Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 29 | 38 | 45 | 59 |
| 1440p QHD | 54 | 70 | 84 | 110 |
| 1080p Full HD | 83 | 109 | 130 | 170 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT combination delivers a wide performance envelope in Minimum, ranging from unplayable at 4K to highly fluid at 1080p. The data shows a system that is clearly GPU-bound at higher resolutions, but one that can still achieve the 60 FPS threshold with the right settings. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, compares nearby hardware, and provides clear guidance on which settings to use.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The benchmark database places the Intel Core i7-14700F in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53620. Its nearest rivals in synthetic workloads are extremely close. The Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53701, which is a mere 0.2% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and AMD EPYC 7313P are also within a single percentage point, scoring 53288 and 53206 respectively (0.6% and 0.8% behind). The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 completes the group with a score of 53469 (0.3% behind). For gaming purposes, this means any of these processors would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Minimum, as the CPU is not the limiting factor in most scenarios tested here.
On the GPU side, the Radeon RX 6600 XT sits in the 70th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 24442. Its nearest rivals are a mixed bag. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 scores 24277 (0.7% lower), while the Intel Arc A350M scores 24647 (0.8% higher). The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti and RTX 2080 SUPER are also in the same performance band, with scores of 24236 and 24170 (0.8% and 1.1% behind, respectively). In Minimum, users with any of these GPUs paired with a comparable CPU should expect similar average frame rates, though the exact minimum and maximum values may vary. The RTX 2080 SUPER being within 1.1% is notable, as it places the RX 6600 XT in a higher performance tier than its architectural generation might suggest.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance data for Minimum shows a classic shift in bottleneck behavior across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 170 FPS on Low settings, which indicates the GPU is capable of massive output and the CPU is feeding it adequately. As resolution increases to 2560x1440, that Low setting average drops to 110 FPS, and at 3840x2160 it falls to 59 FPS. This scaling pattern—a roughly 35% drop from 1080p to 1440p and another 46% drop from 1440p to 4K—is characteristic of a GPU-bound workload where pixel throughput dictates performance.
The settings scaling further clarifies the GPU's dominance. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces the average from 170 FPS to 83 FPS, a 51% decrease. At 1440p, the same settings change drops performance from 110 FPS to 54 FPS (51% decrease). At 4K, the drop is from 59 FPS to 29 FPS, again roughly a 51% reduction. This consistent halving of frame rate when moving from the lowest to highest preset across all resolutions is strong evidence that the Radeon RX 6600 XT is the primary performance arbiter. The CPU's role is to ensure the GPU is never starved, and given the high frame rates at 1080p Low, the i7-14700F is clearly up to the task.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the RX 6600 XT struggles. The Low preset produces an average of 59 FPS, just under the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 45 FPS, with minimums of 38 and maximums of 52. High averages 38 FPS, and Ultra drops to 29 FPS. No 4K setting achieves a playable average, though Low is tantalizingly close.
At 2560x1440, the picture improves substantially. Low averages 110 FPS. Medium averages 84 FPS, with a minimum of 71 and maximum of 97. High averages 70 FPS. Ultra falls below the threshold at 54 FPS. Three of the four presets clear 60 FPS, with High being the most demanding playable option.
At 1920x1080, the system is fully unleashed. Low averages 170 FPS. Medium averages 130 FPS, with a minimum of 111 and maximum of 150. High averages 109 FPS. Ultra averages 83 FPS. Every preset clears 60 FPS, and even the maximum preset provides a comfortable cushion above the playability line.
The Verdict
According to the verdictByResolution data, this PC can run Minimum at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440, but not at 3840x2160. At 1080p, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with the best setting being Ultra at 83 FPS average. At 1440p, Low, Medium, and High are playable, with High being the best at 70 FPS average. At 4K, no settings are playable; even Low falls one FPS short of the 60 FPS target. The data indicates this is a solid 1080p and capable 1440p gaming system for this title, but 4K requires a reduction in resolution or a hardware upgrade.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT ranks 2635 out of 3712 tested combos in Minimum. This places it in the 71st percentile of all tested systems, which is a respectable position. However, the ranking is likely dragged down by the GPU's performance at 4K, where it cannot achieve 60 FPS. In the broader context of the benchmark database, this combo sits in the upper-middle tier. The CPU's high percentile (91st) is balanced by the GPU's lower percentile (70th), resulting in a system that is well-matched for 1080p and 1440p gaming but not for 4K. Users with this pairing should focus on the lower resolutions to get the best experience.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers an average of 83 FPS. This is the optimal choice for visual fidelity without sacrificing playability. At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, averaging 70 FPS. While Medium offers a higher frame rate (84 FPS), High provides better visuals while still clearing the 60 FPS bar. At 3840x2160, there is no playable preset. The Low preset averages 59 FPS, which is just below the threshold, so users at this resolution must either accept sub-60 FPS performance or lower the resolution to 1440p.
For those seeking maximum frame rates, 1080p Low produces 170 FPS, and 1440p Low produces 110 FPS. The data shows that the RX 6600 XT has significant headroom at 1080p, allowing for high-refresh-rate monitors to be fully utilized.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Minimum at 4K with any settings?*
A: No. At 3840x2160, the best average FPS is 59 on Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra average 45, 38, and 29 FPS, respectively.
Q: What is the highest setting at 1440p that maintains 60 FPS?
A: The High preset at 2560x1440 averages 70 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 54 FPS, which is not playable.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?
A: The GPU is the limiting factor. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 170 FPS, and the Ultra preset achieves 83 FPS—a 51% reduction that correlates with the GPU's workload scaling.
Q: How does the RX 6600 XT compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 2080 SUPER?
A: The RX 6600 XT has an average benchmark score of 24442, while the RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24170. This makes the RX 6600 XT 1.1% faster in synthetic tests.
Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for the Medium preset at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the minimum FPS is 111, with an average of 130 and a maximum of 150.
Q: What percentile does this CPU rank in globally?
A: The Intel Core i7-14700F is in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53620.