Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

88%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
165 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
81 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
106 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
52 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
57 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
28 FPS
9.4ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 49,394
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 37 44 57
1440p QHD 52 68 81 106
1080p Full HD 81 106 126 165

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 106
1920x1080 Low 165
1920x1080 Medium 126
1920x1080 Ultra 81
2560x1440 High 68
2560x1440 Low 106
2560x1440 Medium 81
2560x1440 Ultra 52
3840x2160 High 37
3840x2160 Low 57
3840x2160 Medium 44
3840x2160 Ultra 28

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a clear performance profile for Minimum, a Third-Person Shooter released in 2014. The measured data shows a system that is firmly capable of 60 FPS gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K presents a significant challenge that requires substantial settings compromises. The benchmark results indicate a GPU-bound experience at higher resolutions, with the processor providing ample headroom at lower settings.

Best Settings per Resolution

The data provides specific average FPS for each resolution and preset, allowing for a precise determination of the most demanding settings that maintain at least 60 FPS.

At 3840x2160, no preset achieves the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest average FPS recorded is 57 at Low settings, which falls just short of the target. The Medium preset averages 44 FPS, High averages 37 FPS, and Ultra averages 28 FPS. All four settings at 4K fail to reach the playable threshold, so there is no "best" playable setting at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is the High preset, which achieves an average of 68 FPS. The Medium preset also clears the threshold with an average of 81 FPS, and the Low preset reaches 106 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below the threshold with an average of 52 FPS. The data shows the High preset is the optimal choice at 1440p, as it provides the highest visual quality while still maintaining a 68 FPS average.

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is the Ultra preset, which achieves an average of 81 FPS. The High preset averages 106 FPS, Medium averages 126 FPS, and Low averages 165 FPS. All presets at 1080p clear the 60 FPS threshold, making the Ultra preset the best choice for maximum visual fidelity at this resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions and presets reveals which component is the primary bottleneck for this game.

The data shows a clear pattern of GPU limitation. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra presets is 84 FPS (165 FPS vs 81 FPS). At 2560x1440, the same preset comparison shows a 54 FPS gap (106 FPS vs 52 FPS). At 3840x2160, the gap narrows to 29 FPS (57 FPS vs 28 FPS). This scaling indicates that as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, and the CPU's role diminishes.

The 1080p Low preset result of 165 FPS is particularly telling. This high frame rate suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with a substantial amount of work, and the GPU is the limiting factor even at this lower resolution. The Intel Core i5-14600KF has a high average benchmark score, with a percentile ranking in the 90th for all CPUs, indicating it is a strong processor. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 and Geekbench single-core score of 2445 support this assessment.

The Intel Arc B580's performance, with a percentile ranking in the 68th for all GPUs, suggests it is a mid-range graphics card. The measured FPS data confirms this, as the GPU's performance drops off significantly as resolution increases. At 4K, even the Low preset's 57 FPS average indicates a GPU that is overburdened, while the CPU likely has significant headroom to spare.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across all tested configurations.

3840x2160:

  • Low: 57 FPS average
  • Medium: 44 FPS average, with a minimum of 37 FPS and a maximum of 50 FPS
  • High: 37 FPS average
  • Ultra: 28 FPS average

At this resolution, the system struggles to maintain smooth gameplay. The Medium preset's minimum of 37 FPS indicates noticeable stuttering, and the performance drop from Low to Ultra is substantial at 29 FPS.

2560x1440:

  • Low: 106 FPS average
  • Medium: 81 FPS average, with a minimum of 69 FPS and a maximum of 93 FPS
  • High: 68 FPS average
  • Ultra: 52 FPS average

The 1440p results show a more playable experience. The Medium preset maintains a minimum of 69 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset's 68 FPS average is also playable, but the Ultra preset's 52 FPS average falls below the target.

1920x1080:

  • Low: 165 FPS average
  • Medium: 126 FPS average, with a minimum of 107 FPS and a maximum of 145 FPS
  • High: 106 FPS average
  • Ultra: 81 FPS average

At 1080p, the system excels. All presets maintain averages well above the 60 FPS threshold, and the Medium preset's minimum of 107 FPS indicates a consistently smooth experience. The Ultra preset's 81 FPS average is still highly playable.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank in the game's database provides context for its overall performance. The Intel Core i5-14600KF and Intel Arc B580 combination holds a rank of 2790 out of 3712 tested combos. This places it in the 25th percentile of all tested systems, indicating that it performs better than approximately 75% of other combinations.

This ranking is consistent with the measured FPS results. The combo is capable of high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, but it is not a top-tier performer. The rank reflects the GPU's mid-range positioning, as the CPU is a high-end component that could support a more powerful graphics card. The ranking suggests that this system is a solid mid-range option, capable of handling most games at 1080p and many at 1440p, but it will not compete with high-end systems in demanding titles.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K resolution?*

A: No. The data shows that no preset achieves the 60 FPS playable threshold at 3840x2160. The highest average FPS is 57 at Low settings, which is just below the 60 FPS target. The verdict for 4K lists no playable settings.

Q: What is the best setting to use at 2560x1440?

A: The High preset is the best choice at 1440p. It is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 68 FPS. The Medium preset also provides a higher frame rate at 81 FPS, but High offers better visual quality while still maintaining a comfortable margin above 60 FPS.

Q: What is the best setting to use at 1920x1080?

A: The Ultra preset is the best choice at 1080p, achieving an average of 81 FPS. All four presets at this resolution maintain averages above the 60 FPS threshold, but Ultra provides the highest visual quality while remaining well above the playable target.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The significant FPS drops as resolution increases, from 165 FPS average at 1080p Low to 57 FPS average at 4K Low, point to the graphics card being the limiting component. The CPU's high benchmark scores suggest it has ample headroom.

Q: What are the minimum FPS figures for the Medium preset?

A: The Medium preset has measured minimum FPS values for each resolution. At 3840x2160, the minimum is 37 FPS. At 2560x1440, the minimum is 69 FPS. At 1920x1080, the minimum is 107 FPS.

Q: Does the system have any playable settings at 4K?

A: No. The `verdictByResolution` data for 3840x2160 lists an empty array for `playableSettings`, confirming that no preset at this resolution clears the 60 FPS threshold.

The Verdict

The data provides a clear verdict for this system's ability to run Minimum. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, with all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—clearing the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset's average of 81 FPS confirms that the system can run the game at maximum settings with a comfortable margin for smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the system remains capable, with the High, Medium, and Low presets all achieving averages above 60 FPS. The High preset's 68 FPS average is the best choice for visual quality while maintaining playability. The Ultra preset's 52 FPS average falls short of the target, so it is not recommended at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the system cannot maintain 60 FPS at any preset. The Low preset's 57 FPS average is the closest to the threshold, but it still falls below. The verdict for 4K is that there are no playable settings, meaning the system is not suitable for 4K gaming in Minimum.

The Intel Core i5-14600KF + Intel Arc B580 is a reliable performer at 1080p and 1440p, providing a smooth experience across most settings. The system is not suitable for 4K gaming in this title.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide context for what other hardware would perform similarly.

The Intel Core i5-14600KF's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, with a negligible performance delta of 0.3%. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is also very close, with a delta of 0.4%. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is within 0.8% of the 14600KF's performance. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is 0.8% faster. Any of these CPUs would deliver a very similar level of performance in this game.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B580's closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, which is 0.2% slower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 is 0.6% slower, and the NVIDIA P106-100 is 1% slower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is 0.7% faster. These GPUs would all produce very similar frame rates to the Arc B580 in Minimum, meaning users with any of these cards would see nearly identical performance at each resolution and preset.