Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 28 | 37 | 43 | 54 |
| 1440p QHD | 49 | 66 | 79 | 101 |
| 1080p Full HD | 76 | 99 | 119 | 158 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
Similar Performance Alternatives
The Intel Core i5-14600K sits in a tightly contested performance band. Its average benchmark score of 48618 places it within roughly one percent of four nearby processors. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48698, a mere 0.2 percent higher, making it the closest match in raw compute. The AMD EPYC 4345P trails by 0.3 percent with a score of 48470, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX is 0.7 percent ahead at 48287. On the other side, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995, which is 0.8 percent above the i5-14600K. For gaming workloads that depend on single-thread speed, the i5-14600K's strong Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2064 and Passmark single-thread score of 4270 suggest it will behave almost identically to these rivals in CPU-bound scenarios. The differences are so small that users would likely not notice any performance gap between them in real-world gameplay.
For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, the average benchmark score of 15290 places it in a similarly crowded field. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 matches almost exactly with a score of 15283 and a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Radeon 680M is 0.1 percent behind at 15270, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is 0.6 percent ahead at 15199, and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is 0.8 percent ahead at 15171. What is curious here is that the RTX 2060, despite being a much newer architecture with ray tracing and tensor cores, lands alongside older or integrated solutions in aggregate benchmarks. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 110 and DirectX 12 score of 53 indicate that the card's real-time graphics performance is modest for modern titles. In this game, which is a third-person shooter from 2014, the RTX 2060's 6 GB GDDR6 memory and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient, but the data suggests that users upgrading from a GTX 580 or moving from a Radeon 680M would see similar frame rates at the same settings.
CPU and GPU Roles
The measured FPS data reveals how the balance shifts between the i5-14600K and RTX 2060 depending on resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the system reaches 157.6 FPS on Low settings, which is dramatically higher than the 76.1 FPS on Ultra. This spread of 81.5 FPS across presets indicates that the GPU is the primary limiter at this resolution, as reducing graphical load yields massive gains. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, along with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, are more than capable of feeding the GPU at 1080p. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24491 and Passmark multithread score of 38682 show a processor that will not bottleneck a mid-range GPU in a 2014 title.
Moving to 2560x1440, the same pattern holds but with lower absolute numbers. Low settings produce 100.6 FPS, High produces 65.9 FPS, and Ultra drops to 49 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 51.6 FPS, proportionally similar to 1080p. At 3840x2160, the system struggles more noticeably. Low settings yield 54.1 FPS, Medium 42.9 FPS, High 36.8 FPS, and Ultra just 27.5 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows a steep decline, indicating that the GPU's 1920 shading units and 48 ROPs are overwhelmed by the pixel count. The RTX 2060's pixel rate of 80.64 GPixel/s and texture rate of 201.6 GTexel/s become limiting factors at 4K. The CPU's role diminishes as resolution climbs; at 4K, the data shows that no preset reaches 60 FPS, so the bottleneck is clearly the GPU's raw throughput rather than any processor limitation. The verdict data confirms this: at 2560x1440, three presets are playable, while at 1920x1080, all four are playable, but at 3840x2160, none are.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers its strongest performance. Low settings produce an average of 157.6 FPS, which is well above any 60 FPS threshold and suitable for high-refresh displays. Medium settings drop to 119.3 FPS, still a comfortable margin. High settings maintain 99.3 FPS, and Ultra, the most demanding preset, holds at 76.1 FPS. Every preset at this resolution clears the playable threshold of 60 FPS, with the lowest being Ultra at 76.1 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 51.7 percent reduction in frame rate, a typical cost for maximum visual fidelity.
At 2560x1440, the numbers step down. Low settings average 100.6 FPS, Medium 78.5 FPS, and High 65.9 FPS. Ultra falls to 49 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. This makes Ultra the only non-playable preset at this resolution. The drop from High to Ultra is 16.9 FPS, a 25.6 percent penalty, suggesting that Ultra applies effects that disproportionately tax the GPU. The data shows a clear cutoff: High at 65.9 FPS is the most demanding playable setting.
At 3840x2160, the system cannot maintain 60 FPS on any preset. Low settings average 54.1 FPS, Medium 42.9 FPS, High 36.8 FPS, and Ultra 27.5 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 26.6 FPS, and even the lowest settings fall short of the playable threshold by 5.9 FPS. This resolution is effectively beyond the RTX 2060's capabilities for this game, despite the CPU's ample headroom. The minimum and maximum FPS values are not recorded in the data, so only averages are available for analysis.
How This Combo Ranks
The database places this combination at rank 2854 out of 3712 tested combos for this game. That puts it in the lower 23 percent of all systems tested, which is a notable finding given the hardware involved. The i5-14600K is a top-tier processor, ranking in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 2060 sits in the 58th percentile among all GPUs. The combination of a high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU results in a system that is better than most but far from the top. The rank suggests that many other tested combos, likely those with stronger GPUs, achieve higher frame rates. The fact that this combo cannot run the game at 4K above 60 FPS, while it easily handles 1080p Ultra, indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in the ranking. Systems with similar CPU performance but faster GPUs would rank higher, while systems with weaker CPUs but similar GPUs might rank lower due to CPU bottlenecks in other games.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run the game at 1920x1080 with the highest settings?
A: Yes. Ultra settings at 1920x1080 produce an average of 76.1 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?
A: High settings at 2560x1440 average 65.9 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS. Ultra at this resolution drops to 49 FPS and is not playable.
Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?
A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS is 54.1 on Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. All other presets are lower.
Q: How does the RTX 2060 compare to its nearest rivals in aggregate benchmarks?
A: The RTX 2060's average score of 15290 is nearly identical to the GTX 580 at 15283, 0.1 percent ahead of the Radeon 680M at 15270, and 0.6 to 0.8 percent behind the RTX 3050 OEM and RX 7600.
Q: Which component is more important for this game at 1080p?
A: The data shows the GPU is the primary factor. Dropping from Ultra to Low at 1920x1080 increases FPS from 76.1 to 157.6, a clear sign that graphical settings, not CPU speed, dictate performance.
Q: What is the CPU's benchmark percentile ranking?
A: The Intel Core i5-14600K ranks in the 90th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 48618.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 76.1 FPS. This is the highest visual quality available while maintaining playability. At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, averaging 65.9 FPS. Ultra would be preferred for image quality, but its 49 FPS average falls below the threshold. At 3840x2160, no preset achieves 60 FPS. The closest is Low at 54.1 FPS, but since it does not meet the playable threshold, there is no recommended setting. Users at 4K would need to reduce resolution or accept sub-60 FPS performance. The data suggests that 1080p Ultra and 1440p High are the sweet spots for this combination, balancing visual fidelity with smooth frame rates.
The Verdict
This system can run the game at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 with specific settings, but it cannot handle 3840x2160. At 1080p, all four presets are playable, with Ultra achieving 76.1 FPS. This is the ideal resolution for this combo, as it offers the full visual experience without compromise. At 1440p, High settings at 65.9 FPS are the best option; Low and Medium also clear 60 FPS, but Ultra does not. For 4K, the system fails to reach the playable threshold on any preset, with the best result being Low at 54.1 FPS. The verdict is clear: this PC is a capable 1080p machine and a solid 1440p performer for Minimum, but it is not suited for 4K gaming. Users targeting 4K would need a more powerful GPU, as the CPU's performance is not the limiting factor. The i5-14600K provides ample compute headroom, but the RTX 2060's graphics throughput caps the system's potential at higher resolutions.