Minimum

The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT presents a compelling case for running Minimum, a Third-Person Shooter released on 2014-06-25. The measured data shows this combination achieves playable frame rates at all three tested resolutions, though the margin of comfort varies drastically. At 1920x1080, performance is overwhelmingly high, with even the Ultra preset delivering an average of 125.6 FPS, well beyond the 60 FPS playable threshold. Moving to 2560x1440, the combo still excels, with Ultra settings averaging 83.5 FPS. The 3840x2160 resolution is where the system begins to show its limits, as the Ultra preset dips to 46.4 FPS, falling below the playable threshold, while Medium settings hold at 70.8 FPS. The data indicates a powerful, well-balanced configuration that is more than sufficient for high-refresh-rate gaming at lower resolutions, but requires settings adjustments at 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset at 1920x1080 that stays above 60 FPS?

A: The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 achieves an average of 125.6 FPS, making it the most demanding setting that remains comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data shows all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at this resolution.

Q: Is this combo capable of running the game at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but not at the highest settings. At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 87.6 FPS and Medium averages 70.8 FPS, both clearing the 60 FPS threshold. However, High (59.1 FPS) and Ultra (46.4 FPS) fall below the playable threshold.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49394, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228) and 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196). It trails the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 by 0.8%.

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to other graphics cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT sits in the 85th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 48477. It is 1.5% faster than the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile and 2.5% faster than the Intel Arc A550M, but trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti by 3%.

Q: What is the highest FPS recorded for this system?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 258.7, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low settings preset. This is more than four times the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How does the performance scale from 1080p to 1440p?

A: Scaling from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the Ultra preset drops from 125.6 FPS to 83.5 FPS, a reduction of 33.5%. The Low preset drops from 258.7 FPS to 166 FPS, a reduction of 35.8%.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the nearest rivals for both components helps contextualize what other hardware would deliver similar gameplay experiences. The CPU's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, which has an average score of 49228, a mere 0.3% below the i5-14600KF's 49394. This means a system with the Ryzen 9 7900 would likely produce nearly identical frame rates in Minimum, as the CPU is not the bottleneck at these resolutions. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196) and Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48995) are also within 0.8% of the i5's score, indicating they would behave almost indistinguishably in this title. On the other end, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores 49796, which is 0.8% higher, suggesting slightly better CPU-bound performance, though the difference is likely imperceptible in practice given the high FPS numbers.

On the GPU side, the situation is more varied. The NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile scores 47743, which is 1.5% lower than the RX 6800 XT's 48477. This mobile-class GPU would deliver slightly lower frame rates, potentially pushing the 4K Ultra preset further below the playable threshold. The Intel Arc A550M scores 49737, 2.5% higher, which might provide a small boost at 4K, potentially making the High preset more comfortable. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957) and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001) are 3% faster, which could make the difference at 3840x2160, where the RX 6800 XT barely misses 60 FPS on High (59.1 FPS). With a 3% improvement, the High preset would likely average around 60.9 FPS, crossing the threshold. These comparisons show that while the RX 6800 XT is strong, a slightly faster GPU could unlock the High preset at 4K, making the system more versatile.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data from Minimum reveals a workload that scales heavily with resolution, indicating the GPU is the primary constraint at higher settings. At 1920x1080, the system produces extremely high frame rates across all presets, from 258.7 FPS on Low to 125.6 FPS on Ultra. This wide spread suggests that even at 1080p, the GPU is the limiting factor, as the CPU is capable of feeding it enough data to reach these high numbers. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4594, ensures it does not bottleneck the GPU at these frame rates.

Moving to 2560x1440, we see the expected GPU-bound scaling. The Low preset drops from 258.7 to 166 FPS (a 35.8% reduction), while Ultra drops from 125.6 to 83.5 FPS (a 33.5% reduction). This consistent scaling across all presets indicates that the GPU is the dominant factor, with the CPU maintaining its ability to keep up. The i5-14600KF's 14 cores and 20 threads, along with its 24 MB of shared L3 cache, provide ample headroom for the game's logic and physics at these resolutions.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's workload increases dramatically, and we see the Ultra preset fall to 46.4 FPS, below the playable threshold. The High preset also struggles at 59.1 FPS, just missing 60. The fact that Medium (70.8 FPS) and Low (87.6 FPS) remain playable confirms that the GPU is the sole bottleneck. If the CPU were limiting performance, we would expect the frame rates to plateau across resolutions, which is not the case. The data shows a clear pattern: the CPU is more than sufficient for this game, and the GPU determines playability, especially at 4K where the gap between Low and Ultra is 41.2 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

In the broader context of all tested systems, this combination of Intel Core i5-14600KF and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT ranks 1172 out of 3712 combos for Minimum. This places it in the top 31.6% of all configurations tested, indicating a strong performer. The rank reflects the system's ability to handle the game at high settings and resolutions, though it is not among the elite configurations. The 3712 total combos include a wide range of hardware, from entry-level to enthusiast, so a rank of 1172 suggests this combo is well above average.

The ranking is likely influenced by the GPU's 85th percentile standing among all GPUs, which is a strong position. The CPU's 90th percentile among all CPUs is even higher, suggesting that the processor is not holding the system back. The combination's rank of 1172 out of 3712 means that roughly 2540 other configurations perform better in this game, likely featuring higher-end GPUs like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, which the data shows is 3% faster than the RX 6800 XT. However, for the vast majority of gamers, a top-third ranking is more than adequate, especially when considering the playable frame rates achieved at 1080p and 1440p.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Minimum across all tested resolutions, but with caveats at 4K. At 1920x1080, the system is overwhelmingly capable, with all settings presets clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold. The Ultra preset delivers 125.6 FPS, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. At 2560x1440, the verdict is equally positive, with Ultra settings averaging 83.5 FPS, providing a smooth experience on standard 1440p displays. The 3840x2160 resolution requires settings management: the Low (87.6 FPS) and Medium (70.8 FPS) presets are playable, but High (59.1 FPS) and Ultra (46.4 FPS) fall short of the 60 FPS threshold. This means a 4K user must choose between Medium settings for a comfortable frame rate or accept sub-60 FPS performance at higher visual fidelity. Overall, the system is a solid choice for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K playable at reduced settings.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is identified as the best settings. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 125.6 FPS. This provides the highest visual quality while still offering more than double the playable threshold, leaving ample headroom for demanding scenes. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again takes the top spot, with an average of 83.5 FPS. This is comfortably above 60 FPS and offers the full visual experience. At 3840x2160, the best settings are Medium, which averages 70.8 FPS. While the High preset is tantalizingly close at 59.1 FPS, it does not meet the 60 FPS requirement, making Medium the most demanding playable option. This configuration balances visual fidelity with performance, ensuring a smooth experience at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the average FPS for each resolution and settings preset combination, as measured by the benchmark data. All values are average FPS, as no minimum or maximum FPS data was recorded for any configuration.

3840x2160 (4K)

• High: 59.1 FPS
• Low: 87.6 FPS
• Medium: 70.8 FPS
• Ultra: 46.4 FPS

2560x1440 (1440p)

• High: 107.6 FPS
• Low: 166 FPS
• Medium: 126.5 FPS
• Ultra: 83.5 FPS

1920x1080 (1080p)

• High: 167.9 FPS
• Low: 258.7 FPS
• Medium: 196.5 FPS
• Ultra: 125.6 FPS

The data reveals a consistent scaling pattern. At 1080p, the system produces exceptional frame rates, with even the Ultra preset exceeding 120 FPS. The 1440p results show a substantial but manageable drop, with the Ultra preset still maintaining 83.5 FPS. At 4K, the performance falls off more sharply, particularly at the High and Ultra settings, where the GPU's limits become apparent. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 41.2 FPS, compared to 133.1 FPS at 1080p, highlighting the GPU's increasing workload at higher resolutions. This breakdown confirms the system's strengths at lower resolutions and its need for settings adjustments at 4K.