Minimum

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H paired with the AMD Radeon 760M is a mobile combo built around an integrated GPU. Testing against Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter, shows that this configuration struggles to reach the 60 FPS playable threshold at any resolution or preset. The data paints a clear picture: this is a hardware pairing for light workloads and older games at modest expectations, not for high-refresh competitive play.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the results are uniformly poor. The High preset delivers an average of 13 FPS, while Low improves to only 20 FPS. Medium sits between them at 15 FPS average, with a minimum of 13 FPS and a maximum of 18 FPS. Ultra is the worst of the group, dropping to 10 FPS average. None of these figures come close to the 60 FPS threshold, and even the best case at Low is more than three times below it. The integrated GPU simply lacks the fill rate for 4K workloads, as indicated by its 41.58 GPixel/s pixel rate and 5.323 TFLOPS FP32 performance.

Dropping to 2560x1440 helps, but not enough. High averages 24 FPS, Medium averages 29 FPS with a 24–33 FPS range, and Low reaches 37 FPS. Ultra manages only 18 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 8 FPS, which suggests the Radeon 760M is memory-bandwidth limited at this resolution. The GPU uses System Shared memory, and bandwidth is listed as System Dependent, so the shared pool and bus width become bottlenecks as resolution increases. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth of the CPU is the theoretical ceiling, but real-world shared-memory performance will be lower.

At 1920x1080, the story improves marginally. Low is the standout at 58 FPS average, just 2 FPS shy of playable. Medium averages 44 FPS with a 38–51 FPS range, High drops to 37 FPS, and Ultra falls to 28 FPS. The delta between Low and Medium is 14 FPS, a larger step than the 8 FPS jump seen at 1440p. This indicates that the GPU has enough raw compute at 1080p but is heavily constrained by shader and texture work as settings rise. With 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, the architecture is skewed toward efficiency over brute force, and higher presets expose that tradeoff.

Best Settings per Resolution

No resolution in the data set achieves 60 FPS at any preset. The verdict fields for 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080 all list empty playable settings and null best settings. That means the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS does not exist for this combo. The closest any setting comes is 1920x1080 Low at 58 FPS average, which is still below the playable threshold.

For practical guidance, 1080p Low is the only option worth considering if you are near the threshold, but it is not officially playable. At 1440p, even Low at 37 FPS is a non-starter for smooth gameplay. At 4K, every preset is in single digits or low twenties, which is effectively a slideshow. The data suggests that if you must run this game on this hardware, 1080p Low is the ceiling, and even that fails the 60 FPS bar by 2 FPS.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 60 FPS?*

A: No. The measured data shows no preset at any resolution reaches 60 FPS. The best result is 58 FPS at 1920x1080 Low, which is below the playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded?

A: The highest average across all tested configurations is 58 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This is the only result within 2 FPS of the playable threshold.

Q: How does the Radeon 760M compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Radeon 760M has an average benchmark score of 6019, placing it 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, and 0.5% behind the NVIDIA Quadro P2000. It sits in the 35th percentile of all GPUs, indicating lower-tier performance.

Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck for this game?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32697. It is roughly equivalent to the Intel Core i5-14600T (0% delta) and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (0.1% delta). Given the GPU’s 35th percentile ranking, the integrated graphics are the limiting factor.

Q: What does the combo rank tell us about overall performance?

A: This pairing ranks 3701 out of 3712 tested combos for Minimum, placing it in the bottom 0.3% of all configurations. This is consistent with the FPS data showing no playable settings.

Q: Are the FPS numbers measured or estimated?

A: The data is measured, not simulated. The `dataIsMeasured` field is true, and the figures come from actual benchmarking of this specific CPU-GPU combination.

The Verdict

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and AMD Radeon 760M cannot run Minimum at a playable 60 FPS at any resolution. The verdictByResolution data confirms this: 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080 all return empty playable settings lists. The best case scenario is 1920x1080 Low at 58 FPS, which is technically below the threshold. Every other preset at 1080p falls further behind, and higher resolutions are dramatically worse.

For context, the GPU’s 35th percentile ranking and the combo’s 3701st place out of 3712 configurations highlight how far this hardware is from gaming capable. The CPU is not the issue — it ranks in the 83rd percentile and matches desktop-class parts like the Core i5-14600T. The Radeon 760M, with its 512 shading units and 5.323 TFLOPS, is simply not designed for demanding 3D workloads. If you are targeting 60 FPS in Minimum, this combo is not the answer. You would need a discrete GPU or a more powerful integrated solution.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals are all within 0.4% of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H’s average benchmark score of 32697. The Intel Core i5-14600T matches it at 32707 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662 (0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32750 (-0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 (-0.4% delta). Any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Minimum, meaning the GPU remains the decisive factor.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon 760M averages 6019 in benchmarks. The AMD Radeon RX 6400 scores 6001 (0.3% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M scores 6000 (0.3% delta), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server scores 5996 (0.4% delta), and the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 scores 6049 (-0.5% delta). These are the closest performance neighbors, so swapping to any of them would yield similar FPS in Minimum. Notably, the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is a professional workstation card, not a gaming part, which underscores how low the Radeon 760M sits in the gaming hierarchy.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank for Minimum is 3701 out of 3712 tested combinations. That places this hardware in the bottom 11 spots of the entire database for this game. With only 0.3% of all tested combos performing worse, this is effectively a bottom-tier configuration. The CPU’s strong 83rd percentile standing does nothing to rescue the pairing because the integrated GPU caps performance at roughly 58 FPS in the best case. Every other tested combo ranked higher, including those with older discrete GPUs like the GTX 770M, which matches the Radeon 760M in raw benchmark score but may handle this specific title differently due to driver maturity and memory allocation. In short, if you are looking up this combo for Minimum, the data says look elsewhere.