Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 25 | 32 | 39 | 50 |
| 1440p QHD | 46 | 60 | 72 | 94 |
| 1080p Full HD | 71 | 93 | 111 | 145 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The Intel Core i5-14600KF and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a highly playable experience for Minimum at 1080p and 1440p, but it falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K across all tested settings. The data shows a clear performance ceiling for this pairing at higher resolutions, making it a solid choice for mainstream gaming displays rather than a 4K powerhouse.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the Intel Arc B570 struggles to maintain playable frame rates. The High preset produces an average of 32 FPS, while the Medium preset improves slightly to 39 FPS with a minimum of 33 FPS and a maximum of 44 FPS. Dropping to Low raises the average to 50 FPS, but the Ultra preset falls to 25 FPS. None of these averages reach the 60 FPS playable threshold, indicating that 4K is not viable for this game with this hardware, regardless of visual fidelity choices.
Stepping down to 2560x1440 reveals a much more favorable situation. The Low preset delivers an average of 94 FPS, which is well above the playable mark. The Medium preset averages 72 FPS, with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even during demanding scenes. The High preset hits exactly 60 FPS on average, which meets the playable threshold but leaves no headroom for frame rate dips. The Ultra preset falls to 46 FPS, which is not playable. This resolution offers a good balance, with three out of four presets clearing the 60 FPS bar.
At 1920x1080, the combination performs admirably across the board. The Low preset achieves an impressive 145 FPS average, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Medium preset averages 111 FPS, with a minimum of 95 FPS and a maximum of 128 FPS, providing a consistently fluid experience. The High preset delivers 93 FPS on average, while even the demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 71 FPS. All four presets at 1080p are comfortably playable, with the Ultra preset offering the best visual quality while still staying above the 60 FPS threshold.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data indicates that the Intel Arc B570 is the primary performance limiter at higher resolutions, while the Intel Core i5-14600KF has ample headroom to feed the GPU. The scaling from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 shows a significant drop in performance across all settings, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. For instance, the High preset falls from 93 FPS at 1080p to 60 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of roughly one-third. This pattern suggests that the GPU's rendering capabilities, rather than the CPU's processing power, dictate the frame rate at these resolutions.
The transition from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 further reinforces this analysis. The High preset drops from 60 FPS to 32 FPS, and the Medium preset falls from 72 FPS to 39 FPS. These substantial decreases indicate that the Arc B570's memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s and its 10 GB of GDDR6 memory are insufficient to maintain performance at 4K. The CPU, with its 14 cores and 20 threads, is not the bottleneck here; the data shows that the GPU's pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s cannot keep up with the demands of 4K rendering.
At 1080p, the CPU and GPU roles are more balanced. The high frame rates, particularly the 145 FPS average at Low settings, suggest that the CPU can keep the GPU well-fed. However, the drop from 111 FPS at Medium to 71 FPS at Ultra indicates that the GPU still carries the primary load for visual effects. The i5-14600KF's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4594, ensures that it does not introduce a bottleneck at lower resolutions, allowing the Arc B570 to operate near its full potential.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K resolution?*
A: No. The verdictByResolution data shows no playable settings at 3840x2160. The highest average FPS at 4K is 50 FPS on the Low preset, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?
A: The High preset is the best playable option at 2560x1440, delivering an average of 60 FPS. The Low and Medium presets also clear the threshold, with averages of 94 FPS and 72 FPS respectively, but High offers the best visual quality among playable options.
Q: Is the Ultra preset playable at 1080p?
A: Yes. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 71 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This makes it the best settings choice for 1080p, providing maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing playability.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its nearest rival in terms of overall GPU performance?
A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, scores 20534, a difference of 0.1%. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, which is -0.1% relative to the B570. These are essentially performance parity results.
Q: What frame rates can I expect with the Medium preset at 1440p?
A: The Medium preset at 2560x1440 averages 72 FPS, with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS. This ensures that the frame rate stays above the playable threshold even during intense gameplay moments.
Q: Does the CPU hold back performance in this game?
A: The data suggests the CPU is not the limiting factor. The Intel Core i5-14600KF ranks in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, and its performance is within 0.8% of rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 7900. The frame rate drops at higher resolutions are consistent with GPU limitations.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the Intel Core i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49394. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is the closest rival with a score of 49228, a delta of 0.3%, meaning the i5-14600KF is slightly faster. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49196, which is 0.4% slower, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995, a 0.8% difference. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores 49796, which is -0.8% relative to the i5-14600KF, making it marginally faster. Any of these processors would deliver nearly identical performance in Minimum, as the game is clearly GPU-bound at higher resolutions.
On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B570 has an average score of 20556. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20534, a 0.1% difference, making them functionally equivalent. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, which is -0.1% relative to the B570, meaning the A750 is slightly faster but within the margin of error. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, a 0.4% difference, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, which is -0.5% relative to the B570. Users with any of these GPUs can expect similar frame rates in Minimum at the same resolutions and settings.
The Verdict
This PC can run Minimum effectively at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440, but not at 3840x2160. At 1080p, all four presets are playable, with the Ultra preset providing the best experience at an average of 71 FPS. At 1440p, the High, Low, and Medium presets all clear the 60 FPS threshold, with High being the recommended choice for the best balance of visuals and performance, hitting exactly 60 FPS on average. For 4K, there are no playable settings, as even the Low preset only manages 50 FPS on average. The playable threshold is 60 FPS, and the data shows this combination is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming sessions.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i5-14600KF and Intel Arc B570 ranks 2984th out of 3712 tested combos for Minimum. This places it in the lower portion of the overall ranking, which is consistent with the measured FPS data showing a lack of 4K capability. However, the ranking does not tell the whole story; the combination is highly capable at more common resolutions like 1080p and 1440p. The 90th percentile CPU ranking and 65th percentile GPU ranking suggest that while the individual components are respectable, this specific pairing is not optimized for the highest-end 4K workloads that some other tested combos can handle. For gamers targeting 1080p or 1440p, this rank is less relevant than the direct FPS measurements, which show a thoroughly enjoyable experience. The data confirms that this is a mainstream-oriented build that excels at standard resolutions, but it is outclassed in the 4K arena by higher-ranked combinations.