Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 27 | 37 | 46 | 61 |
| 1440p QHD | 52 | 71 | 86 | 110 |
| 1080p Full HD | 83 | 111 | 131 | 169 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti delivers a playable experience in Minimum at 1080p and 1440p, but falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K except on the lowest settings. The data shows a clear hierarchy where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases, while the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance keeps frame rates high at lower resolutions. The measured FPS values, drawn from 12 distinct resolution/settings combinations, provide a complete picture of this combo's capabilities.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the only preset that maintains an average FPS at or above 60 is Low, which achieves exactly 60.5 FPS. This is a minimal margin above the playable threshold, meaning any in-game variance could push it below 60. The Medium preset drops to 45.6 FPS, High falls to 36.9 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 27.1 FPS — all clearly unplayable for smooth gameplay.
At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, delivering 70.5 FPS. This leaves meaningful headroom above the threshold, making High the recommended choice for 1440p. The Medium preset runs at 85.8 FPS, and Low at 109.9 FPS, but High offers the best visual quality while still clearing 60 FPS comfortably.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is viable, averaging 82.6 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available and it remains well above the 60 FPS floor. The High preset runs at 111.2 FPS, Medium at 131.4 FPS, and Low at 168.9 FPS, but since Ultra clears the threshold with over 20 FPS of headroom, it is the best settings choice for 1080p.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals that the RTX 3060 Ti is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the i7-12700KF’s multi-threaded capability is more than sufficient at lower ones. At 1080p, the gap between Low and Ultra is 86.3 FPS (168.9 down to 82.6), indicating that the GPU is still doing significant work but the CPU can feed it fast enough to keep frame rates high. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838 and 3DMark max-threads score of 9983 support this, showing ample processing headroom.
When resolution jumps from 1080p to 1440p, the Ultra preset drops from 82.6 FPS to 52.2 FPS — a 30.4 FPS decline. This suggests the GPU’s pixel throughput, rated at 133.2 GPixel/s, becomes the dominant constraint. At 4K, the same Ultra preset falls to 27.1 FPS, and even High only manages 36.9 FPS. The RTX 3060 Ti’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are clearly stressed at 3840x2160, as the Low preset (60.5 FPS) is the only one that passes the 60 FPS mark.
The CPU’s role is most visible at 1080p Low, where 168.9 FPS indicates the i7-12700KF can push frame rates far beyond what the GPU can sustain at higher quality settings. The 12-core, 20-thread configuration with a 5.00 GHz boost clock provides the single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3984) needed for high-FPS scenarios. However, at 4K, the GPU’s 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is insufficient for high-quality presets, regardless of CPU capability.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the Intel Core i7-12700KF, the nearest rivals based on average benchmark score are nearly identical in performance. The Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35403, a delta of -0.1%, meaning it is essentially equivalent. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305, a 0.2% difference, and the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428, -0.2% from the i7-12700KF. The Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287, 0.2% higher, confirming that this combo’s CPU performance is interchangeable with several other modern Intel parts.
For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, the nearest rivals show similar GPU-level performance. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 scores 16014, a 0.7% delta, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M scores 16351, -1.4%, and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16361, -1.4%. The AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15862, a 1.7% difference. These alternatives would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minimum at each resolution and settings combination, since the FPS differences would be within a few points of the measured values.
The Verdict
The verdict by resolution is clear: this PC can run Minimum at 1080p and 1440p with playable frame rates, but 4K is only marginal. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear 60 FPS, with Ultra at 82.6 FPS being the highest playable setting. At 2560x1440, High, Medium, and Low all pass the threshold, with High at 70.5 FPS being the best visual option. At 3840x2160, only Low achieves 60.5 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold but with almost no headroom for demanding scenes.
The data indicates that 1440p High is the sweet spot for this combo, offering a 70.5 FPS average that balances quality and performance. For 4K, users must accept Low settings to stay playable, and even then, the 60.5 FPS result is fragile. The RTX 3060 Ti’s position in the 59th percentile of all GPUs and the i7-12700KF’s 85th percentile CPU ranking suggest a system that is well-matched for mainstream gaming but not for high-resolution, high-detail workloads.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the measured average FPS values are: Low at 60.5, Medium at 45.6, High at 36.9, and Ultra at 27.1. The spread from Low to Ultra is 33.4 FPS, showing a steep performance penalty for each quality increment.
At 2560x1440, the results are: Low at 109.9, Medium at 85.8, High at 70.5, and Ultra at 52.2. The drop from Low to Ultra is 57.7 FPS, but all except Ultra remain above 60.
At 1920x1080, the values are: Low at 168.9, Medium at 131.4, High at 111.2, and Ultra at 82.6. The difference between Low and Ultra is 86.3 FPS, with every preset staying comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold.
No minimum or maximum FPS values were recorded in the data, so only average frame rates are available for analysis. The lack of min/max data means frame time consistency cannot be assessed, but the averages provide a reliable baseline for each configuration.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K with High settings?*
A: No. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 36.9, well below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Only the Low preset at 4K achieves 60.5 FPS.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p?
A: High is the best choice at 2560x1440, delivering 70.5 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS, while Medium runs at 85.8 FPS and Low at 109.9 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?
A: The Intel Core i7-12700KF has an average benchmark score of 35365, which is within 0.2% of the Intel Core i7-13700T (35403) and Intel Core i5-13600T (35305). Performance differences in Minimum would be negligible.
Q: Is the RTX 3060 Ti similar to the RX 5700 XT?
A: Yes. The RTX 3060 Ti’s average benchmark score is 16129, while the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16361, a delta of -1.4%. Both would produce nearly identical FPS in this game.
Q: What is the maximum FPS achievable at 1080p?
A: The highest measured average FPS is 168.9 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. At Ultra settings, the average drops to 82.6 FPS.
Q: Does the 4K Low preset stay above 60 FPS?
A: Yes, but barely. At 3840x2160 with Low settings, the average FPS is 60.5, which is only 0.5 FPS above the playable threshold.
How This Combo Ranks
This CPU and GPU combination ranks 2600 out of 3712 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the 70th percentile of all tested systems. The ranking reflects that while the i7-12700KF is in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, the RTX 3060 Ti sits in the 59th percentile of all GPUs, pulling the overall combo down. The CPU’s 3DMark max-threads score of 9983 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838 indicate it is not the bottleneck, but the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20349 limits the system’s ability to handle high resolutions and settings. The rank of 2600 out of 3712 suggests that roughly 30% of tested combos perform better, which aligns with the GPU’s mid-tier positioning. For a game like Minimum, this combo is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but falls short of top-tier 4K performance.