Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

81%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
145 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
71 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
94 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
46 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
50 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
25 FPS
10.8ms Frame Time
16ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 35,365
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 25 32 39 50
1440p QHD 46 60 72 94
1080p Full HD 71 93 111 145

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 93
1920x1080 Low 145
1920x1080 Medium 111
1920x1080 Ultra 71
2560x1440 High 60
2560x1440 Low 94
2560x1440 Medium 72
2560x1440 Ultra 46
3840x2160 High 32
3840x2160 Low 50
3840x2160 Medium 39
3840x2160 Ultra 25

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The Intel Core i7-12700KF and Intel Arc B570 combination presents a clear performance profile for Minimum, a 2014 Third-Person Shooter. The data shows this pairing is strongly capable at mainstream resolutions, though 4K gaming remains out of reach. The CPU, with an average benchmark score of 35,365, places in the 85th percentile of all processors, while the GPU’s average score of 20,556 puts it in the 65th percentile of all graphics cards. This indicates a system where the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU, a dynamic that becomes more evident as resolution increases and the graphics card takes on a heavier load. The measured frame rates across all tested settings and resolutions confirm a system that is not bottlenecked by the processor in most scenarios, but the GPU's limits are clearly defined at higher pixel counts.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i7-12700KF provide a context for its processing power. The data shows the CPU's average score is nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-13700T, which has a deltaPct of -0.1, meaning the i7-12700KF is just 0.1% faster. Similarly, the Intel Core i5-13600T is a close competitor, with this chip being a mere 0.2% faster. The Intel Core 5 213PE is also within a 0.2% margin, but in this case, the 213PE is slightly faster. The most direct comparison is with the Intel Core i7-12700K, which has a deltaPct of 0.2, indicating the 12700KF holds a fractional performance lead. In practical terms, anyone with one of these CPUs would experience nearly identical frame rates in Minimum, as the differences are well within the margin of error for gaming benchmarks.

On the graphics side, the Intel Arc B570's closest competitor is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, with a deltaPct of 0.1, meaning the Arc B570 is 0.1% faster. The Intel Arc A750 is also a direct rival, with this B570 model holding a 0.1% advantage. Interestingly, the data also lists the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and AMD Radeon R9 M390X as near neighbors, with deltaPcts of 0.4 and -0.5 respectively. This suggests that the Arc B570's raw compute performance sits in a similar class to these older professional and mobile parts. For a gamer, this means that the B570 will deliver frame rates in Minimum that are essentially indistinguishable from a system using an RTX 3070 Mobile or an Arc A750, though driver-level differences could still manifest in specific game scenarios.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 1080p with the highest settings?*

A: Yes. The measured data shows an average of 71 FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This makes Ultra the best playable setting at this resolution.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?

A: The verdict data indicates that High settings are the most demanding option that stays playable, with an average of 60 FPS at 2560x1440. This exactly meets the playable threshold.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?

A: No. At 3840x2160, even Low settings only produce an average of 50 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The verdict for this resolution lists no playable settings.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700KF is effectively tied with the Intel Core i7-13700T, being only 0.1% faster in average benchmark score. It also holds a 0.2% lead over the Intel Core i7-12700K.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the Intel Arc A750?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has a very slight performance edge, with a deltaPct of -0.1 when compared to the Arc A750. This indicates the B570 is 0.1% faster in the average benchmark score.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The measured FPS breakdown shows an average of 111 FPS, with a minimum of 95 FPS and a maximum of 128 FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance data for Minimum reveals a clear shift in workload between the CPU and GPU as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the system is likely less GPU-bound, allowing the strong Intel Core i7-12700KF to push high frame rates. The average FPS scales from 145 at Low settings down to 71 at Ultra, a difference of 74 FPS. This wide gap between presets shows that the GPU is still a significant factor, but the CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads are sufficient to prevent it from becoming the primary bottleneck at this resolution. The high minimum FPS of 95 at Medium settings further indicates a stable frame delivery, suggesting the processor can maintain a consistent feed of data to the graphics card.

Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU's role becomes more dominant. The average FPS at Low settings drops to 94, and at High settings, it falls to exactly 60 FPS. The scaling between 1080p Low (145 FPS) and 1440p Low (94 FPS) shows a 35% performance reduction, which is a typical consequence of the increased pixel count. The gap between Low and Ultra settings at this resolution is 48 FPS (94 to 46), which is narrower than at 1080p, indicating that the GPU is now the limiting factor. The CPU's performance headroom becomes less relevant, as the Arc B570's rendering capabilities dictate the final frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is definitively the bottleneck. Even at Low settings, the average FPS is only 50, and performance scales down to 25 FPS at Ultra. The difference between the lowest and highest settings is a 25 FPS spread, which is the smallest relative change of the three resolutions. This compression of performance across presets is a classic sign that the graphics card is fully saturated. The Intel Core i7-12700KF's processing power is more than adequate for the game's logic and draw calls at 4K; the data suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield significant gains, while upgrading the CPU would have little to no effect on frame rates at this resolution.

The Verdict

Based on the measured data, this PC can run Minimum, but its playability is strictly dependent on the chosen resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold with every preset, including Ultra, which achieves an average of 71 FPS. This is the ideal scenario for a smooth experience with maximum visual quality. At 2560x1440, the system still delivers a playable experience, with High settings hitting exactly 60 FPS average. Players can choose between High, Medium, and Low settings for a stable frame rate, but Ultra settings at 46 FPS average will not meet the playable standard.

The verdict is clear for 3840x2160: this combination cannot achieve playable frame rates. The data shows no playable settings at 4K, as even the lowest preset dips to a 50 FPS average. This falls short of the 60 FPS playable threshold. Therefore, a user with this hardware should target 1080p for the best experience or 1440p if they are willing to trade some visual fidelity for a higher resolution. The system is not suitable for 4K gaming in this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following data represents the exact measured frame rates for the Intel Core i7-12700KF and Intel Arc B570 in Minimum.

1920x1080

  • Low: Average 145 FPS. (No min/max data listed)
  • Medium: Average 111 FPS, with a minimum of 95 FPS and a maximum of 128 FPS.
  • High: Average 93 FPS. (No min/max data listed)
  • Ultra: Average 71 FPS. (No min/max data listed)

2560x1440

  • Low: Average 94 FPS. (No min/max data listed)
  • Medium: Average 72 FPS, with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS.
  • High: Average 60 FPS. (No min/max data listed)
  • Ultra: Average 46 FPS. (No min/max data listed)

3840x2160

  • Low: Average 50 FPS. (No min/max data listed)
  • Medium: Average 39 FPS, with a minimum of 33 FPS and a maximum of 44 FPS.
  • High: Average 32 FPS. (No min/max data listed)
  • Ultra: Average 25 FPS. (No min/max data listed)

The data shows a consistent degradation of performance as resolution and quality settings increase. The 1080p Medium preset is the only configuration besides the lower settings that provides a recorded minimum FPS above the 60 FPS threshold, ensuring a consistent experience. At 1440p, the Medium preset's minimum of 61 FPS barely clears the threshold, while the High preset's average of 60 FPS leaves no room for fluctuation.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Minimum, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i7-12700KF and Intel Arc B570 holds the rank of 2984 out of 3712 total combinations. This places it in the lower 20th percentile of all tested systems, which is a surprising result given the strong individual component scores. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking and the GPU's 65th percentile ranking suggest a capable system, but the overall combo rank indicates that many other hardware pairings produce higher frame rates in this specific game.

This low rank could be a consequence of the game's age and its potential sensitivity to certain driver architectures, or it could simply reflect the high performance of the top-tier systems in the database. A rank of 2984 means that roughly 80% of the tested systems perform better in Minimum, which is a significant finding. It suggests that while this PC is perfectly playable at 1080p and 1440p, it is not a top performer for this title. The data implies that a user with a higher-ranked combo would see noticeably higher frame rates, especially at higher resolutions and settings.

Best Settings per Resolution

The optimal settings for this hardware are determined by the most demanding preset that still maintains an average of at least 60 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, which achieves an average of 71 FPS. This is the highest quality preset available and it comfortably clears the playable threshold, offering the full visual experience.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are High, which achieves an average of exactly 60 FPS. This preset provides a good balance between visual fidelity and performance, though it leaves no headroom for demanding scenes.

At 3840x2160, there is no playable setting. All presets, from Low to Ultra, fall below the 60 FPS threshold, with the highest average being 50 FPS at Low settings. Therefore, no recommended settings can be provided for this resolution.