Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 24 | 35 | 39 | 52 |
| 1440p QHD | 52 | 66 | 79 | 100 |
| 1080p Full HD | 74 | 98 | 120 | 157 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 represents a substantial CPU-side investment paired with a mid-range GPU. In the context of Minimum, the benchmark data reveals that the graphics card is the primary constraint at higher resolutions, while the processor’s headroom becomes apparent only at 1080p. The measured frame rates show a clear scaling pattern that defines the playable envelope for this combination.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the Intel Core i7-14700KF, the nearest rivals in aggregate benchmark scores are closely matched. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69,996, a mere 0.2% lower than the i7-14700KF’s 70,163 average. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX trails by 0.4% with a score of 69,875, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is 0.9% behind at 69,515. The only rival that scores higher is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K, which posts 70,879, a 1% advantage. In practical terms, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame pacing in Minimum when paired with the same GPU, as the bottleneck at 4K and 1440p will be the graphics card.
On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 6600’s average benchmark score of 19,036 places it in a tight cluster with several NVIDIA workstation and mobile parts. The NVIDIA Quadro K6000 scores 19,030, a 0% delta, meaning these two cards are statistically indistinguishable in synthetic tests. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile posts 19,049, just 0.1% higher, while the NVIDIA Tesla K20m scores 19,089, a 0.3% advantage. The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 0.4% behind at 18,954. For Minimum, a system using any of these GPUs would produce frame rates very close to the RX 6600’s measured results, though driver optimizations for consumer gaming could shift real-world performance slightly.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data shows a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU across resolutions. At 3840x2160, the GPU is overwhelmingly the limiting factor. The frame rate drops from 51.7 FPS on Low to 24.4 FPS on Ultra, a decline of 52.8% that tracks almost entirely with the increased pixel shading load. The CPU, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, is not stressed by this workload at 4K; the i7-14700KF’s multi-core score of 44,167 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can handle far more complex scenes than Minimum presents.
At 2560x1440, the GPU remains dominant but the gap between presets narrows. The Low preset achieves 99.6 FPS, while High drops to 66.4 FPS and Ultra falls to 51.9 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a 47.9% reduction, slightly less severe than at 4K, suggesting that some CPU-bound overhead begins to appear at the lower preset. However, the i7-14700KF’s single-core performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2,578 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4,480, ensures that no frame rate is lost to processor stalls.
At 1920x1080, the CPU’s role becomes more visible. The Low preset reaches 156.8 FPS, which is likely near the engine’s rendering ceiling for this title. The Ultra preset still delivers 74 FPS, showing that the GPU can handle the 1080p pixel count even with maximum settings. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p is a 52.8% drop, similar to 4K, but the absolute numbers are high enough that the CPU’s 28 threads are never the binding constraint. The i7-14700KF’s Passmark multi-thread score of 52,425 confirms it has ample headroom for this game’s threading model.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, no preset achieves the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest measured average is 51.7 FPS on Low settings, which falls short of the target. The High preset manages only 35.1 FPS, and Ultra drops to 24.4 FPS. This resolution is not viable for smooth gameplay with this combo.
At 2560x1440, the High preset is the best playable option, delivering 66.4 FPS on average. This clears the 60 FPS threshold by 10.7%. The Medium preset also qualifies at 78.6 FPS, and Low reaches 99.6 FPS, but High offers the best visual quality while maintaining fluidity. Ultra falls below the threshold at 51.9 FPS, so it is not recommended.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is fully playable at 74 FPS, which is 23.3% above the 60 FPS target. This is the highest quality setting that remains smooth. Lower presets provide increasing headroom, with High at 97.7 FPS, Medium at 119.7 FPS, and Low at 156.8 FPS, but none are necessary for a good experience since Ultra already clears the bar comfortably.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K with any settings?*
A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest measured average is 51.7 FPS on Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset averages 35.1 FPS, Medium 38.9 FPS, and Ultra 24.4 FPS.
Q: What is the best setting for 1440p that stays above 60 FPS?
A: The High preset at 2560x1440 delivers 66.4 FPS, which is the most demanding setting that remains playable. Medium and Low also exceed 60 FPS, but High provides the best balance of quality and performance.
Q: Does the Ultra preset work at 1080p?
A: Yes. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 74 FPS, clearing the 60 FPS threshold by a comfortable margin. All four presets at 1080p are playable, with Low reaching 156.8 FPS.
Q: How much faster is the Low preset compared to Ultra at 1080p?
A: The Low preset at 1920x1080 averages 156.8 FPS, which is 111.9% higher than the Ultra preset’s 74 FPS. This indicates the GPU is heavily taxed by the higher-quality effects at 1080p.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck at 1440p?
A: The GPU is the primary constraint at 2560x1440. The frame rate drops from 99.6 FPS on Low to 51.9 FPS on Ultra, a 47.9% reduction that correlates with the increased graphics load. The i7-14700KF’s single-core performance is sufficient to avoid CPU limits.
Q: What is the average frame rate for the Medium preset at 4K?
A: The Medium preset at 3840x2160 averages 38.9 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold but higher than the High preset’s 35.1 FPS.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the measured average frame rates are as follows: Low settings produce 51.7 FPS, Medium produces 38.9 FPS, High produces 35.1 FPS, and Ultra produces 24.4 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 27.3 FPS, representing a 52.8% performance loss when switching to the highest preset. No 4K configuration reaches the 60 FPS target, making this resolution unsuitable for competitive or fluid play.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates improve substantially. Low settings average 99.6 FPS, Medium averages 78.6 FPS, High averages 66.4 FPS, and Ultra averages 51.9 FPS. The step from High to Ultra is the largest single drop, a 14.5 FPS reduction, which pushes Ultra below the playable threshold. The High preset at 66.4 FPS is the recommended ceiling for 1440p.
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best results. Low settings average 156.8 FPS, Medium averages 119.7 FPS, High averages 97.7 FPS, and Ultra averages 74 FPS. All four presets exceed the 60 FPS threshold, with the lowest margin being 14 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from Low to Ultra is consistent, with each preset step costing roughly 20-30 FPS, indicating balanced GPU utilization.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-14700KF and AMD Radeon RX 6600 combination ranks 2,958 out of 3,712 tested combos in Minimum. This places it in the bottom 20.3% of all configurations tested, which is expected given that the GPU is a mid-range part from 2021. The CPU’s high percentile ranking (94th among all CPUs) does not compensate for the GPU’s lower standing (63rd percentile among all GPUs) in this game, as Minimum is primarily GPU-bound at the resolutions where the combo is playable.
The rank of 2,958 means that 754 tested combos perform worse, but the vast majority of tested systems deliver higher frame rates. This is not a reflection of the CPU’s capability, which is excellent, but rather the RX 6600’s limitations at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the combo’s performance is competitive with many higher-tier GPU pairings, as the CPU’s headroom allows the GPU to run at its full potential. However, at 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor, pulling the overall rank down.
The Verdict
The data confirms that this PC can run Minimum at 1080p with all presets above 60 FPS, and at 1440p with most presets above 60 FPS. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 74 FPS, which is the best visual experience available on this hardware. The High preset at 1440p delivers 66.4 FPS, providing a solid middle-ground option for users with 1440p monitors.
At 3840x2160, the verdict is negative: no preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold. The highest average is 51.7 FPS on Low, which is below the playable threshold and would result in noticeable stutter during fast-paced gameplay. Users targeting 4K would need a more powerful GPU.
The i7-14700KF is overqualified for this pairing in Minimum, but it provides future-proofing for more demanding titles. The RX 6600’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for this 2014 game, but the card’s 8.928 TFLOPS FP32 performance limits it to 1080p and 1440p playability. Overall, this combo is a capable 1080p performer and a decent 1440p option, but it cannot handle 4K.