Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 25 | 32 | 39 | 50 |
| 1440p QHD | 46 | 60 | 72 | 94 |
| 1080p Full HD | 71 | 93 | 111 | 145 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700F and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a playable experience in Minimum at 1080p and 1440p, but it falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K. The data shows this combo ranks 2984th out of 3712 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-mid tier for this specific title. That ranking is not a reflection of weak components, but rather of the game's demanding nature at higher resolutions combined with the Arc B570's performance ceiling. The measured frame rates confirm a clear pattern: this pairing is capable, but it has hard limits.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo’s rank of 2984 out of 3712 tested combinations puts it in the 20th percentile of all tested systems for Minimum. This is a low placement, and the benchmark data explains why. The Arc B570, with a percentile of 65 among all GPUs, is a mid-range card. The Core i7-14700F, by contrast, is a high-end processor with a 91st percentile ranking. The pairing is therefore CPU-heavy in terms of raw benchmark potential, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor in this game.
The measured FPS at 4K tells the story of the ranking. At 3840x2160, the combo cannot hit 60 FPS on any setting. Even on Low, it averages only 50 FPS. At Medium, it drops to 39 FPS, and at High it falls to 32 FPS. Ultra is worse at 25 FPS. These numbers are all below the 60 FPS playable threshold, which is why the verdict for 4K lists no playable settings. The rank is a reflection of this failure at the highest resolution. Compared to the 94 FPS average at 1440p Low, the 4K Low result of 50 FPS represents a substantial performance cliff, indicating that the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute resources are overwhelmed when pixel count rises.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide context for what other hardware would behave similarly. The Core i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53620. Its closest rival is the Intel Xeon 6505P, which scores 53701, a negligible 0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288, which is 0.6% slower. The AMD EPYC 7313P is 0.8% slower with a score of 53206. In gaming, the difference between these processors is likely to be minimal, as all are high-core-count chips that can feed a mid-range GPU without bottlenecking.
For the GPU, the Intel Arc B570 has an average score of 20556. The closest rival is the Intel Arc A750, which scores 20582, a 0.1% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, which is 0.1% slower. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, a 0.5% advantage. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M is 0.4% slower with a score of 20480. In practice, a system with an Arc A750 or a RTX 3070 Mobile would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Minimum as the Arc B570. The differences are so small they would be imperceptible in real gameplay.
CPU and GPU Roles
Benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this combo for Minimum, especially as resolution increases. The CPU is overqualified for the task. The Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads, a 5.40 GHz boost clock, and scores 35122 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. This level of processing power is far beyond what a third-person shooter from 2014 requires. The game's release date of 2014-06-25 suggests it was designed for hardware from that era, so the 14700F is unlikely to be a limiting factor at any settings.
The data supports this conclusion. At 1080p, the jump from Low to Ultra costs performance: 145 FPS on Low, 111 FPS on Medium, 93 FPS on High, and 71 FPS on Ultra. The scaling is consistent. At 1440p, the same pattern holds: 94 FPS on Low, 72 FPS on Medium, 60 FPS on High, and 46 FPS on Ultra. At 4K, the scaling becomes more severe. Low is 50 FPS, Medium is 39 FPS, High is 32 FPS, and Ultra is 25 FPS. The performance drop from 1440p to 4K is steep, showing the GPU is running out of resources.
The CPU's role is to feed the GPU with data. At 1080p, the CPU can easily keep up with the Arc B570's demands. At 4K, the CPU is still not the issue; the GPU's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for the higher pixel count. The 160-bit memory bus and 2304 shading units are simply not enough to maintain 60 FPS at 4K in this title. The CPU's performance is static across resolutions, while the GPU's performance degrades. This confirms the GPU is the deciding factor for playability.
FAQ
*Q: Can this combo run Minimum at 4K?*
A: No. The data shows no playable settings at 3840x2160. The best average FPS at 4K is 50 on Low, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 39 FPS, High averages 32 FPS, and Ultra averages 25 FPS.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?
A: The highest playable setting at 2560x1440 is High, which averages exactly 60 FPS. Medium averages 72 FPS and Low averages 94 FPS. Ultra is not playable, averaging only 46 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game?
A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The Core i7-14700F is a high-end processor with a 91st percentile ranking, while the Arc B570 is a mid-range card with a 65th percentile. The measured FPS drops significantly at higher resolutions, indicating the GPU's resources are exhausted.
Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to the Arc A750?
A: They are nearly identical. The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, while the Arc A750 scores 20582. The delta is 0.1% in favor of the A750, which is imperceptible in practice.
Q: What is the maximum FPS this combo achieves?
A: The highest average FPS recorded is 145 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. At Medium, the average is 111 FPS, with a minimum of 95 FPS and a maximum of 128 FPS.
Q: Is the 14700F a bottleneck for the Arc B570?
A: No. The CPU's benchmark scores, such as 35122 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 41317 in Passmark multithread, show it is far more powerful than necessary. The game's frame rates are limited by the GPU, not the CPU.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across resolutions and settings. All results are from the Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the Intel Arc B570.
At 1920x1080, the combo performs best. Low settings produce an average of 145 FPS. Medium settings average 111 FPS, with a minimum of 95 FPS and a maximum of 128 FPS. High settings average 93 FPS. Ultra settings average 71 FPS. All settings at 1080p are above the 60 FPS playable threshold, making this the optimal resolution for the combo.
At 2560x1440, performance drops but remains playable for most settings. Low settings average 94 FPS. Medium settings average 72 FPS, with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS. High settings average exactly 60 FPS. Ultra settings average 46 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. The 1440p results show a clear progression: the combo can handle the resolution, but only up to High settings.
At 3840x2160, the combo struggles. Low settings average 50 FPS. Medium settings average 39 FPS, with a minimum of 33 FPS and a maximum of 44 FPS. High settings average 32 FPS. Ultra settings average 25 FPS. No setting at 4K reaches 60 FPS, so the game is not playable at this resolution. The gap between 1440p High (60 FPS) and 4K Low (50 FPS) illustrates the GPU's inability to handle the 4K pixel count.
Best Settings per Resolution
The data identifies the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS for each resolution. The playable threshold is 60 FPS.
At 1920x1080, the best playable setting is Ultra, which averages 71 FPS. This is the highest visual quality available while maintaining a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. Lower settings offer higher frame rates, but Ultra is the best balance of quality and performance.
At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is High, which averages exactly 60 FPS. This is the maximum quality that hits the playable threshold. Medium averages 72 FPS and Low averages 94 FPS, but High offers the best visual fidelity without dropping below 60 FPS. Ultra is not playable, averaging only 46 FPS.
At 3840x2160, there is no playable setting. The best average FPS is 50 on Low, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The verdict data confirms this, listing no playable settings for 4K. Users who want to play at this resolution will need to lower the resolution or upgrade the GPU. The Arc B570's 10 GB of VRAM and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are not sufficient for 4K in Minimum.