Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 41 | 53 | 60 | 79 |
| 1440p QHD | 74 | 98 | 112 | 150 |
| 1080p Full HD | 111 | 147 | 175 | 232 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 delivers a highly capable 1080p and 1440p experience in Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter. Benchmark results show this combination easily exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold at both of those resolutions even on the most demanding preset. At 4K, the combo remains playable but requires a reduction in settings to maintain fluid frame rates, with the data indicating a clear performance ceiling that is more dependent on the GPU than the CPU.
Best Settings per Resolution
Based on the measured frame rates and the established playable threshold of 60 FPS, the optimal settings for this combo are as follows:
- 3840x2160 (4K): The best playable setting is Medium, which produces an average of 60.4 FPS. This sits right at the playable threshold. While the High preset is visually superior, it drops to 53 FPS average, which falls below the 60 FPS target. Low settings are also playable at 79.4 FPS, but Medium provides a better balance of visual quality and performance. The Ultra preset is not viable at this resolution, with an average of only 40.5 FPS.
- 2560x1440 (1440p): You can run the game at the highest Ultra preset, achieving an average of 74.4 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the clear choice for the best visual experience. All other presets, including High (97.7 FPS), Medium (111.6 FPS), and Low (149.9 FPS), are also playable, but Ultra offers the most headroom for visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness.
- 1920x1080 (1080p): The game is thoroughly playable at the maximum Ultra preset, with a strong average of 110.6 FPS. This is more than enough for a smooth experience on a standard 60Hz monitor and leaves significant performance headroom for high-refresh-rate displays. The data shows that even the most demanding settings are easily handled at this resolution.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions and presets makes the roles of each component clear. This game, given its age, is heavily GPU-bound, particularly at higher resolutions and settings.
The CPU, an Intel Core i7-14700K with 20 cores and 28 threads, is never a limiting factor. Even at 1080p with Low settings, where CPU load is typically highest, the average frame rate reaches 231.8 FPS. This indicates the processor has ample headroom to feed frames to the GPU. Its performance percentile of 94 versus all CPUs confirms it is a top-tier part, far exceeding the demands of this title.
The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, is the primary determinant of performance. This is evident from the significant frame rate drops as resolution increases. Moving from 1080p Ultra (110.6 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (74.4 FPS) is a 32.7% decrease in performance. The drop from 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra (40.5 FPS) is an even more substantial 45.6% reduction. These steep declines are classic indicators of GPU-bound scaling, where the rendering load on the graphics card increases dramatically with pixel count.
Similarly, the settings presets show a large GPU workload. At 4K, the difference between Low (79.4 FPS) and Ultra (40.5 FPS) is a 49% performance swing, demonstrating the heavy cost of the Ultra preset's visual effects. The CPU's role is secondary; it provides a stable foundation, but the RTX 3070 is the component that dictates whether the game can hold 60 FPS at a given resolution and quality level.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following is the complete set of measured average FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination in Minimum.
3840x2160 (4K):
- Ultra: 40.5 FPS
- High: 53 FPS
- Medium: 60.4 FPS
- Low: 79.4 FPS
2560x1440 (1440p):
- Ultra: 74.4 FPS
- High: 97.7 FPS
- Medium: 111.6 FPS
- Low: 149.9 FPS
1920x1080 (1080p):
- Ultra: 110.6 FPS
- High: 147.3 FPS
- Medium: 175.4 FPS
- Low: 231.8 FPS
The data shows a consistent and predictable pattern. Performance scales almost linearly with resolution and settings. The gap between Low and Ultra settings is significant at every resolution, emphasizing the graphical demands of the Ultra preset. The 1080p results are exceptionally high, reinforcing that the RTX 3070 is overqualified for this title at that resolution.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For builders looking at comparable hardware, the benchmark data for the CPU and GPU provides several close alternatives that would deliver a similar experience in this game.
CPU Alternatives: The Intel Core i7-14700K has an average benchmark score of 69355. Its nearest rivals are all within a 1% performance delta, meaning you would see virtually no difference in Minimum:
- AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (avg score 69515) is 0.2% faster.
- AMD EPYC 9115 (avg score 69288) is 0.1% slower.
- AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (avg score 69875) is 0.7% faster.
- AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (avg score 69996) is 0.9% faster.
Any of these processors would eliminate the CPU as a potential bottleneck, offering the same high frame rates seen in the 1080p Low setting.
GPU Alternatives: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 has an average benchmark score of 17208. Its performance bracket includes a few interesting options, though the deltas are slightly larger than those for the CPU:
- AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (avg score 17083) is 0.7% slower.
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (avg score 17037) is 1% slower.
- AMD Radeon HD 7970M (avg score 17019) is 1.1% slower.
- NVIDIA Tesla K40c (avg score 17468) is 1.5% faster.
With the RTX 3070 sitting at the 61st percentile of all GPUs, these alternatives would produce nearly identical frame rates. For example, a system with an RX 7600 XT would likely hit around 73.9 FPS at 1440p Ultra, a negligible difference from the 74.4 FPS measured here.
How This Combo Ranks
Out of 3712 tested combinations, this CPU and GPU pairing ranks 1571st for performance in Minimum. This places it in the upper-middle tier of all tested systems. The ranking reflects that while this is not a top-tier enthusiast setup for this game, it is far from a low-end one. The strong 1080p and 1440p performance is offset by the fact that many more powerful combinations can achieve higher frame rates, particularly at 4K where the RTX 3070 starts to struggle with the Ultra preset. This rank is a useful indicator that the combo offers a solid, well-rounded experience for the majority of players, though those with 4K Ultra ambitions would need to look at higher-performing GPUs.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Minimum at 4K with the highest settings?*
A: No. At 4K with the Ultra preset, the system produces an average of 40.5 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best playable setting at 4K is Medium, which achieves 60.4 FPS.
Q: What is the best preset for a 1440p monitor?
A: The data indicates that the Ultra preset is the best choice at 2560x1440, as it maintains an average of 74.4 FPS, comfortably above the playable threshold.
Q: How much faster is the game at 1080p compared to 1440p on Ultra settings?
A: At 1920x1080 on Ultra, the average FPS is 110.6. At 2560x1440 on Ultra, it is 74.4. This represents a performance increase of approximately 48.7% at 1080p.
Q: Is the Intel Core i7-14700K a bottleneck for the RTX 3070 in this game?
A: No. Benchmark results show the CPU is not a limiting factor. At 1080p with Low settings, the system reaches 231.8 FPS, indicating the CPU has significant headroom and the GPU is the primary performance constraint.
*Q: Which component is more important for performance in Minimum?*
A: The GPU is the more critical component. This is shown by the steep frame rate drops as resolution increases, which is a signature of GPU-bound workloads. The CPU's impact is minimal beyond providing a fast enough platform.
Q: How does the RTX 3070 compare to a Radeon RX 7600 XT in this context?
A: The RX 7600 XT is a very close rival, with an average benchmark score 0.7% lower than the RTX 3070. In practical terms, both cards would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Minimum, likely differing by only 1-2 FPS at most settings.