Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 30 | 39 | 47 | 61 |
| 1440p QHD | 56 | 73 | 87 | 114 |
| 1080p Full HD | 87 | 114 | 135 | 177 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT delivers a highly playable experience in Minimum, with benchmark data showing that 1080p Ultra settings remain comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. The combination ranks 2422nd out of 3712 tested combos for this title, placing it in the upper-middle tier of systems. Across all three tested resolutions, the data indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as the 20-core, 28-thread i7-14700F provides ample headroom for the Radeon RX 6650 XT to operate at its maximum potential.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates strong performance across all presets. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 87 FPS, which is 45% above the playable threshold of 60 FPS. Stepping down to High yields an average of 114 FPS, a 31% improvement over Ultra. The Medium preset records an average of 135 FPS with a minimum of 115 FPS and a maximum of 156 FPS, showing consistent frame pacing. The Low preset reaches an average of 177 FPS, representing a 103% increase over the Ultra setting. These results indicate that 1080p is well within the comfortable operating range for this hardware combination, with even the most demanding preset maintaining a 27 FPS margin above the playability threshold.
Moving to 2560x1440, the data shows a predictable performance scaling pattern. The High preset achieves an average of 73 FPS, which is 21.7% above the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset averages 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS, making it the strongest performer at this resolution. The Low preset reaches an average of 114 FPS, representing a 56% improvement over the High setting. However, the Ultra preset falls to an average of 56 FPS, which is 6.7% below the playable threshold. This makes 1440p Ultra the first settings combination that fails to maintain consistent 60 FPS gameplay, though the difference is marginal.
At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates at higher presets. The Low preset is the only setting that clears the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 61 FPS — a razor-thin 1 FPS margin above the playable mark. The Medium preset averages 47 FPS with a minimum of 40 FPS and a maximum of 54 FPS, showing significant frame drops below the threshold. The High preset averages 39 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to an average of 30 FPS. The data reveals a steep performance cliff between Low and Medium settings at 4K, suggesting that the 8 GB VRAM capacity of the Radeon RX 6650 XT becomes a limiting factor at this resolution when texture quality increases.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Minimum at 1080p with maximum settings?*
A: Yes. Benchmark data shows the Ultra preset at 1920x1080 averages 87 FPS, which is 45% above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the most demanding preset tested at this resolution, and it remains comfortably playable.
Q: What is the highest playable setting at 1440p?
A: The High preset at 2560x1440 averages 73 FPS, making it the most demanding setting that maintains 60+ FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 56 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?
A: Only at the Low preset, which averages 61 FPS at 3840x2160. The Medium preset drops to 47 FPS, and the High and Ultra presets fall to 39 FPS and 30 FPS respectively. The minimum frame rates at Medium (40 FPS) indicate inconsistent performance at this resolution.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53620, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6505P, scores 53701 with a delta of -0.2%, meaning they perform nearly identically. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X trails by 0.6% with a score of 53288.
Q: What GPU alternatives offer similar performance to the RX 6650 XT?
A: The Radeon RX 6650 XT has an average benchmark score of 19765, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. The NVIDIA Tesla K40m scores 19885 (-0.6% delta), while the AMD FirePro W7000 scores 19905 (-0.7% delta). The AMD FirePro D300 and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 score 19637 (+0.7%) and 19602 (+0.8%) respectively, all within 1% of the RX 6650 XT's performance.
Q: What frame rates can be expected at Medium settings across resolutions?
A: The Medium preset delivers 135 FPS average at 1080p (115 minimum, 156 maximum), 87 FPS average at 1440p (74 minimum, 100 maximum), and 47 FPS average at 4K (40 minimum, 54 maximum). Only the 1080p and 1440p results meet the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest rivals show that the i7-14700F sits in a tightly packed performance cluster. The Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53701, a mere 0.2% difference from the i7-14700F's 53620 average benchmark score. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469, representing a 0.3% gap. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288, trailing by 0.6%, while the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206, a 0.8% difference. All four rivals fall within a performance window of less than 1%, meaning users upgrading from any of these processors would see negligible differences in Minimum frame rates. The i7-14700F's 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates that these rivals are all high-end processors with similar multi-threaded capabilities.
For the GPU side, the Radeon RX 6650 XT's nearest rivals present an interesting comparison due to their professional-oriented nature. The NVIDIA Tesla K40m scores 19885, which is 0.6% higher than the RX 6650 XT's 19765 average. The AMD FirePro W7000 scores 19905, a 0.7% advantage. On the lower side, the AMD FirePro D300 scores 19637 (0.7% lower) and the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 scores 19602 (0.8% lower). In practical terms for Minimum, all five GPUs would deliver virtually identical frame rates, with differences of less than 1 FPS at any given resolution and settings combination. The RX 6650 XT's 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests that these professional cards offer comparable gaming performance despite their workstation focus.
When considering the full combination, the CPU's headroom means that swapping the i7-14700F for any of its nearest rivals would not change the measured FPS results in Minimum, as the RX 6650 XT remains the limiting factor in all tested configurations. Conversely, replacing the RX 6650 XT with any of its nearest rivals would produce frame rate variations of less than 1% across all resolutions and presets.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT combination ranks 2422nd out of 3712 tested combos for Minimum, placing it in the 34th percentile of all systems tested. This ranking reflects the GPU's mid-range positioning rather than the CPU's high-end capabilities. The i7-14700F alone sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the RX 6650 XT sits in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. The combination's ranking suggests that the 2422nd position is primarily driven by GPU performance, as the CPU is overqualified for this workload.
The rank becomes more meaningful when considering the frame rate data. At 1080p, the system outperforms roughly one-third of all tested combinations, delivering 87 FPS at Ultra settings. This places it in a competitive position for 1080p gaming, though the 4K performance (30 FPS at Ultra) drags down its overall ranking. The 3712 total combos include systems with much more powerful GPUs that would achieve significantly higher 4K frame rates, explaining why the rank is not higher despite the strong 1080p showing.
The Verdict
This system can run Minimum with playable performance at 1080p and 1440p, but 4K is only viable at the lowest settings. At 1920x1080, all four tested presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — achieve average frame rates above 60 FPS, with the lowest result being 87 FPS at Ultra. At 2560x1440, the High, Medium, and Low presets all clear the 60 FPS threshold, with the High preset averaging 73 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p fails to meet the playability standard, averaging 56 FPS.
At 3840x2160, only the Low preset achieves playable performance, averaging 61 FPS — a marginal 1 FPS above the threshold. The Medium, High, and Ultra presets all fall below 60 FPS, with averages of 47, 39, and 30 FPS respectively. The data indicates that players seeking 4K performance would need to either accept Low settings or consider more powerful hardware. For the majority of users targeting 1080p or 1440p gaming, this combination provides a smooth experience across the most common quality presets.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the best playable setting is Ultra, which achieves an average of 87 FPS. This is the most demanding preset tested, and it maintains a 27 FPS margin above the 60 FPS threshold. Players can enjoy maximum visual quality without compromising frame rate at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is High, delivering an average of 73 FPS. The Ultra preset falls short of the 60 FPS threshold with 56 FPS, so High represents the optimal balance of visual quality and performance. The 73 FPS average provides a 13 FPS buffer above the playability mark.
At 3840x2160, the only playable setting is Low, which averages 61 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, but the margin is extremely thin — just 1 FPS. The Medium preset at 47 FPS and the High preset at 39 FPS demonstrate that the RX 6650 XT lacks the memory bandwidth and capacity to handle higher quality settings at 4K resolution. Players using this combination for 4K gaming should expect to run the game at reduced visual fidelity to maintain smooth performance.