Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Palworld
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 13 | 17 | 23 | 28 |
| 1440p QHD | 24 | 31 | 41 | 50 |
| 1080p Full HD | 36 | 47 | 62 | 76 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Palworld on Your System
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and Intel Arc B370 is a pairing that lands in a very specific performance tier. The database shows this combination is measured directly in Palworld, and the results are clear: this is a 1080p-oriented setup with strict limits at higher resolutions. The CPU is a capable modern desktop processor, while the GPU sits at the low end of the recorded spectrum, and that imbalance defines every frame rate in this title.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, no preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold. The recorded data shows the highest average frame rate at this resolution is 28 FPS on Low settings, which falls far short of playable. Medium averages 23 FPS, High averages 17 FPS, and Ultra averages 13 FPS. There is no recommended setting here; the database lists no playable settings for 4K.
At 2560x1440, the situation improves slightly but remains below the target. Low settings produce an average of 50 FPS, which is the best result at this resolution, but it still does not clear the 60 FPS bar. Medium averages 41 FPS, High averages 31 FPS, and Ultra averages 24 FPS. Again, the verdict records no playable settings for 1440p.
At 1920x1080, the picture changes. Low settings run at 76 FPS average, and Medium runs at 62 FPS average. Both clear the 60 FPS threshold. The best settings that stay at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with its 62 FPS average. High falls to 47 FPS, and Ultra drops to 36 FPS, so neither is playable by the database standard. The single best playable configuration is 1080p Medium at 62 FPS.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU’s nearest rivals in the database show how close the Ryzen 5 7500F sits to a cluster of other processors. The Intel Core i7-11850H has an average benchmark score of 24935, a delta of 0.1% from the Ryzen’s 24964. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25005, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i7-13620H scores 24911, 0.2% lower. The Intel Core 5 210H scores 24872, 0.4% lower. In practical terms, any of these CPUs would behave nearly identically in Palworld when paired with the same GPU, since the differences are within a fraction of a percent.
The GPU tells a different story. The Intel Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1184 and sits at the 5th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are all legacy or low-end parts. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, a 0.2% difference. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, 0.7% higher. The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, 1.4% lower. These deltas are small, meaning Palworld performance with the Arc B370 should closely track what these older cards would deliver, assuming driver behavior is consistent.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The recorded data covers three resolutions and four settings each. At 3840x2160, Low averages 28 FPS with no min or max recorded. Medium averages 23 FPS with a min of 19 and a max of 26. High averages 17 FPS. Ultra averages 13 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 15 FPS, and even the best 4K result is less than half of the 60 FPS target.
At 2560x1440, Low averages 50 FPS. Medium averages 41 FPS with a min of 35 and a max of 47. High averages 31 FPS. Ultra averages 24 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 26 FPS. The Medium preset’s min of 35 FPS shows noticeable dips, which reinforces that this resolution is not viable for smooth gameplay.
At 1920x1080, Low averages 76 FPS. Medium averages 62 FPS with a min of 52 and a max of 71. High averages 47 FPS. Ultra averages 36 FPS. The Medium preset’s minimum of 52 FPS dips below the 60 FPS average, so there are moments of stutter even in the recommended configuration, but the average holds. Low is the only preset with a comfortable margin above the threshold, averaging 76 FPS.
The pattern across all resolutions is consistent: each step from Low to Ultra costs a significant chunk of performance. At 1080p, dropping from Medium to Low gains 14 FPS. Dropping from High to Medium gains 15 FPS. At 1440p, the same step from High to Medium gains 10 FPS. The scaling is steep because the GPU is the limiting factor.
The Verdict
Can this PC run Palworld? The database says yes, but only at 1920x1080 with Low or Medium settings. The verdict by resolution lists playable settings only for 1080p: Low and Medium. The best settings at this resolution is Medium, with an average of 62 FPS. At 2560x1440, no settings are playable; the best average is 50 FPS on Low, which is 10 FPS short of the threshold. At 3840x2160, no settings are playable; the best average is 28 FPS on Low.
So the answer is conditional. At 1080p, the system clears the 60 FPS bar on Medium, though the 52 FPS minimum means frame times are not perfectly smooth. At 1440p and 4K, the system cannot reach 60 FPS on any preset. Users with a 1440p or 4K display would need to lower resolution or accept sub-60 frame rates, and the data shows even Low settings at those resolutions do not meet the playable standard.
CPU and GPU Roles
The division of labor in Palworld is lopsided for this combo. The Ryzen 5 7500F is a strong desktop CPU with a 77th percentile ranking among all processors, a multi-threaded PassMark score of 26825, and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22799. The Intel Arc B370, by contrast, ranks at the 5th percentile among GPUs and produces only 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The GPU is overwhelmingly the bottleneck.
The resolution scaling makes this obvious. At 1080p Low, the system averages 76 FPS. At 1440p Low, it averages 50 FPS, a drop of 26 FPS. At 4K Low, it averages 28 FPS, another drop of 22 FPS. This steep decline with resolution is typical of GPU-limited workloads. If the CPU were the constraint, the frame rate would stay relatively flat as resolution increases, but the data shows a rapid falloff.
The preset scaling also points to GPU limitation. At 1080p, going from Low to Medium costs 14 FPS, from Medium to High costs 15 FPS, and from High to Ultra costs 11 FPS. At 1440p, the same steps cost 9, 10, and 7 FPS respectively. The consistent, large penalties for higher settings indicate that the graphics pipeline is saturated. The CPU’s role is to feed the GPU, and with a processor this strong, it is not the limiting factor at any resolution in this title.
At 4K, the GPU is so overwhelmed that even Low settings produce only 28 FPS. The CPU has plenty of headroom; its single-thread performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2374 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 974, is more than sufficient for Palworld’s demands. The data shows no scenario where the CPU becomes the primary constraint. Every frame rate movement tracks the GPU’s workload.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Ryzen 5 7500F and the Intel Arc B370 ranks 3423 out of 3711 tested combos in Palworld. That places it in the bottom 8% of the database’s tested configurations. The percentile ranking of the GPU, 5th among all GPUs, drags the overall result down far more than the CPU’s 77th percentile lifts it up.
This rank is consistent with the measured frame rates. A combo in the bottom 8% of all tested systems would be expected to struggle at higher resolutions, and the data confirms that. Only 288 combos in the database rank lower than this pairing. The practical takeaway is that this system sits just above the very bottom tier of capable gaming PCs, and its performance in Palworld reflects that position.
The CPU’s benchmark score of 24964 places it in a dense cluster of processors, but that does not rescue the overall rank. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 1184 is the weak link. In a game like Palworld, which stresses the renderer heavily, the GPU dictates the outcome, and the Arc B370’s low standing among all GPUs is the dominant factor in the 3423rd place finish.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Palworld at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?
A: No. The highest average frame rate at 3840x2160 is 28 FPS on Low settings. Medium averages 23 FPS, High averages 17 FPS, and Ultra averages 13 FPS. No preset reaches 60 FPS.
Q: What is the best playable settings preset for this combo?
A: The database lists 1920x1080 with Medium settings as the best playable configuration, averaging 62 FPS. Low settings also clear the threshold with an average of 76 FPS.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Arc B370 scores 1184 in the database. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, 0.2% higher. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, 0.7% higher. The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, 1.4% lower. All are within 1.4% of the Arc B370.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in Palworld?
A: The GPU. The Ryzen 5 7500F ranks at the 77th percentile among CPUs, while the Arc B370 ranks at the 5th percentile among GPUs. Frame rates drop sharply with resolution, from 76 FPS at 1080p Low to 50 FPS at 1440p Low to 28 FPS at 4K Low, which is a classic GPU-limited pattern.
Q: What frame rate does the system get at 1440p on Low settings?
A: The average is 50 FPS. This is below the 60 FPS threshold, and the database records no playable settings at 2560x1440.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems in Palworld?
A: It ranks 3423 out of 3711 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 8% of the database. The GPU’s low standing is the primary reason for this rank.