Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Palworld
Survival 2024

Palworld

87%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
149 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
68 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
97 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
48 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
52 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
23 FPS
11.1ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,522
Your CPU 40,081
Graphics Card
Required 27,862
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 23 31 43 52
1440p QHD 48 60 81 97
1080p Full HD 68 90 117 149

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 90
1920x1080 Low 149
1920x1080 Medium 117
1920x1080 Ultra 68
2560x1440 High 60
2560x1440 Low 97
2560x1440 Medium 81
2560x1440 Ultra 48
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Low 52
3840x2160 Medium 43
3840x2160 Ultra 23

Performance Analysis: Palworld on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and Intel Arc B580 combination ranks 2833rd out of 3711 tested combos for Palworld, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the benchmark database. This percentile position is heavily influenced by the GPU's overall standing, as the Arc B580 sits at the 68th percentile among all GPUs, while the Ryzen 7 7700 is a much stronger performer at the 87th percentile among all CPUs. The pairing produces a system where the graphics card is the limiting factor in most scenarios, a conclusion supported by the measured frame rates across resolutions and settings. The combo's rank indicates that while this system is far from the top tier for this survival title, it is not at the bottom either; it sits in a zone where playability depends entirely on the resolution and quality preset chosen.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 2833 out of 3711 tested configurations places it near the 76th percentile of tested systems, meaning roughly a quarter of tested combos perform worse in Palworld. This is a modest standing for a CPU that individually ranks in the top 13% of all processors, underscoring how the GPU bottleneck drags the overall result down. The Arc B580's 68th percentile ranking among all GPUs is the primary constraint; the CPU's 87th percentile standing cannot compensate for the graphics card's mid-range position. In practical terms, this rank suggests the combo will handle the game at 1080p with room to spare but will struggle to maintain smooth performance at higher resolutions. The data indicates that the Ryzen 7 7700 has substantial headroom left on the table when paired with the Arc B580, as the CPU's average benchmark score of 40081 is nearly double the GPU's average of 23021, a disparity that shows up clearly in the frame rate scaling between resolutions.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Ryzen 7 7700 and the Arc B580 shifts noticeably as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the CPU's strength becomes evident: the frame rates jump from 67.5 FPS at Ultra settings to 148.5 FPS at Low settings, a 120% increase that demonstrates the system is not CPU-limited even at the lowest quality preset. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a drop of 81 FPS, indicating that the GPU is doing progressively more work as settings rise, but the CPU can feed it adequately throughout. At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to show strain: Low settings produce 97.1 FPS, but Ultra drops to 48.2 FPS, a 50% reduction that points to the Arc B580's memory bandwidth and shading capabilities becoming the limiting factor. The 1440p Medium setting at 80.6 FPS versus 1080p Medium at 117.2 FPS shows a 31% penalty from the resolution increase, which is a larger drop than the 20% penalty seen from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings, confirming that the GPU's workload scales more steeply with settings than with resolution. At 3840x2160, the CPU's role becomes almost irrelevant: even Low settings only reach 52.1 FPS, and Ultra drops to 23.1 FPS, a performance collapse that clearly identifies the Arc B580 as the sole bottleneck at 4K. The 8-core, 16-thread Ryzen 7 7700 with its 5.30 GHz boost clock and 32 MB of L3 cache provides more than enough processing power for Palworld's survival mechanics, but the Arc B580's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth cannot sustain high frame rates when pixel count rises.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers playable performance across all four tested presets. Low settings average 148.5 FPS, Medium averages 117.2 FPS, High averages 89.8 FPS, and Ultra averages 67.5 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 81 FPS, showing a steep but manageable trade-off between visual quality and speed. The Ultra preset at 67.5 FPS clears the 60 FPS playability threshold by a comfortable 7.5 FPS margin, making it the best-looking playable option at this resolution. At 2560x1440, the picture becomes more selective. Low settings average 97.1 FPS, Medium averages 80.6 FPS, High averages 59.6 FPS, and Ultra averages 48.2 FPS. The High preset falls just short of the 60 FPS threshold by 0.4 FPS, a marginal miss that makes Medium the highest playable setting at 1440p. The gap between Medium and High at 1440p is 21 FPS, a substantial penalty for one step up in quality. At 3840x2160, none of the presets reach playable status. Low averages 52.1 FPS, Medium averages 43.4 FPS, High averages 31.1 FPS, and Ultra averages 23.1 FPS. The 4K results show a consistent degradation pattern: each preset step up costs roughly 8-10 FPS, but even the lowest setting cannot break the 60 FPS barrier. The absence of min and max FPS data in the measurements means these averages represent the full picture, but the consistency of the scaling suggests stable performance rather than erratic spikes.

The Verdict

This PC can run Palworld, but the playable envelope is limited to specific resolution and settings combinations. At 1920x1080, all four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 67.5 FPS as the best visual option. At 2560x1440, only Low and Medium are playable, with Medium at 80.6 FPS being the highest quality preset that maintains smooth gameplay. The High preset at 1440p averages 59.6 FPS, missing the 60 FPS mark by 0.4 FPS, which is a borderline result that could vary with in-game scenes. At 3840x2160, no preset achieves playable status; the best result is Low at 52.1 FPS, which falls 7.9 FPS short of the threshold. The verdict is clear: this combo is a 1080p Ultra-capable system and a 1440p Medium-capable system, but it is not a 4K solution for Palworld. The data shows the Arc B580's 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 80 ROPs are sufficient for 1080p and modest 1440p workloads, but the 192-bit memory bus and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for 4K rendering in this title.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for each component provides context for what other hardware would behave similarly. The Ryzen 7 7700's closest competitors in benchmark scores are the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 with an average score of 40048 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core 5 221E with 40144 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 270 with 40246 (0.4% higher), and the Intel Core i9-13905H with 40313 (0.6% higher). These deltas are all within one percent, meaning any of these CPUs paired with the same GPU would produce nearly identical frame rates in Palworld. The GPU side shows more variance: the Arc B580's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP with an average score of 23061 (0.2% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 with 22895 (0.6% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 with 23172 (0.7% higher), and the NVIDIA P106-100 with 23249 (1.0% higher). The RTX 3080 being a near-match is notable, as it suggests the Arc B580 delivers comparable Palworld performance to a card from a higher tier, likely due to the game's engine characteristics. For a system builder, swapping the Ryzen 7 7700 for any of the four rival CPUs would change nothing measurable in this game, while swapping the Arc B580 for an RTX 3080 would produce nearly identical results within 0.7%. The RX 580 2048SP being a close match reinforces that the Arc B580's performance profile in Palworld aligns with mid-range GPUs from previous generations.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Palworld at 4K resolution?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the best average FPS is 52.1 at Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS playability threshold. Ultra settings average only 23.1 FPS.

Q: What is the highest quality preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: Medium settings at 2560x1440 average 80.6 FPS, making it the highest playable preset. High settings average 59.6 FPS, just missing the threshold.

Q: How much faster is the CPU compared to the GPU in this combo?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 has an average benchmark score of 40081, while the Intel Arc B580 has an average score of 23021, making the CPU roughly 74% faster in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: Does the Arc B580's 12 GB of VRAM help at high resolutions?

A: Despite having 12 GB of GDDR6 memory with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, the GPU still cannot reach 60 FPS at 4K on any preset, indicating that memory capacity is not the limiting factor; raw compute and memory bandwidth are insufficient.

Q: Which component is the bottleneck at 1080p Ultra?

A: The GPU is the bottleneck. At 1920x1080 Ultra, the system averages 67.5 FPS, and the frame rate scaling from Low (148.5 FPS) to Ultra shows the GPU struggling with higher settings while the CPU remains capable.

Q: What is the closest rival GPU to the Arc B580 in this game?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is the nearest rival with an average benchmark score of 23172, which is 0.7% higher than the Arc B580's 23021, indicating nearly identical performance in Palworld.