Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

69%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
93 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
47 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
61 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
30 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
29 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
14 FPS
17.5ms Frame Time
26ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 35,365
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 12,928

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 14 22 23 29
1440p QHD 30 36 48 61
1080p Full HD 47 57 70 93

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 57
1920x1080 Low 93
1920x1080 Medium 70
1920x1080 Ultra 47
2560x1440 High 36
2560x1440 Low 61
2560x1440 Medium 48
2560x1440 Ultra 30
3840x2160 High 22
3840x2160 Low 29
3840x2160 Medium 23
3840x2160 Ultra 14

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 580 delivers a highly uneven experience in Minimum, one that is strictly bound by the graphics card’s age. The data shows that this combination is only viable at 1080p and 1440p with reduced settings, while 4K remains entirely out of reach. At 1920x1080, the combo manages a playable 70 FPS on Medium settings, which is the best playable preset available. At 2560x1440, only Low settings clear the 60 FPS threshold, and even then, the margin is razor-thin. The 3840x2160 results are uniformly poor, with no preset reaching even half of the 60 FPS target.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded measurements cover three resolutions and four quality presets each. At 3840x2160, the results are consistently below playability. The Low preset averages 29.3 FPS, which is the highest figure at this resolution. Medium drops to 22.8 FPS, High falls further to 22 FPS, and Ultra collapses to 13.9 FPS. These numbers indicate a severe GPU bottleneck, as even the least demanding settings cannot approach a fluid frame rate.

At 2560x1440, the situation improves but remains limited. The Low preset averages 60.6 FPS, just barely crossing the 60 FPS playability threshold. Medium averages 48.2 FPS, High drops to 35.5 FPS, and Ultra falls to 29.8 FPS. The scaling from Low to Medium represents a drop of 12.4 FPS, while the jump from Medium to High costs another 12.7 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra is smaller, at 5.7 FPS, which suggests that the most demanding settings add less stress than the mid-range transition.

At 1920x1080, the combo performs much better. The Low preset averages 92.7 FPS, which is the highest recorded result across all resolutions and settings. Medium averages 70 FPS, High averages 57.2 FPS, and Ultra averages 47 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 22.7 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High is 12.8 FPS. The drop from High to Ultra is 10.2 FPS. Notably, the difference between 1080p Low and 1440p Low is 32.1 FPS, demonstrating how strongly resolution scaling impacts this GPU.

The data shows that the RX 580’s performance collapses as resolution increases. At 4K, even the Low preset cannot maintain a usable frame rate, and the Ultra preset at 4K produces less than a quarter of the 1080p Low result. The absence of min and max FPS values in the database means that frame time consistency cannot be assessed, but the average figures alone are enough to establish the hardware’s limits.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is the defining metric. At 3840x2160, no preset qualifies. The closest is Low at 29.3 FPS, which is 30.7 FPS short of the target. As a result, the database records no playable settings for 4K.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset is the only playable option, averaging 60.6 FPS. This is just 0.6 FPS above the threshold, leaving virtually no headroom for demanding scenes. The Medium preset at 48.2 FPS is 11.8 FPS below the threshold, so it cannot be recommended for consistent gameplay.

At 1920x1080, the Medium preset is the best playable option, averaging 70 FPS. This provides 10 FPS of headroom over the 60 FPS target. The High preset at 57.2 FPS is 2.8 FPS short, making it a borderline case that fails the strict threshold. The Low preset at 92.7 FPS is fully playable but leaves significant performance unused. For users prioritizing visual quality at 1080p, Medium is the clear ceiling for this hardware combination.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate that the AMD Radeon RX 580 is the dominant performance limiter in this pairing. The Intel Core i7-12700KF is a high-end processor with strong synthetic scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838 and a single-core score of 4071. Its PassMark multi-thread score of 34092 places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. However, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 8813 and its 53rd percentile ranking show that it is a mid-range part from an older generation.

The resolution scaling in the measured FPS data confirms the GPU bottleneck. Moving from 1080p Low to 1440p Low reduces the average FPS from 92.7 to 60.6, a 34.6 percent drop. Moving from 1440p Low to 4K Low reduces the average further to 29.3, another 51.7 percent drop. These large declines are characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario, where the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames but the graphics card cannot keep up with the increasing pixel count.

The preset scaling within each resolution also points to the GPU as the constraint. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 45.7 FPS, while at 1440p the same comparison yields a 30.8 FPS gap. At 4K, the gap narrows to 15.4 FPS, which is a classic sign that the GPU is saturated even at Low settings. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the frame rate would remain relatively flat across resolutions, but the data shows the opposite.

The CPU’s role is therefore to ensure that the GPU can reach its maximum potential. The i7-12700KF’s high single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 1043 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2255, means it will not hold back the RX 580 in a game like Minimum, which is a third-person shooter from 2014. The CPU’s 12 cores and 20 threads are far beyond what this title requires, so all observed frame rate drops are attributable to the graphics card.

The Verdict

This PC can run Minimum, but only under specific conditions. At 1920x1080, the combo clears the 60 FPS threshold on Low and Medium presets. The Medium preset, averaging 70 FPS, is the best playable configuration at this resolution. The High preset falls short at 57.2 FPS, and Ultra drops to 47 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the system is barely playable. The Low preset averages 60.6 FPS, which passes the threshold, but the margin is negligible. Any demanding scene or extended play session could push the average below 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 48.2 FPS is not playable by the database’s standard.

At 3840x2160, the system cannot run the game at a playable frame rate. The best result, Low at 29.3 FPS, is less than half of the target. The verdict is therefore conditional: the system is suitable for 1080p gaming with medium settings and for 1440p gaming only with the lowest settings. For 4K, this hardware combination is not viable.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Intel Core i7-12700KF sits very close to several other processors. The Intel Core i7-13700T has an average score of 35403, which is 0.1 percent lower than the i7-12700KF’s 35365. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305, 0.2 percent higher. The Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428, 0.2 percent lower, and the Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287, 0.2 percent higher. These differences are within one percent, meaning any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minimum when paired with the same GPU.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 580’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, which scores 12940, 0.1 percent lower. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12986, 0.4 percent lower. The AMD Radeon 740M scores 12870, 0.5 percent higher, and the AMD FirePro W5100 scores 12847, 0.6 percent higher. All four alternatives are within one percent of the RX 580’s average score of 12928, so gameplay performance would be effectively indistinguishable. Users with a GTX 1660 SUPER or an RTX 3050 Ti Mobile should expect the same playable settings and frame rates at each resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i7-12700KF and the AMD Radeon RX 580 ranks 3375 out of 3712 tested combos in the database. This places it in the lower portion of the overall distribution, roughly in the 9th percentile. The ranking reflects the GPU’s limitations rather than the CPU’s capabilities. The i7-12700KF alone sits in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the RX 580 sits in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs. The pairing of a high-end modern processor with a mid-range 2017 graphics card results in a system that is heavily imbalanced, with the GPU dragging down the overall standing.

The rank also indicates that most other tested combinations deliver better performance in Minimum. The 337 other combos ranked below this one would be expected to perform worse, likely featuring even older or weaker graphics hardware. The practical takeaway is that this combo is sufficient for 1080p Medium play and 1440p Low play, but it is far from a high-performance configuration. Users seeking higher settings or higher resolutions would need to upgrade the GPU, as the CPU has substantial headroom for more capable graphics hardware.