Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

76%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
214 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
105 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
138 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
68 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
74 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
36 FPS
7.3ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 49,394
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 15,852

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 36 48 57 74
1440p QHD 68 89 106 138
1080p Full HD 105 137 164 214

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 137
1920x1080 Low 214
1920x1080 Medium 164
1920x1080 Ultra 105
2560x1440 High 89
2560x1440 Low 138
2560x1440 Medium 106
2560x1440 Ultra 68
3840x2160 High 48
3840x2160 Low 74
3840x2160 Medium 57
3840x2160 Ultra 36

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 delivers a strong showing in Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter. Across the three tested resolutions, the combination demonstrates clear headroom for high-refresh-rate play at 1080p, remains comfortably playable at 1440p, and only struggles at 4K with the most demanding presets. The data indicates that this is a well-balanced pairing where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU's substantial multicore throughput ensures consistent frame delivery.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured performance data for this combo reveals a clear pattern of diminishing returns as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional frame rates across all settings. The Low preset produces an average of 214 FPS, which represents the absolute ceiling for this pairing at this resolution. Moving up to Medium, the average drops to 164 FPS, with a minimum of 139 FPS and a maximum of 188 FPS. The High preset sustains an average of 137 FPS, while the Ultra preset still manages a very respectable 105 FPS average. None of these numbers approach the 60 FPS playable threshold, meaning the system has massive headroom even at the most demanding settings.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably but remains robust. The Low preset delivers an average of 138 FPS, which is still more than double the playable threshold. Medium settings produce an average of 106 FPS, with a minimum of 90 FPS and a maximum of 121 FPS, showing consistent frame pacing. High settings drop to an average of 89 FPS, and Ultra settings settle at 68 FPS. The Ultra figure is notable because it remains above the 60 FPS threshold, although it does not leave much margin for demanding scenes. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 70 FPS, indicating that the visual fidelity settings have a significant impact on the GPU workload.

The 3840x2160 results tell a more constrained story. The Low preset yields an average of 74 FPS, which clears the playable threshold but with limited headroom. Medium settings reduce the average to 57 FPS, with a minimum of 48 FPS and a maximum of 65 FPS, placing it below the 60 FPS target. High settings drop further to an average of 48 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to an average of 36 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra at 4K is 38 FPS, which is a smaller absolute delta than at lower resolutions but represents a much larger relative performance penalty. The data shows that 4K is only viable with the Low preset for this combination.

CPU and GPU Roles

Analyzing the scaling between resolutions and presets reveals how the workload shifts between the Intel Core i5-14600KF and the AMD Radeon RX 7700. At 1920x1080, the CPU's role is significant. The i5-14600KF, with its 14 cores and 20 threads, provides ample processing power. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32544 and single-core score of 4594 place it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, ensuring that it never becomes the limiting factor at this resolution. The GPU, which ranks in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, is capable of pushing out those high frame rates, but the CPU must keep up with the draw calls and game logic. The fact that the Low preset hits 214 FPS suggests the CPU can handle even the most frame-heavy scenarios at 1080p.

As the resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU's workload grows substantially. The pixel count increases by roughly 1.78 times compared to 1080p, and the measured frame rates reflect this. The Low preset drops from 214 FPS to 138 FPS, a 35.5% reduction, while the Ultra preset drops from 105 FPS to 68 FPS, a 35.2% reduction. These proportional drops indicate that the GPU is now the primary driver of performance, with the CPU's role becoming less critical. The i5-14600KF's benchmark scores, including a Passmark multithread score of 38697 and a Geekbench multicore score of 17085, suggest it has far more headroom than the GPU requires at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The pixel count quadruples compared to 1080p, and the measured performance shows a dramatic decline. The Low preset falls to 74 FPS, which is a 65.4% reduction from the 1080p Low result. The Ultra preset falls to 36 FPS, a 65.7% reduction. These near-identical percentage drops across all presets confirm that the Radeon RX 7700's rendering throughput is the limiting factor. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient, but its raw compute power, measured at 25.18 TFLOPS FP32, is simply not enough to maintain high frame rates at 4K with demanding settings. The CPU, by contrast, has plenty of spare capacity; its average benchmark score of 49394 places it just 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Minimum at 60 FPS on a 1080p monitor?*

A: Yes, absolutely. The data shows that at 1920x1080, every preset — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — delivers an average frame rate well above the 60 FPS threshold. The lowest average among these is 105 FPS on Ultra settings, so there is substantial headroom for consistent 60 FPS gameplay.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gaming with this combo?

A: The Ultra preset is the best choice at 2560x1440, as it delivers an average of 68 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. This is the most visually demanding setting that remains playable, with High (89 FPS), Medium (106 FPS), and Low (138 FPS) all also exceeding the threshold.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with the Intel Core i5-14600KF and AMD Radeon RX 7700?

A: Only with the Low preset. At 3840x2160, the Low preset produces an average of 74 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. However, Medium settings drop to 57 FPS, High to 48 FPS, and Ultra to 36 FPS, all of which fall below the playable target.

*Q: How does this combo compare to other tested configurations in Minimum?*

A: The combo ranks 1717 out of 3712 tested combinations, placing it in the upper half of all systems. This ranking reflects its strong performance at 1080p and 1440p, while the 4K results pull the overall rank down due to the GPU's limitations at that resolution.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at any resolution?

A: The data does not indicate a CPU bottleneck. At 1080p, the frame rates are high, but the CPU's benchmark scores — including a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32544 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4273 — suggest it has ample headroom. At 1440p and 4K, the performance scaling aligns with GPU workload increases, confirming the GPU is the limiting factor.

Q: What frame rates can I expect with Medium settings at 1440p?

A: The measured data shows an average of 106 FPS at 2560x1440 with Medium settings, with a minimum of 90 FPS and a maximum of 121 FPS. This provides a smooth experience with minimal frame drops, well above the 60 FPS threshold.

The Verdict

The verdict from the measured data is clear: this system can run Minimum with high-quality settings at most resolutions. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra delivering an average of 105 FPS. This makes the combination excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors up to 144Hz. At 2560x1440, all four presets also remain above 60 FPS, with Ultra at 68 FPS being the most demanding option that still achieves the target. The system is fully playable at this resolution, though the margin above 60 FPS is narrower on Ultra.

The 4K resolution tells a different story. The verdictByResolution data indicates that only the Low preset is playable at 3840x2160, delivering an average of 74 FPS. Medium (57 FPS), High (48 FPS), and Ultra (36 FPS) all fall below the playable threshold. Therefore, for 4K gaming, users must accept the Low preset or reduce the resolution. Overall, this combination is a strong performer for Minimum at 1080p and 1440p, but it is not suited for high-fidelity 4K gameplay.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, as it provides an average of 105 FPS while delivering the highest visual quality. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, and the 45 FPS margin over the threshold ensures smooth gameplay even in demanding scenes.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is again the optimal selection, with an average of 68 FPS. This remains above the 60 FPS target, though the margin is only 8 FPS. For users who prefer a more consistent frame rate with more headroom, the High preset at 89 FPS offers a safer alternative without a significant visual downgrade.

For 3840x2160, the only playable option is the Low preset, which delivers an average of 74 FPS. The Medium preset at 57 FPS is just below the threshold, and the High and Ultra presets at 48 FPS and 36 FPS, respectively, are not viable for 60 FPS gameplay. Users targeting 4K should stick with Low settings or consider lowering the resolution to 1440p for better visual fidelity.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-14600KF and AMD Radeon RX 7700 combination ranks 1717 out of 3712 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the 46th percentile of all systems tested. This ranking reflects a balanced performance profile: the combo excels at 1080p and 1440p, where it delivers frame rates far above the playable threshold, but its 4K performance is limited by the GPU. The CPU itself is a top-tier component, ranking in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49394. This places it just 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245. The GPU, meanwhile, ranks in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15852, putting it 1.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060.

The ranking of 1717 out of 3712 suggests that while this system is not at the very top of the leaderboard, it is comfortably above the median. The data indicates that the CPU's strength ensures no bottlenecking, and the GPU's performance is sufficient for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and solid 60 FPS gameplay at 1440p. The weaker 4K results are the primary reason the combo does not rank higher, as many other tested systems with more powerful GPUs can handle Ultra settings at that resolution. For the target use case of 1080p and 1440p gaming, this combination offers a compelling balance of performance and capability.