Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 26 | 35 | 41 | 54 |
| 1440p QHD | 49 | 64 | 77 | 100 |
| 1080p Full HD | 76 | 100 | 119 | 155 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
Best Settings per Resolution
The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 produces a clear picture of what this combo can handle in Minimum. The database records measured frame rates across three resolutions and four quality presets. The playable threshold is set at 60 FPS, and the results show a sharp divide between 4K and lower resolutions.
At 3840x2160, no preset achieves the 60 FPS threshold. The recorded data shows the best average at Low settings is 54 FPS, which falls short of playability. Medium averages 41 FPS, High averages 35 FPS, and Ultra drops to 26 FPS. The verdict field confirms no playable settings exist at this resolution, so the recommendation is to avoid 4K with this hardware for a smooth experience.
At 2560x1440, the situation improves considerably. The database lists High, Low, and Medium as playable presets. The best settings that keep the game at or above 60 FPS is High, which delivers an average of 64 FPS. Low runs at 100 FPS and Medium at 77 FPS, both comfortably above the threshold. Ultra falls to 49 FPS and is not listed as playable.
At 1920x1080, all four presets are playable. The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which produces an average of 76 FPS. High runs at 100 FPS, Medium at 119 FPS, and Low at 155 FPS. This resolution is where the combo shows its full strength, allowing maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.
For users targeting the best visual experience, the data indicates that 1080p Ultra is the sweet spot. At 1440p, High is the ceiling for consistent 60 FPS gameplay. At 4K, the hardware cannot maintain playable frame rates at any setting, so lowering resolution is mandatory.
CPU and GPU Roles
The interaction between the Intel Core i7-14700KF and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 becomes clear when examining how frame rates scale with resolution and preset changes. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread part with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, a Turing-based RTX 2060 with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, sits in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. This gap in relative strength shapes the bottleneck behavior.
At 1920x1080, the GPU is the dominant constraint. Going from Low to Ultra reduces the average from 155 FPS to 76 FPS, a drop of about half. The CPU has ample headroom at this resolution, as evidenced by the high frame rates even at Low settings. The RTX 2060's 1920 shading units and 6.451 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are what limit the upper bound here.
At 2560x1440, the GPU's load increases further. The average at Low is 100 FPS, dropping to 64 FPS at High and 49 FPS at Ultra. The scaling between presets shows the GPU struggling more as pixel count rises. The CPU still has reserve capacity, but the GPU's memory bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s and 192-bit bus become more relevant factors.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is overwhelmingly the limiting factor. Even Low settings only produce 54 FPS, and the gap between presets narrows. The RTX 2060's 6 GB VRAM and raw compute are insufficient for 4K in this title, regardless of how much CPU power is available. The i7-14700KF's strong single-thread performance, shown by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6235, cannot compensate for the GPU's ceiling at this resolution.
The data indicates that the CPU's role is largely passive across all tested resolutions. Its high benchmark scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 44167, suggest it would handle less demanding CPU-bound titles easily, but in Minimum, the GPU dictates the outcome. The measured FPS values align with a GPU-bound scenario: as resolution increases, frame rates drop proportionally more than preset changes would suggest.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations, this pairing holds a specific position. The combo rank for Minimum is 2929 out of 3712 tested combos, placing it in the lower third of all configurations. This rank reflects the overall balance of CPU and GPU performance in this specific game.
The rank is unsurprising given the GPU's position. The RTX 2060's average benchmark score is 15290, which puts it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. The i7-14700KF, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 70163, sitting in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. This mismatch means the combo's rank is dragged down by the GPU, even though the CPU is a top-tier part.
In practical terms, the combo's rank suggests that many other pairings deliver better Minimum performance. The GPU's end-of-life production status and its position relative to newer parts contribute to this ranking. Users considering this combo should expect it to handle older or less demanding titles well, but for Minimum specifically, the GPU holds the system back from higher rankings.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For users looking at nearby hardware, the database provides direct comparisons for both the CPU and GPU. These alternatives would behave similarly in Minimum, based on their benchmark scores.
On the CPU side, the i7-14700KF's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, which scores 69996 on average, a delta of 0.2% from the i7's 70163 average. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875, a 0.4% delta. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515, a 0.9% delta. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K scores 70879, a -1% delta, meaning it is slightly faster. In Minimum, any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates when paired with the same GPU, since the GPU is the bottleneck.
On the GPU side, the RTX 2060's nearest rivals are tightly clustered. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 scores 15283, a 0% delta from the RTX 2060's 15290. The AMD Radeon 680M scores 15270, a 0.1% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 15199, a 0.6% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 scores 15171, a 0.8% delta. These GPUs would deliver very similar frame rates in Minimum, meaning users with any of these parts would see comparable performance.
The close deltas, all within 1%, indicate that swapping the CPU or GPU for one of these alternatives would not meaningfully change the gaming experience in Minimum. The bottleneck remains the GPU, and all these GPUs sit in the same performance tier.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The database provides exact measured frame rates for each resolution and preset combination. The following is the complete recorded breakdown.
At 3840x2160, the results are limited. High settings produce an average of 35 FPS with no min or max recorded. Low settings average 54 FPS. Medium settings average 41 FPS, with a min of 35 and max of 47. Ultra settings average 26 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates climb. High settings average 64 FPS. Low settings average 100 FPS. Medium settings average 77 FPS, with a min of 65 and max of 88. Ultra settings average 49 FPS.
At 1920x1080, the combo performs best. High settings average 100 FPS. Low settings average 155 FPS. Medium settings average 119 FPS, with a min of 101 and max of 137. Ultra settings average 76 FPS.
The pattern across resolutions shows diminishing returns as pixel count increases. At 1080p, the gap between Low and Ultra is 79 FPS. At 1440p, that gap narrows to 51 FPS. At 4K, the gap is only 28 FPS. This compression at higher resolutions confirms the GPU's limitations, as it cannot scale its output to match increasing pixel workloads.
The min and max values recorded for Medium settings provide additional context. At 1080p Medium, the frame rate ranges from 101 to 137, a spread of 36 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the range is 65 to 88, a spread of 23 FPS. At 4K Medium, the range is 35 to 47, a spread of 12 FPS. This tightening range at higher resolutions indicates the GPU operating closer to its consistent limit.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Minimum at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?
A: No. The database shows no playable settings at 3840x2160. The best average is 54 FPS at Low settings, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: What is the highest quality preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p?
A: High settings deliver an average of 64 FPS at 2560x1440. Medium runs at 77 FPS and Low at 100 FPS, but Ultra drops to 49 FPS and is not playable.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in Minimum?
A: The GPU is the limiting factor at all resolutions. The RTX 2060 sits in the 58th percentile of GPUs, while the i7-14700KF sits in the 94th percentile of CPUs. Frame rates drop sharply with resolution, indicating GPU-bound performance.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?
A: The combo ranks 2929 out of 3712 tested combinations. This places it in the lower third of all systems in the database for Minimum performance.
Q: What GPU alternatives would perform similarly to the RTX 2060?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580, AMD Radeon 680M, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, and AMD Radeon RX 7600 all have average benchmark scores within 1% of the RTX 2060. They would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minimum.
Q: What CPU alternatives would perform similarly to the i7-14700KF?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, and Intel Core Ultra 7 265K all have average scores within 1% of the i7-14700KF. Since the GPU is the bottleneck, swapping the CPU among these would not change Minimum's performance.