Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

66%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
139 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
68 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
89 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
45 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
47 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
23 FPS
10.9ms Frame Time
16ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 49,394
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 9,780

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 23 31 37 47
1440p QHD 45 57 72 89
1080p Full HD 68 92 107 139

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 92
1920x1080 Low 139
1920x1080 Medium 107
1920x1080 Ultra 68
2560x1440 High 57
2560x1440 Low 89
2560x1440 Medium 72
2560x1440 Ultra 45
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Low 47
3840x2160 Medium 37
3840x2160 Ultra 23

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i5-14600KF sits in a tightly contested performance band, with its nearest rivals all landing within a single percentage point of its average benchmark score. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 trails by a negligible 0.3%, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is 0.4% behind. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 posts a 0.8% deficit. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 leads by 0.8%. In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver near-identical frame pacing in Minimum, meaning the choice between them would not meaningfully alter the measured FPS at any resolution or preset.

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 also occupies a crowded neighborhood. The AMD FirePro W5000 is effectively a tie, sitting 0.2% lower in average score. The NVIDIA Quadro M2000M is 0.5% lower, while the NVIDIA Tesla M10 and Tesla C2070 are 0.6% and 0.7% higher, respectively. These deltas are small enough that all four alternatives would produce visually indistinguishable average frame rates in Minimum. The GTX 1070's own percentile ranking of 47 among all GPUs places it in the middle of the pack, so users coming from any of these near-neighbor cards should expect broadly similar behavior.

How This Combo Ranks

The database records this pairing at rank 3087 out of 3712 tested combinations. That places it in the lower quintile of tested systems, roughly in the 17th percentile of all combos. The ranking reflects the combination of a top-decile CPU (the i5-14600KF sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs) with a mid-pack GPU (47th percentile). The CPU is clearly not the limiting factor in this pairing; the GTX 1070's modest standing drags the overall combo down despite the processor's strength. In Minimum, the recorded data shows the GPU carrying the bulk of the performance burden, which is typical for a third-person shooter with a 2014 release date. The combo rank indicates that most tested systems outperform this pairing, but the data also shows the pairing is fully capable of clearing the 60 FPS threshold at 1080p and 1440p under the right settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the pairing delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce an average of 138.9 FPS, Medium hits 106.5 FPS, and High reaches 91.9 FPS. Ultra settles at 68.3 FPS, still comfortably above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The spread from Low to Ultra is roughly 70 FPS, showing that the GTX 1070 has ample headroom at this resolution; even the most demanding preset keeps the frame rate in playable territory.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages compress noticeably. Low settings yield 89.4 FPS, Medium drops to 72.2 FPS, and High falls to 57.2 FPS. Ultra bottoms out at 44.7 FPS. The 1440p data separates the presets into two groups: Low and Medium clear the 60 FPS line, while High and Ultra fall short. The delta between Low and Ultra here is about 45 FPS, a tighter spread than at 1080p, indicating the GPU is beginning to feel the resolution increase.

At 3840x2160, the picture weakens considerably. Low settings average 47 FPS, Medium drops to 36.5 FPS, and High falls to 30.9 FPS. Ultra manages just 23.4 FPS. No preset at 4K reaches the 60 FPS threshold; the best case, Low, still misses it by 13 FPS. The scaling from 1080p Low at 138.9 FPS to 4K Low at 47 FPS represents a 66% reduction in average frame rate, a steep cost for the resolution jump. The recorded data includes no min or max FPS values for any resolution or preset, so the analysis relies solely on average frame rates.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Minimum? The answer depends entirely on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the pairing clears 60 FPS on every preset. The best playable settings at 1080p are Ultra, with an average of 68.3 FPS, which leaves a small but real margin above the playability threshold. Users who prefer higher refresh rates can push well beyond 60 FPS by dropping to High (91.9 FPS), Medium (106.5 FPS), or Low (138.9 FPS).

At 2560x1440, the verdict is conditional. Low and Medium are playable, with Medium being the best playable preset at 72.2 FPS. High (57.2 FPS) and Ultra (44.7 FPS) fall below the 60 FPS line, so those settings are not recommended for a smooth experience. The data clearly shows 1440p Medium as the sweet spot for this pairing: it is the highest-quality preset that still maintains a healthy frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the answer is no. No preset reaches 60 FPS. The best available option, Low, averages 47 FPS, which is 13 FPS short of the playability threshold. Ultra at 23.4 FPS is effectively a slideshow. For 4K play, this GPU is simply outmatched, and the CPU's strength cannot compensate for the pixel throughput demands.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data makes the division of labor clear. At 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom that the GTX 1070 becomes the primary constraint as settings rise. The drop from Low (138.9 FPS) to Ultra (68.3 FPS) is a 51% reduction, driven almost entirely by GPU workload scaling. The i5-14600KF, with its 90th percentile CPU ranking and 14 cores, 20 threads, is not the bottleneck at this resolution; the frame rate scales downward as GPU load increases.

At 1440p, the GPU's role intensifies. The average FPS at Low drops from 138.9 at 1080p to 89.4, a 36% reduction from the same settings. The High preset at 1440p (57.2 FPS) sits just below the 1080p Ultra result (68.3 FPS), showing that resolution scaling costs roughly one preset tier at this quality level. The CPU still has performance to spare, but the GPU's fill rate and bandwidth, 256.3 GB/s on an 8 GB GDDR5 bus, become the deciding factor.

At 4K, the GPU is thoroughly dominant in determining performance. The difference between Low (47 FPS) and Ultra (23.4 FPS) is a 50% reduction, and even the lowest settings cannot reach 60 FPS. The CPU's contribution is largely irrelevant at this resolution; no amount of processor headroom can overcome the GTX 1070's pixel rate of 107.7 GPixel/s and texture rate of 202.0 GTexel/s. The data indicates that for Minimum, the GTX 1070 is the limiting component at every resolution, with the CPU's influence shrinking as resolution grows.

FAQ

Q: Can this pairing run Minimum at 1080p on Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The recorded average FPS at 1080p Ultra is 68.3, which clears the 60 FPS playability threshold by 8.3 FPS.

Q: What is the best playable preset at 2560x1440?

A: Medium is the best playable preset at 1440p, with an average of 72.2 FPS. High (57.2 FPS) and Ultra (44.7 FPS) fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Is 4K playable with this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No. The best 4K result is Low at 47 FPS, which is 13 FPS below the 60 FPS playability threshold. No 4K preset reaches 60 FPS.

Q: How does the GTX 1070 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GTX 1070's average benchmark score is within 0.7% of its four nearest rivals: the AMD FirePro W5000 (0.2% lower), NVIDIA Quadro M2000M (0.5% lower), NVIDIA Tesla M10 (0.6% higher), and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 (0.7% higher).

Q: How much performance drops when moving from 1080p to 4K at Low settings?

A: The average FPS falls from 138.9 at 1080p Low to 47 at 4K Low, a 66% reduction in frame rate.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Minimum at higher resolutions?

A: The GPU becomes increasingly dominant as resolution rises. At 1080p the CPU has ample headroom, but at 4K the GTX 1070's pixel and texture throughput limits performance regardless of the i5-14600KF's capabilities.