Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 57 | 75 | 89 | 116 |
| 1440p QHD | 106 | 139 | 166 | 216 |
| 1080p Full HD | 164 | 215 | 257 | 335 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti ranks 403rd out of 3712 tested combos for Minimum, placing it in the top 11% of all configurations. This is a strong result for a 2014 third-person shooter, indicating that the combo sits firmly in the upper echelon of tested hardware, though it is not the absolute top performer. The percentile standings reinforce this: the CPU ranks in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 86th percentile among all GPUs, making this a balanced high-end pairing that should handle the game with significant headroom.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the i7-14700K and RTX 5070 Ti achieves a rank of 403 out of 3712 tested combos, which translates to roughly the 89th percentile of all pairings tested for Minimum. This is a commanding position, suggesting that the hardware is far more capable than what the game requires. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 69355 places it just ahead of the AMD EPYC 9115 (69288, +0.1%) and slightly behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69515, -0.2%). On the GPU side, the RTX 5070 Ti’s average benchmark score of 49957 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001, -0.1%) and slightly ahead of the Intel Arc A550M (49737, +0.4%). These scores indicate that while the combo is elite, it is not the absolute fastest single component pairing; however, the in-game rank shows that for Minimum, it is in the top tier of all tested systems.
The rank of 403 is particularly notable because it sits above many combos that feature newer or more expensive parts. The data shows that this pairing is overkill for Minimum, as even the most demanding settings at 4K only dip to 57 FPS on average, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold but still very close. The combo’s high rank is driven by both components being in the top 15% of their respective categories, but the GPU’s slightly lower percentile (86 vs 94) means that the CPU is the more exceptional part of the duo.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a clear pattern where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases, while the CPU’s importance diminishes. At 1080p, the game is heavily CPU-bound, evidenced by the massive frame rate jump from Low (335 FPS) to Ultra (164 FPS) — a 171 FPS difference that shows the GPU is barely stressed. The i7-14700K’s 20 cores and 28 threads, with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, provide ample single-thread performance to drive these high frame rates. Moving to 1440p, the frame rates drop across all settings but remain extremely high: Low runs at 216 FPS and Ultra at 106 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a roughly 35% reduction in FPS at Low settings, indicating the GPU is starting to take on more work.
At 4K, the GPU’s role becomes dominant. The RTX 5070 Ti, with its 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, is pushed harder, but the CPU still delivers enough to keep averages above 75 FPS at High settings. The most telling metric is the transition from 1440p Ultra (106 FPS) to 4K Ultra (57 FPS), a 46% drop that clearly shows the GPU is now the limiting factor. The CPU’s influence is minimal at this resolution, as the i7-14700K can easily feed the GPU. The pattern is consistent: at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU’s high single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2160) ensures no bottleneck, while at 4K, the GPU’s raw throughput (43.94 TFLOPS FP32) determines the final frame rate.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at performance across three resolutions and four settings, with exact average, minimum, and maximum values where available.
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional performance. Low settings produce an average of 335 FPS, which is the highest recorded for this combo. Medium settings average 257 FPS with a minimum of 218 FPS and a maximum of 295 FPS. High settings average 215 FPS, while Ultra settings average 164 FPS. All settings at 1080p are far above the 60 FPS playable threshold, with even the lowest minimum (218 FPS at Medium) being more than triple the threshold.
At 2560x1440, performance remains very high but scales down as expected. Low settings average 216 FPS, Medium averages 166 FPS (min 141, max 190), High averages 139 FPS, and Ultra averages 106 FPS. The minimum recorded FPS at Medium (141) is still more than double the playable threshold, indicating that even in demanding scenes, the combo never drops below smooth performance.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is pushed harder. Low settings average 116 FPS, Medium averages 89 FPS (min 76, max 103), and High averages 75 FPS. Ultra settings drop to an average of 57 FPS, which falls just below the 60 FPS threshold. The minimum FPS at Medium (76) is the only recorded minimum at 4K, and it remains above the threshold, but Ultra’s average of 57 suggests occasional dips below 60 FPS are likely.
The data shows a consistent pattern: each step up in resolution costs roughly 35-45% of the frame rate at the same settings, while each step up in settings from Low to Ultra costs about 50% of the frame rate. The combo is clearly capable of running Minimum at high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p, and at 60+ FPS on High settings at 4K.
FAQ
*Q: Can this combo run Minimum at 4K Ultra settings above 60 FPS?*
A: No. At 3840x2160 Ultra settings, the average FPS is 57, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable setting at 4K is High, which averages 75 FPS.
Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gaming with this hardware?
A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 average 106 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that remains well above the 60 FPS threshold. All four settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at this resolution.
Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti compare to the AMD RX 6900 XT in raw GPU benchmarks?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 49957, while the RX 6900 XT scores 50951, which is 2% higher. The RTX 5070 Ti is also 3.1% ahead of the RX 6800 XT (48477).
Q: Is the i7-14700K faster than the Ryzen 9 7950X in average CPU benchmarks?
A: No. The i7-14700K scores 69355 on average, while the Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515, making the 7950X 0.2% faster. The i7-14700K is 0.1% faster than the EPYC 9115 (69288).
Q: What minimum FPS can be expected at 1080p Medium settings?
A: The minimum recorded FPS at 1920x1080 Medium is 218 FPS, with an average of 257 FPS and a maximum of 295 FPS.
Q: Does the combo maintain 60 FPS at 4K Low settings?
A: Yes, 4K Low settings average 116 FPS, which is nearly double the 60 FPS threshold. Even 4K Medium averages 89 FPS, and 4K High averages 75 FPS, all above the playable mark.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the nearest rivals in the benchmark database, several other components would deliver nearly identical performance in Minimum. On the CPU side, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is the closest match, with an average benchmark score just 0.2% higher than the i7-14700K. The AMD EPYC 9115 is also nearly identical, sitting just 0.1% lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (0.7% higher) and AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (0.9% higher) would also behave similarly in this game, given that Minimum is not CPU-intensive at 4K.
For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is the closest rival, with an average score only 0.1% lower than the RTX 5070 Ti. The Intel Arc A550M is 0.4% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is 2% faster and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is 3.1% slower. In practice, any of these GPUs paired with the i7-14700K would produce frame rates within a few percent of the measured results. The RX 6900 XT would offer a slight edge at 4K Ultra, potentially pushing the average from 57 FPS to around 58-59 FPS, but the difference would be negligible in actual gameplay.
The data suggests that swapping the i7-14700K for a Ryzen 9 7950X or swapping the RTX 5070 Ti for an RX 6900 XT would result in virtually identical performance in Minimum. For users looking at the nearestRivals list, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT represent the upper boundary of what this combo can be upgraded to, while the Intel Arc A550M and AMD Ryzen 7 9700F are the closest lower-bound alternatives.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which averages 75 FPS. This is the recommended setting for 4K, as it provides a comfortable margin above the playable threshold. Ultra at 4K averages 57 FPS and is not recommended for consistent 60 FPS gameplay.
At 2560x1440, Ultra settings are the best choice, averaging 106 FPS. This is the maximum preset available, and it still delivers nearly double the playable threshold. There is no reason to lower settings at this resolution, as even the most demanding option provides smooth performance.
At 1920x1080, Ultra settings average 164 FPS, making it the clear recommendation. The combo has so much headroom at 1080p that even the highest preset leaves significant performance on the table. The data shows that this resolution is where the CPU’s strength is most apparent, with frame rates exceeding 300 FPS at Low settings, but Ultra remains the best balance of visual quality and speed.
For players prioritizing maximum frame rates, 1080p Low delivers 335 FPS, but the visual quality loss is unnecessary given the hardware’s capability. The verdict data confirms that High at 4K, Ultra at 1440p, and Ultra at 1080p are the optimal settings for this combo, ensuring the game runs smoothly at or above 60 FPS across all three resolutions.