Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 47 | 65 | 73 | 96 |
| 1440p QHD | 91 | 116 | 139 | 177 |
| 1080p Full HD | 136 | 179 | 214 | 277 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 sits at rank 868 out of 3,712 tested combos for Minimum. This places the pairing in the top 23.4% of all tested systems, a strong position for a game from 2014. The combination is clearly capable of handling the title with authority, given that the 60 FPS playability threshold is met or exceeded across almost every resolution and settings combination tested.
The CPU itself holds an 84th percentile ranking against all CPUs in the database, while the GPU sits at an 81st percentile against all GPUs. When broken down, the i7-12700K's average benchmark score is 35,287, landing it within a razor-thin margin of its nearest rivals — the Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35,305 (only 0.1% higher), the i7-12700KF scores 35,365 (0.2% higher), and the i7-13700T scores 35,403 (0.3% higher). These deltas are negligible in real-world gaming, meaning the i7-12700K is effectively performance-identical to several other mid-range and upper-mid-range Intel parts.
On the GPU side, the RTX 4070's average benchmark score of 37,648 is also tightly clustered with its rivals. The NVIDIA Tesla P4 comes within 0.1% (37,628), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is 0.4% behind (37,507), and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 trails by 1.3% (37,157). Interestingly, the RTX 4080 Mobile actually scores 1.3% higher (38,135), indicating that a laptop part can outpace this desktop GPU in raw synthetic benchmarks — though the measured FPS data for Minimum shows the desktop RTX 4070 performing exceptionally well in actual gameplay.
The overall rank of 868 is driven more by the GPU's strong showing than the CPU's, as the i7-12700K is a 2021 part while the RTX 4070 arrived in 2023. The combination is well-balanced for this title, with no obvious bottleneck dragging down the final rank.
CPU and GPU Roles
The FPS scaling across resolutions reveals a clear pattern: the GPU is the dominant constraint at higher resolutions, while the CPU remains largely untaxed. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces 276.8 FPS. Dropping to 2560x1440 Low yields 177 FPS — a 36.1% reduction. At 3840x2160 Low, the frame rate falls to 96 FPS, another 45.8% drop from the 1440p figure. This steep decline as resolution climbs points squarely at the GPU as the limiting factor; the CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads are far beyond what this game needs.
The settings scaling tells the same story. At 3840x2160, moving from Low (96 FPS) to Medium (72.5 FPS) costs 24.5% performance. High drops to 64.5 FPS, and Ultra collapses to 47.4 FPS — a 50.6% reduction from Low to Ultra. At 2560x1440, the same Low-to-Ultra gap spans 177 FPS down to 91.1 FPS, a 48.5% reduction. At 1920x1080, Low delivers 276.8 FPS while Ultra manages 135.9 FPS, a 50.9% drop. The consistency of this ~50% penalty across all three resolutions indicates that settings changes impact GPU workload uniformly, with no resolution-dependent CPU bottleneck emerging.
The CPU's 3DMark scores reinforce this: 9,276 in the 16-thread test and 9,979 at max threads show strong multi-threading, but the single-thread score of 1,043 and 2-thread score of 2,065 are more relevant for a game from 2014. Minimum was released in June 2014, before multi-core gaming became standard, so the i7-12700K's single-core performance — a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,850.5 — is more than sufficient. The GPU's raw compute (29.15 TFLOPS FP32) and memory bandwidth (504.2 GB/s) are the specs that matter for maintaining high frame rates at 4K, and the data confirms this.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, this combo is overwhelmingly fast. Low settings produce 276.8 FPS average, Medium 213.8 FPS, High 178.5 FPS, and Ultra 135.9 FPS. Every preset clears the 60 FPS threshold by a massive margin — even Ultra delivers more than double the playability target. The jump from Low to Medium costs 63 FPS, Medium to High another 35.3 FPS, and High to Ultra 42.6 FPS. The scaling is smooth and predictable, with no sudden cliffs suggesting a CPU limitation.
Moving to 2560x1440, the numbers remain high but the curve steepens. Low hits 177 FPS, Medium 138.6 FPS, High 116 FPS, and Ultra 91.1 FPS. The Low-to-Ultra drop of 85.9 FPS is proportionally similar to 1080p, confirming that the GPU is still the primary driver. All four presets remain far above 60 FPS, with Ultra still exceeding the threshold by 31.1 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes meaningfully. Low delivers 96 FPS, Medium 72.5 FPS, and High 64.5 FPS — all above the 60 FPS target. However, Ultra falls to 47.4 FPS, a 26.4% shortfall below the playability threshold. The High-to-Ultra gap of 17.1 FPS is the largest settings penalty at any resolution, suggesting that Ultra at 4K pushes the GPU's shading units (5,888) and ROPs (64) to their practical limits. The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory at 504.2 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient, but the sheer pixel throughput at 3840x2160 — 158.4 GPixel/s — is maxed out under Ultra settings.
No minimum or maximum FPS values were recorded in the measured data, so only average frame rates are available for analysis. The absence of frame-time variance data means the analysis relies solely on these averages, which are consistently high enough to indicate smooth gameplay across all playable presets.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K resolution?*
A: Yes, at 4K the combo achieves 96 FPS on Low, 72.5 FPS on Medium, and 64.5 FPS on High — all above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra drops to 47.4 FPS, which is below the playable target.
Q: What is the best playable settings preset at 1440p?
A: Ultra settings deliver 91.1 FPS at 2560x1440, which is the highest preset that remains above 60 FPS. In fact, all four presets at 1440p clear the 60 FPS bar, with Low reaching 177 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?
A: The Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35,287 on average, which is within 0.4% of the Intel Core i5-13600T (35,305), Intel Core i7-12700KF (35,365), Intel Core i7-13700T (35,403), and Intel Core 5 213PE (35,428). These differences are effectively imperceptible in gaming.
Q: Is the RTX 4070 a bottleneck at 1080p?
A: No. At 1920x1080, even Ultra settings produce 135.9 FPS, and Low reaches 276.8 FPS. The GPU is never the limiting factor at this resolution; the frame rates are so high that any bottleneck would be elsewhere in the system.
Q: What is the performance gap between High and Ultra at 4K?
A: At 3840x2160, High averages 64.5 FPS while Ultra drops to 47.4 FPS — a 17.1 FPS difference, or roughly 26.5% lower performance. This is the largest settings penalty observed in the entire dataset.
Q: How does this combo rank against all tested systems?
A: The combo ranks 868th out of 3,712 tested combinations, placing it in the top 23.4% of all systems in the database for this game.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest CPU rivals to the Intel Core i7-12700K are all within a 0.4% performance delta. The Intel Core i5-13600T (35,305 average score, -0.1% delta) would behave nearly identically in Minimum, as would the Intel Core i7-12700KF (35,365, -0.2%), Intel Core i7-13700T (35,403, -0.3%), and Intel Core 5 213PE (35,428, -0.4%). Any of these CPUs paired with the RTX 4070 would produce virtually indistinguishable frame rates in this title, given that the game is GPU-bound at higher resolutions and the CPU is far beyond its requirements.
On the GPU side, the nearest rivals to the RTX 4070 are more varied. The NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37,628 average score, +0.1% delta) would offer essentially the same performance, though it is a data-center part not typically found in gaming PCs. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37,507, +0.4%) would trail by a negligible margin, while the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (37,157, +1.3%) would be slightly slower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (38,135, -1.3%) actually outperforms the desktop RTX 4070 by a small margin in synthetic benchmarks, though its power characteristics and thermal constraints in a laptop chassis could affect sustained gaming performance. For Minimum, any of these GPUs paired with a strong CPU would deliver playable frame rates at most settings, with the RTX 4070 being the best all-around choice due to its desktop-oriented design and 12 GB of GDDR6X memory.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the best playable preset is Ultra, delivering 135.9 FPS average. This is the highest settings level available and it clears the 60 FPS threshold by 75.9 FPS. There is no reason to lower settings at this resolution; even the most demanding preset runs at more than double the playability target.
At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is also Ultra, with an average of 91.1 FPS. This exceeds the 60 FPS requirement by 31.1 FPS, leaving a comfortable margin for frame-time spikes or demanding scenes. The gap between High (116 FPS) and Ultra (91.1 FPS) is 24.9 FPS, but both are well above playable.
At 3840x2160, the best playable preset is High, averaging 64.5 FPS. This is just 4.5 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold, so there is limited headroom. Low (96 FPS) and Medium (72.5 FPS) also qualify as playable, but High offers the best visual quality while staying above the line. Ultra is not recommended at 4K, as its 47.4 FPS average falls 12.6 FPS below the target.
The Verdict
This PC can absolutely run Minimum. The verdict data confirms playable performance at every resolution tested, with the exception of one specific preset. At 1920x1080, all four settings presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — clear the 60 FPS bar, with Ultra hitting 135.9 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same is true: all four presets are playable, with Ultra reaching 91.1 FPS. At 3840x2160, three of four presets are playable — Low (96 FPS), Medium (72.5 FPS), and High (64.5 FPS) — while Ultra falls short at 47.4 FPS.
For players targeting 1080p or 1440p, there is no scenario where this combo struggles. The only caveat is 4K Ultra, which requires dropping to High settings to maintain 60 FPS. Given that Minimum is a 2014 third-person shooter, the visual difference between High and Ultra at 4K is likely subtle, making this a minor trade-off. The overall combo rank of 868 out of 3,712 puts this system in the top quartile of all tested configurations, and the 81st percentile GPU ranking suggests it will handle even more demanding modern titles with adjustments. For this specific game, the i7-12700K + RTX 4070 is a decisively capable pairing.