Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

31%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
178 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
88 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
117 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
58 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
63 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
29 FPS
8.8ms Frame Time
13ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 2,254
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 17,083

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 29 39 49 63
1440p QHD 58 71 87 117
1080p Full HD 88 114 133 178

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 114
1920x1080 Low 178
1920x1080 Medium 133
1920x1080 Ultra 88
2560x1440 High 71
2560x1440 Low 117
2560x1440 Medium 87
2560x1440 Ultra 58
3840x2160 High 39
3840x2160 Low 63
3840x2160 Medium 49
3840x2160 Ultra 29

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The Intel Core i5-9400 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT presents a compelling case study for a 2014 third-person shooter. The recorded data for this combination shows a system that scales predictably across resolutions, with the GPU taking on increasing importance as pixel count rises. The benchmark results indicate that this pairing is capable of delivering smooth gameplay at most settings, though the highest visual fidelity at 4K remains out of reach.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system is overwhelmingly capable. The Low preset produces an average of 177.7 FPS, while Medium delivers 133.4 FPS. High settings yield 113.6 FPS, and even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 88.2 FPS. These numbers show that at 1080p, every graphical setting is not only playable but offers a substantial margin above the 60 FPS threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance profile remains strong but begins to show the strain of additional pixels. The Low preset averages 116.9 FPS, a significant drop from 1080p but still excellent. Medium settings produce 86.9 FPS, while High averages 71.2 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 58.4 FPS, which sits just below the playable threshold of 60 FPS. This indicates that at 1440p, players must choose between High settings for a comfortable experience or Ultra for maximum visuals at a slight performance cost.

At 3840x2160, the data reveals a sharp decline in performance. The Low preset is the only setting that clears the 60 FPS bar, averaging 63.3 FPS. Medium averages 48.5 FPS, High drops to 39.4 FPS, and Ultra falls to 29.3 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows the GPU being pushed to its limits, with the difference between Low and Ultra at 4K representing a performance gap of more than double. The data suggests that 4K gaming with this hardware is reserved for lower fidelity settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU and GPU each have nearby rivals in the database that help contextualize their performance. The Intel Core i5-9400 sits at the 47th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2254. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-1068NG7, which scores 2259, a delta of -0.2 percent. The Intel Core i7-10710U scores 2248, a 0.3 percent difference, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 scores 2246, a 0.4 percent delta. The Intel Core i3-10305 scores 2264, representing a -0.4 percent difference. These figures show that the i5-9400 is clustered tightly with several mobile and desktop chips, all within a fraction of a percent of each other. For this game, any of these CPUs would likely produce nearly identical frame rates, as the performance differences are negligible.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT performs at the 60th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17083. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690, which scores 17037, a 0.3 percent delta. The AMD Radeon HD 7970M scores 17019, a 0.4 percent difference, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 scores 17208, a -0.7 percent delta. The NVIDIA Tesla M4 scores 16932, a 0.9 percent difference. These comparisons reveal an interesting mix of older and newer hardware. The RTX 3070, despite being a more modern and generally faster card, scores only 0.7 percent higher in the aggregate benchmark. This suggests that for this specific game title, the RX 7600 XT holds its own against a card that is typically considered in a higher performance class.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data across resolutions reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU. At 1920x1080, the system is likely more CPU-bound at lower settings. The jump from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a performance difference of 89.5 FPS (from 177.7 down to 88.2), but even at Ultra, the frame rate remains well above 60 FPS. This indicates that the i5-9400 is providing enough processing power to feed the GPU adequately, and the GPU is the limiting factor as settings increase.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows the GPU taking on more responsibility. At Low settings, the frame rate drops from 177.7 to 116.9 FPS, a reduction of about 34 percent. At Ultra settings, the drop is from 88.2 to 58.4 FPS, a reduction of about 34 percent as well. This consistent percentage drop across settings suggests that resolution scaling affects the GPU uniformly, while the CPU's role remains constant.

The transition to 3840x2160 amplifies the GPU's dominance. At Low settings, the frame rate falls from 116.9 at 1440p to 63.3 at 4K, a 46 percent reduction. At Ultra, it falls from 58.4 to 29.3, a 50 percent reduction. These larger percentage drops indicate that at 4K, the RX 7600 XT is the primary bottleneck, and the CPU's performance becomes less relevant. The data implies that players with this combo should prioritize GPU settings at higher resolutions, while at 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to handle any preset without becoming a limiting factor.

The Verdict

Can this PC run the game? The answer depends entirely on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears 60 FPS on every preset. The Ultra settings average 88.2 FPS, which provides a substantial cushion above the playable threshold. At this resolution, players can enable maximum graphical fidelity without any concern for performance.

At 2560x1440, the system remains highly capable but with one caveat. The High preset averages 71.2 FPS, comfortably above 60 FPS. The Medium preset averages 86.9 FPS, and Low averages 116.9 FPS. However, the Ultra preset drops to 58.4 FPS, which falls just short of the playable threshold. Players at 1440p who want to use Ultra settings will experience slightly sub-60 FPS performance, but the High preset offers a clear path to smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is more restrictive. Only the Low preset, averaging 63.3 FPS, clears the 60 FPS bar. Medium averages 48.5 FPS, High averages 39.4 FPS, and Ultra averages 29.3 FPS. The data indicates that 4K gaming with this hardware requires a significant compromise in visual quality. The system can run the game at 4K, but only at the lowest settings. For players who prioritize resolution over fidelity, this combo delivers a playable experience. For those who want high or ultra settings at 4K, the performance is insufficient.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU combo?

A: The recorded data shows that 1920x1080 is the optimal resolution, as all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) average above 60 FPS, with Ultra at 88.2 FPS.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, but only at the Low preset, which averages 63.3 FPS. Medium averages 48.5 FPS, High averages 39.4 FPS, and Ultra averages 29.3 FPS, all below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the RX 7600 XT compare to the RTX 3070 in the database?

A: The RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 17083, while the RTX 3070 scores 17208, a delta of -0.7 percent. The RX 7600 XT is essentially on par with the RTX 3070 in this game's performance profile.

Q: Is the i5-9400 a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data does not indicate a CPU bottleneck at 1080p. The system achieves 177.7 FPS at Low settings and 88.2 FPS at Ultra, suggesting the CPU provides sufficient performance for all presets at this resolution.

Q: What settings should be used at 1440p for a stable 60 FPS?

A: The High preset averages 71.2 FPS, which is the best visual quality that stays above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 58.4 FPS, slightly below the threshold.

Q: Does this combo rank highly among tested systems?

A: The combo ranks 2384 out of 3712 tested combinations, placing it in the middle of the database. This reflects its balanced but not top-tier performance profile.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that maintains an average of 88.2 FPS. This allows players to experience the game with maximum visual effects while retaining a comfortable performance margin.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is the best choice, averaging 71.2 FPS. This provides a significant improvement in visual quality over Medium while staying above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at this resolution falls to 58.4 FPS, making it unsuitable for a consistent 60 FPS experience.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only playable option, averaging 63.3 FPS. This setting delivers a smooth experience at 4K, but with reduced graphical fidelity. Players who prioritize frame rate over resolution should consider dropping to 1440p to unlock higher quality presets.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-9400 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT ranks 2384 out of 3712 tested combos in this game. This places the system near the 36th percentile of all tested configurations, which is a middle-of-the-pack result. The ranking reflects the balanced nature of the hardware: the CPU sits at the 47th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU performs at the 60th percentile among all GPUs. The lower CPU percentile drags the overall ranking down slightly, despite the GPU's above-average position.

The data shows that this combo is more than adequate for the game at 1080p and 1440p, but it is not a top-tier performer. The middle ranking suggests that many other systems will deliver higher frame rates, particularly those with more powerful CPUs. However, for the specific goal of playing this game at 1080p Ultra or 1440p High, the combo delivers a verified, smooth experience. The rank of 2384 out of 3712 indicates that while this system is not exceptional, it is also far from inadequate, offering a dependable mid-range experience for this title.