compromise on settings, but Medium provides a solid experience. 4K is out of reach, as even the lowest preset falls short of 60 FPS.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 2560x1440?

A: Medium, with an average of 80.7 FPS. Low also exceeds 60 FPS at 96.5, but High and Ultra fall below the threshold.

Q: Is 4K playable with this combo?

A: No. All four presets at 3840x2160 average below 60 FPS, with the best being Low at 55.7 FPS.

Q: What is the best settings for 1920x1080?

A: Ultra, which averages 69.9 FPS. All presets at 1080p are playable, but Ultra offers the highest visual quality while staying above 60.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems?

A: It ranks 2,796 out of 3,711 combos, meaning it is outperformed by 2,795 other configurations.

Q: What are the CPU and GPU percentile rankings?

A: The Ryzen 9 5950X is in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Arc B580 is in the 68th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Which component is more likely to limit performance?

A: The GPU, given its lower percentile and the fact that frame rates scale strongly with resolution and settings, while the CPU’s high benchmark scores suggest ample headroom.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 2,796 out of 3,711 places it in the lower half of tested systems. Only 915 combos rank below it, meaning the majority of configurations deliver better Palworld performance. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking is strong, but the GPU’s 68th percentile drags the overall result down. This disparity suggests that the Arc B580 is the limiting factor, and pairing the 5950X with a higher-tier GPU would likely move the combo significantly up the rankings.

The data also shows that the CPU’s nearest rivals have nearly identical average benchmark scores, so swapping the 5950X for a similar processor would not change the outcome. The GPU’s rivals, however, include the RTX 3080, which has a benchmark score within 0.7% of the B580, so users with that card would see similar frame rates. The rank reflects the GPU’s modest standing relative to other graphics cards in the database.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured frame rates reveal a clear division of labor. At 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to push frame rates as high as 147.6 FPS on Low, but the GPU becomes the bottleneck as settings increase, dropping to 69.9 FPS on Ultra. At 1440p, the same pattern holds: Low runs at 96.5 FPS, but Ultra falls to 47.2. At 4K, even Low only reaches 55.7 FPS, and Ultra drops to 22.4.

The scaling between resolutions is steep. From 1080p Low to 4K Low, the average FPS falls from 147.6 to 55.7, a reduction of 91.9 FPS. From 1080p Ultra to 4K Ultra, the drop is from 69.9 to 22.4, a 47.5 FPS difference. This indicates that the GPU is heavily stressed by pixel count, while the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads are not the limiting factor. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,017 and PassMark multithread score of 45,424 are far above what Palworld likely requires, though the game’s exact CPU demands are not specified in the data.

The GPU’s lower percentile (68) compared to the CPU’s (91) reinforces this conclusion. At every resolution, the frame rate is more sensitive to graphics settings than to CPU performance, as evidenced by the wide gaps between Low and Ultra. The data suggests that users seeking higher frame rates should focus on GPU upgrades, while the CPU is more than adequate for this title.