Minimum

FAQ

Q: What is the best playable preset for this combo at 1920x1080?

A: The database records 1920x1080 Medium as the best playable setting, with an average of 70 FPS. Low also clears the 60 FPS threshold at 91 FPS average, but Medium is the highest preset that remains playable.

Q: Can this PC run the game at 2560x1440?

A: No. At 2560x1440, every recorded preset falls below 60 FPS. Low averages 59 FPS, Medium averages 45 FPS, High averages 38 FPS, and Ultra averages 29 FPS. None of these meet the playable threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in overall benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 has an average benchmark score of 64640, which places it within 1% of all four nearest rivals. It trails the AMD EPYC 9124 by 0.7% and the AMD EPYC 4464P by 0.3%, while leading the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F by 0.3% and the AMD EPYC 7343 by 0.7%.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile relative to all GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 580 sits at the 53rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 12928. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, scores 12940, a difference of only 0.1%.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1920x1080?

A: Low averages 91 FPS, while Ultra averages 45 FPS. That is a 46 FPS drop between the lowest and highest presets. Medium sits at 70 FPS and High at 58 FPS, showing a steady decline as settings increase.

Q: Which component, CPU or GPU, is more limiting at 3840x2160?

A: The data indicates the GPU becomes the dominant constraint at 4K. The CPU is a high-end 20-core part with a 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU is a 53rd percentile part. At 3840x2160, even Low settings only reach 32 FPS, which points to the GPU saturating before the CPU becomes a factor.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and the AMD Radeon RX 580 ranks 3383 out of 3712 tested combos in Minimum. This places it in the lower 9% of all tested configurations, meaning roughly 9 out of every 10 combos in the database perform better in this game. The rank reflects the GPU's modest standing: the RX 580 is at the 53rd percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU is at the 93rd percentile. The pairing is heavily unbalanced, with a very strong processor held back by a mid-range graphics card.

The ranking makes sense when looking at the measured frame rates. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers playable performance at Low and Medium, but drops below 60 FPS at High and Ultra. At 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS. The overall rank of 3383 indicates that most other hardware combinations in the database deliver higher average frame rates across resolutions, which is consistent with a GPU that was released in 2017 and is now classified as end-of-life.

For context, the CPU alone ranks in the 93rd percentile of all processors, and its average benchmark score of 64640 is nearly identical to server-class EPYC parts. The GPU, however, has an average benchmark score of 12928, which is only about one-fifth of the CPU's score. This gap explains why the combo rank is so low relative to the CPU's individual standing: the GPU cannot translate the processor's computational headroom into playable frame rates in demanding scenarios.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data shows a clear pattern: the GPU is the limiting factor at every resolution in Minimum, and the CPU's role diminishes as resolution increases. At 1920x1080 Low, the combo reaches 91 FPS. At 2560x1440 Low, it drops to 59 FPS. At 3840x2160 Low, it falls to 32 FPS. This scaling across resolutions is typical of GPU-bound workloads, where the graphics card's fill rate and memory bandwidth determine performance.

The CPU's influence is visible at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080, the frame rates vary significantly across presets, from 91 FPS at Low to 45 FPS at Ultra. This variation is driven by the GPU's ability to handle increased shading and texture work. The CPU, with its 20 cores and 5.30 GHz boost clock, is not the bottleneck at these settings. Even at 1080p Low, where CPU overhead is highest, the combo still exceeds 90 FPS, suggesting the processor has ample headroom.

At 2560x1440, the same trend continues. Low averages 59 FPS, Medium 45 FPS, High 38 FPS, and Ultra 29 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 30 FPS, nearly identical to the 46 FPS gap at 1080p but with lower absolute values. At 3840x2160, the frame rates compress further: Low 32 FPS, Medium 24 FPS, High 20 FPS, and Ultra 15 FPS. The shrinking differences between presets at higher resolutions indicate that the GPU is increasingly overwhelmed, and the CPU's contribution becomes negligible.

The data suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield significant gains across all resolutions, while upgrading the CPU would produce little to no improvement in this specific title. The RX 580's 256-bit memory bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for the pixel throughput demanded at 4K, and the GPU's 6.175 TFLOPS FP32 performance caps its ability to handle high-detail geometry and effects.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals in the database, several hardware combinations would behave similarly to this CPU-GPU pairing. On the CPU side, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265's nearest rivals are all within 1% of its average benchmark score. The AMD EPYC 4464P scores 64823 (0.3% lower), the AMD EPYC 9124 scores 65104 (0.7% higher), the AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64202 (0.7% lower), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F scores 64438 (0.3% lower). Any of these processors paired with the same RX 580 would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minimum, since the CPU is not the limiting factor.

On the GPU side, the RX 580's nearest rivals are similarly close. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile scores 12940 (0.1% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12986 (0.4% higher), the AMD Radeon 740M scores 12870 (0.5% lower), and the AMD FirePro W5100 scores 12847 (0.6% lower). Substituting any of these GPUs for the RX 580 would result in frame rates within a fraction of a percent of what the data shows, assuming the CPU remains the same.

In practical terms, a system with the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and any of these GPUs would deliver the same 1080p Medium 70 FPS result, the same 1440p sub-60 FPS results, and the same 4K performance around 15 to 32 FPS depending on preset. The closest overall alternative would be the GTX 1660 SUPER, which scores marginally higher and would push 1080p High closer to the 60 FPS threshold, but the difference is within measurement noise.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no preset is playable. The highest average FPS recorded is 32 at Low, followed by 24 at Medium, 20 at High, and 15 at Ultra. All fall well short of the 60 FPS playable threshold, so the database reports no recommended settings for this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the same situation applies. Low averages 59 FPS, which is just 1 FPS below the playable threshold. Medium averages 45 FPS, High 38 FPS, and Ultra 29 FPS. None of these meet the 60 FPS requirement, so no preset is recommended.

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average of 70 FPS. The recorded minimum for Medium is 59 FPS, which means the frame rate occasionally dips just below the threshold, but the average remains comfortably playable. Low averages 91 FPS and is also playable, but Medium offers better visual quality while maintaining an acceptable average. High averages 58 FPS, which is 2 FPS below the threshold, and Ultra averages 45 FPS, so neither is recommended.

The verdict for 1080p is clear: use Medium settings. The data shows a 12 FPS drop from Low to Medium (91 to 70), but a further 12 FPS drop from Medium to High (70 to 58). Medium represents the best balance between visual fidelity and performance for this combo at 1920x1080.

The Verdict

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with AMD Radeon RX 580 can run Minimum, but only at 1920x1080 and only on Low or Medium presets. At 1080p Medium, the combo delivers 70 FPS average, with a recorded minimum of 59 FPS. At 1080p Low, it delivers 91 FPS. High and Ultra at 1080p fall below the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 58 FPS and 45 FPS respectively.

At 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, this system cannot maintain playable frame rates on any preset. The closest result is 1440p Low at 59 FPS, which is 1 FPS short of the playable threshold. Every other 1440p and 4K preset averages between 15 and 45 FPS, all well below the 60 FPS mark.

The verdict by resolution is straightforward: the database lists 1920x1080 as the only resolution with playable settings, and Medium as the best setting at that resolution, with 70 FPS average. For gamers targeting 60 FPS, the practical ceiling is 1080p Medium. The CPU is far more capable than the GPU, and the system's overall performance is limited entirely by the Radeon RX 580, which sits at the 53rd GPU percentile and is classified as end-of-life. Users seeking higher resolutions or higher presets would need a more powerful graphics card, as the processor has substantial headroom that the current GPU cannot utilize.