Minimum

The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is an overwhelmingly capable combination for Minimum, a 2014 Third-Person Shooter. Benchmark data shows this system clears the 60 FPS playability threshold at every tested resolution and preset, including maximum settings at 4K. The only caveat is that at 4K Ultra, the average frame rate of 63 FPS leaves a relatively slim margin above the threshold, whereas lower resolutions and settings provide a far more substantial buffer.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU and GPU in this configuration both sit in the upper echelon of their respective benchmark hierarchies, but the data reveals some interesting near-neighbors. For the Intel Core i7-14700F, its average benchmark score of 53620 places it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals are remarkably close in aggregate performance. The Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53701, a negligible 0.2% difference, while the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 trails by only 0.3% with a score of 53469. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is also within striking distance, posting a 53288 average score, which is 0.6% behind the i7-14700F. The AMD EPYC 7313P rounds out the group with a 53206 score, a 0.8% deficit. For gaming purposes, these differences are effectively imperceptible; any of these processors would deliver essentially identical frame rates in Minimum when paired with the same GPU.

On the graphics side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 holds an average benchmark score of 56083, placing it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show a more interesting spread. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is actually ahead, scoring 57367, which is 2.2% higher than the RTX 5080. Conversely, the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757 (0.6% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 (0.7% behind). The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X trails by a more noticeable 2.3% with a score of 54828. While these deltas are small in raw percentage terms, the benchmark results indicate that a system built around any of these GPUs, paired with a similarly performing CPU, would produce very similar frame rates. A gamer choosing the RX 9070 GRE might see a marginal edge in GPU-bound scenarios, but the i7-14700F’s strong single-thread and multi-thread performance would likely keep the CPU from being a bottleneck in this older title.

How This Combo Ranks

The data places this specific CPU-GPU combination in a strong position within the broader database of tested systems. The combo achieves a rank of 209 out of 3712 tested combinations, placing it in the top 5.6% of all configurations. This is a decisive indicator that this hardware pairing is far more powerful than what Minimum requires. The rank reflects the combined potential of the 20-core, 28-thread i7-14700F and the Blackwell-architecture RTX 5080. While the game itself is from 2014, the hardware is from 2024 and 2025, respectively, creating a massive generational gap in compute capability. The high rank suggests that for most other titles, this system would also perform admirably, but for Minimum specifically, it is overkill.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at performance across resolutions and settings. The system was tested at three resolutions (3840x2160, 2560x1440, 1920x1080) and four quality presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra). The data shows a clear and predictable scaling pattern.

At 3840x2160 (4K) , the system remains comfortably playable at all settings. The lowest average FPS is 63 at Ultra settings, which still clears the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings yield an average of 98 FPS, with a minimum of 83 FPS and a maximum of 113 FPS, indicating a stable experience with no significant frame drops. High settings push the average to 82 FPS, while Low settings reach 128 FPS. The frame time consistency at 4K is generally good, with the only recorded min/max data showing a 30 FPS spread on Medium, which is still within a reasonable range.

Moving to 2560x1440 (1440p) , performance scales up significantly. At Ultra, the average FPS jumps to 117, which is nearly double the 4K result. High settings produce an average of 153 FPS. Medium settings deliver 182 FPS, with a minimum of 155 FPS and a maximum of 210 FPS, showcasing excellent consistency. Low settings hit an average of 238 FPS, a figure that would push the limits of many high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 1920x1080 (1080p) , the system is completely unchained. The average FPS at Ultra is 181, which is higher than the 4K Medium result. High settings reach 237 FPS, and Medium settings average 283 FPS with a tight minimum of 240 FPS and a maximum of 325 FPS. The Low preset produces an astonishing 369 FPS average. These numbers are far beyond the refresh rate capabilities of most displays, indicating that the CPU and GPU combination is not being fully stressed at 1080p.

The Verdict

The verdict from the benchmark data is unequivocal: this PC can run Minimum at maximum settings across all tested resolutions. The `verdictByResolution` data confirms that all four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080. The `playableThresholdFps` is set at 60 FPS, and the system exceeds this at every single measurement point.

At 4K, the `bestSettings` are Ultra with an average FPS of 63. This is a playable result, but it is important to note that the margin is only 3 FPS. For gamers who prioritize a higher frame rate buffer at 4K, dropping to High settings increases the average to 82 FPS, a much safer margin. At 1440p, the system achieves an average of 117 FPS at Ultra, providing both excellent visual fidelity and a smooth, high-refresh-rate experience. At 1080p, the average of 181 FPS at Ultra is more than sufficient for any high-refresh-rate gaming setup, including 165Hz or 240Hz monitors.

In summary, the hardware is more than capable of handling Minimum with headroom to spare. The only scenario where a user might consider lowering settings is at 4K Ultra, where the frame rate, while above 60 FPS, does not offer a large cushion against potential frame drops in more demanding scenes.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K Ultra settings?*

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 63 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves at 1080p?

A: The highest average FPS recorded at 1920x1080 is 369, achieved with the Low settings preset.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE?

A: The benchmark data shows the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has an average score of 57367, which is 2.2% higher than the RTX 5080's average score of 56083.

Q: What is the performance difference between the i7-14700F and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53620, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288. This puts the i7-14700F 0.6% ahead.

Q: At which resolution and settings does the system show the smallest margin above the 60 FPS threshold?

A: The smallest margin is at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, where the average FPS is 63, leaving only a 3 FPS buffer.

Q: How does the combo rank among all other tested hardware combinations for this game?

A: The combination ranks 209th out of 3712 tested combos, placing it in the top 5.6% of all configurations.

Best Settings per Resolution

The data indicates that the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is the same at every resolution: Ultra. The system has enough headroom to run the game at its highest visual fidelity everywhere.

At 3840x2160, the best settings are Ultra, with an average FPS of 63. While this is playable, it is the only scenario where the frame rate is close to the 60 FPS threshold. Users with 120Hz or higher 4K displays may prefer High settings (82 FPS average) for a more consistent high-refresh experience, but for a standard 60Hz display, Ultra is the recommended choice.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are Ultra, yielding an average FPS of 117. This provides a smooth experience on 144Hz monitors and is a definitive recommendation for visual quality without sacrificing performance.

At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, with an average FPS of 181. This is far beyond the needs of even the fastest 1080p gaming monitors, allowing for maximum graphical fidelity with a massive performance surplus. There is no reason to reduce settings at this resolution.