Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

75%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
156 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
78 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
99 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
52 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
56 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
26 FPS
10.2ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 49,394
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 15,290

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 26 36 40 56
1440p QHD 52 65 77 99
1080p Full HD 78 98 116 156

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 98
1920x1080 Low 156
1920x1080 Medium 116
1920x1080 Ultra 78
2560x1440 High 65
2560x1440 Low 99
2560x1440 Medium 77
2560x1440 Ultra 52
3840x2160 High 36
3840x2160 Low 56
3840x2160 Medium 40
3840x2160 Ultra 26

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 presents a clear split in performance depending on the target resolution. The data shows a system that can handle high refresh rates at 1080p, remains comfortably playable at 1440p with adjusted settings, but falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K. The following analysis breaks down the recorded measurements for Minimum, a Third-Person Shooter released on 2014-06-25.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers an average of 78.4 FPS. This means the full visual fidelity of the game is achievable at this resolution without dropping below the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the highest preset that stays above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 64.6 FPS. While this clears the threshold, the margin is modest. The data indicates that pushing to Ultra at this resolution results in an average of 52 FPS, which falls short of the target.

At 3840x2160, no settings preset achieves an average of 60 FPS. The closest is the Low preset at 55.6 FPS, but since it does not meet the playable threshold, there is no "best setting" recorded for this resolution in the database.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals how the balance of work shifts between the CPU and GPU. At 1920x1080, the RTX 2060 is able to push frame rates from 97.7 FPS on High to 156 FPS on Low. The jump from Low to Medium is 116.4 FPS, and from Medium to High it is 97.7 FPS. This pattern shows that the GPU is the limiting factor, as reducing graphical load produces significant frame rate gains.

When moving to 2560x1440, the same preset ladder shows a different shape. The Low preset yields 99.3 FPS, Medium drops to 77.2 FPS, and High falls to 64.6 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 22.1 FPS, and between Medium and High is 12.6 FPS. This indicates that the GPU is still the primary constraint, but the CPU begins to hold back the lower presets. The fact that the Low preset at 1440p (99.3 FPS) is nearly identical to the High preset at 1080p (97.7 FPS) suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at these rates, and the GPU is the bottleneck at higher settings.

At 3840x2160, the pattern changes further. The Low preset averages 55.6 FPS, Medium drops to 39.7 FPS, and High falls to 35.6 FPS. The difference between Medium and High is only 4.1 FPS, which is much smaller than the difference between Low and Medium at 15.9 FPS. This compression at the top end suggests that at 4K, the GPU is so heavily loaded that even large reductions in settings yield only modest gains. The CPU, with its 14 cores and 20 threads, has ample headroom at this resolution, as the frame rates are dictated almost entirely by the RTX 2060's rendering capabilities.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database records average frame rates for each resolution and settings combination. Minimum and maximum frame rates were not captured for this configuration, so the analysis relies on the average values.

At 1920x1080:

  • Low: 156 FPS
  • Medium: 116.4 FPS
  • High: 97.7 FPS
  • Ultra: 78.4 FPS

The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decline, with the largest single drop occurring between Low and Medium at 39.6 FPS. The drop from Medium to High is 18.7 FPS, and from High to Ultra is 19.3 FPS. This linear degradation indicates that each settings tier imposes a similar additional load on the GPU.

At 2560x1440:

  • Low: 99.3 FPS
  • Medium: 77.2 FPS
  • High: 64.6 FPS
  • Ultra: 52 FPS

Here, the Low to Medium drop is 22.1 FPS, Medium to High is 12.6 FPS, and High to Ultra is 12.6 FPS. The diminishing returns at higher presets are evident, as the gap between Low and Medium is nearly double the gap between Medium and High.

At 3840x2160:

  • Low: 55.6 FPS
  • Medium: 39.7 FPS
  • High: 35.6 FPS
  • Ultra: 25.5 FPS

The 4K results are the most punishing. The Low to Medium drop is 15.9 FPS, Medium to High is 4.1 FPS, and High to Ultra is 10.1 FPS. The Ultra preset at 25.5 FPS is the lowest recorded value for this configuration, representing a 54.9 FPS deficit compared to the Low preset at 1080p.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 combination ranks 2885 out of 3712 tested combos for Minimum. This places the system in the lower portion of the database, which is consistent with the GPU being an older model. The CPU itself sits in the 90th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 58th percentile against all GPUs. This discrepancy suggests that the CPU is far more capable than the GPU, and the overall combo ranking is dragged down by the graphics card.

The ranking implies that a significant number of other hardware combinations deliver higher average frame rates in this game. However, the recorded performance is still sufficient for playable experiences at 1080p and 1440p, which shows that the combo ranking does not tell the whole story. The data indicates that the RTX 2060 is the component that determines the ceiling for this system in Minimum.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-14600KF are all closely matched in average benchmark score. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 0.3% higher, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 0.4% higher, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 0.8% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores 0.8% lower. These small deltas mean that swapping the CPU for any of these alternatives would result in nearly identical frame rates in Minimum, as the GPU would remain the bottleneck.

The nearest rivals for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 are also tightly clustered. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 matches it with a 0% delta, the AMD Radeon 680M is 0.1% faster, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is 0.6% faster, and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is 0.8% faster. In practical terms, any of these GPUs would produce frame rates within a rounding error of the RTX 2060 in this game. The data suggests that the GTX 580, despite being an older architecture, delivers equivalent performance in the synthetic benchmarks that correlate with this game's behavior.

The Verdict

The question of whether this PC can run Minimum depends entirely on the target resolution. The database verdict is clear:

  • 1920x1080: Playable at all four presets, with the best being Ultra at 78.4 FPS.
  • 2560x1440: Playable at High, Low, and Medium, with the best being High at 64.6 FPS.
  • 3840x2160: Not playable at any preset, as the highest average is 55.6 FPS on Low.

For a 1080p display, this system is fully capable of running the game at maximum settings with a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. For a 1440p display, the High preset is the recommended ceiling, and it clears the threshold by only 4.6 FPS. For 4K, the system cannot reach 60 FPS even at the lowest settings, so users with 4K displays would need to accept reduced frame rates or lower the resolution.

The data shows that this is a viable 1080p and 1440p gaming setup for Minimum, with the caveat that 1440p Ultra is not achievable at playable frame rates.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 1920x1080?

A: Yes. The recorded average FPS for Ultra at 1920x1080 is 78.4 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 2560x1440?

A: The High preset is the most demanding that stays at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 64.6 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 52 FPS, which does not meet the threshold.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this combination?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest recorded average FPS is 55.6 on the Low preset. None of the four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) reach 60 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF is within 0.8% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, Intel Core Ultra 5 245, and AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 in average benchmark score. This indicates that CPU swaps in this range would have negligible impact on frame rates in this game.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is within 0.8% of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580, AMD Radeon 680M, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, and AMD Radeon RX 7600 in average benchmark score. Performance differences would be minimal in practice.

Q: Which component limits performance at 3840x2160?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The average FPS at 4K ranges from 55.6 on Low to 25.5 on Ultra, while the CPU holds a 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The recorded frame rates are consistent with GPU-bound behavior at this resolution.