Minimum

The Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D combination presents a striking imbalance: a mid-range 10-core CPU paired with a flagship-class GPU. Benchmark data for Minimum shows this pairing delivers exceptional frame rates, with the RTX 5090 D clearly dominating the performance profile. The measured results indicate that this system is not merely capable of running the game, but that it obliterates the 60 FPS threshold at every tested resolution and preset, making it a top-tier performer for this title.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU and GPU each have close rivals based on their aggregate benchmark scores, which helps contextualize their standalone performance.

For the Intel Core i5-14400F, the nearest rivals in benchmark scoring are remarkably tight. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U posts an average score of 32233, a mere 0.1% behind the i5-14400F’s 32279. Similarly, the Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32226, just 0.2% lower. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS edges ahead with a score of 32354, representing a 0.2% margin over the i5-14400F. The Intel Core i7-12800H is also very close, with a score of 32121, which is 0.5% lower. In practical terms for Minimum, any of these processors would likely deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance, meaning the choice between them would have minimal observable impact on frame rates.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D has a more polarized set of nearest rivals. The AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT is the closest, with an average score of 76904, placing it 1.1% behind the RTX 5090 D’s 77712. Conversely, the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78940, which is 1.6% ahead, and the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB and 16 GB variants score 79396 and 79605 respectively, putting them 2.1% and 2.4% faster. These deltas are small enough that in a game like Minimum, which is unlikely to stress the GPU to its absolute limit at lower resolutions, the frame rate differences between these cards would be negligible. The RTX 5090 D sits in a performance cluster where users should expect near-identical gameplay experiences.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data across resolutions reveals a classic GPU-bound scenario, with the CPU playing a supporting role. The most telling evidence comes from the scaling between 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 at the same settings. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 396 at 1080p to 277 at 1440p, a 30% reduction. At High settings, the drop is from 276 to 178, a 35% reduction. This significant decline when resolution increases indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck; if the CPU were the limiting factor, the frame rates would remain more stable across resolutions.

The CPU’s role becomes more apparent at the lowest resolution and settings. At 1920x1080 Low, the system hits 396 FPS average. This is an extremely high frame rate, but it is not infinite, suggesting that the CPU is setting an upper ceiling on performance. The RTX 5090 D is powerful enough that at 1080p Low, it could likely produce even more frames if the i5-14400F could feed it data fast enough. However, the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads are more than sufficient for a title from 2014, and it still delivers near-400 FPS, so it is not a weak link in any practical sense.

The scaling from Medium to Ultra presets also points to GPU dominance. At 4K, the average FPS drops from 114 at Medium to 96 at High to 73 at Ultra. This consistent decline as graphical load increases is the signature of a GPU that is working progressively harder. The CPU’s performance is likely constant across these presets, so the entire frame rate change can be attributed to the GPU. The data strongly suggests that for Minimum, the RTX 5090 D is the component that determines playability, while the i5-14400F provides ample headroom without becoming a constraint.

How This Combo Ranks

Among the 3712 combinations tested in Minimum, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D achieves rank 37. This places it in the top 1% of all tested systems, a remarkable position. The percentile data for the individual components supports this: the CPU is in the 83rd percentile versus all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 92nd percentile versus all GPUs. The high combo rank is primarily driven by the GPU’s elite standing, but the CPU’s solid performance ensures it does not drag the system down.

A rank of 37 out of 3712 means that only 36 other hardware configurations produce higher average frame rates in this game. This is an exceptionally strong result. It implies that the system is not just playable, but it is among the fastest setups available for Minimum. The fact that it achieves this rank with a CPU that is not the top-tier flagship indicates that the game’s engine is not heavily CPU-dependent, allowing the RTX 5090 D to fully flex its capabilities. For a user seeking maximum performance in this title, this combo is a top-tier choice, with only a handful of exotic or newer components likely exceeding its output.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: this PC can run Minimum with ease. The verdictByResolution field lists all four settings presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—as playable at every resolution tested. The playable threshold is defined as 60 FPS, and the measured averages are far above this mark in all cases.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the lowest average FPS recorded is 73 at Ultra settings, which clears the 60 FPS threshold by 13 frames. This means a 4K display can be driven at maximum settings with a comfortable margin above the playability floor. At 2560x1440, the performance is even more commanding, with the Ultra preset averaging 136 FPS. At 1920x1080, the system is massively overqualified, with the Ultra preset averaging 210 FPS and the Low preset reaching 396 FPS. The verdict is simple: this combination does not merely run the game; it runs it at the highest settings with high frame rates at 4K, and at exceptionally high frame rates at lower resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across all tested scenarios. Note that min and max FPS values are only provided for the Medium preset at each resolution.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers staggering performance. The Low preset averages 396 FPS. The Medium preset averages 329 FPS, with a minimum of 280 and a maximum of 379. The High preset averages 276 FPS. The Ultra preset still averages 210 FPS. This data shows that even at the highest settings, the frame rate never drops below the 60 FPS threshold, and the minimum observed at Medium is still more than four times the playability floor.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptionally high. The Low preset averages 277 FPS. The Medium preset averages 212 FPS, with a minimum of 180 and a maximum of 244. The High preset averages 178 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 136 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a predictable reduction, but the system still maintains triple-digit averages on every preset.

At 3840x2160, the system still delivers well above playable performance. The Low preset averages 149 FPS. The Medium preset averages 114 FPS, with a minimum of 97 and a maximum of 131. The High preset averages 96 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 73 FPS. Even at 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 13 frames above the 60 FPS threshold, and the minimum FPS at Medium (97) is far above the playable floor, indicating stable performance without significant drops.

Best Settings per Resolution

Based on the requirement to stay at or above 60 FPS, the most demanding preset that qualifies at each resolution is Ultra. The data shows that the system has enough headroom to run the maximum settings everywhere.

At 3840x2160, the best settings are Ultra, which produces an average of 73 FPS. This is a clear pass, as it exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. While the margin is smaller than at lower resolutions, it is still a comfortable cushion that ensures smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are Ultra, yielding an average of 136 FPS. This is more than double the playable threshold, providing a very smooth experience with significant overhead.

At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, with an average of 210 FPS. This is over three times the 60 FPS threshold, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. The system is so powerful at this resolution that it could likely push even higher frame rates if the game’s engine allowed it, but Ultra is the highest preset available.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Minimum at 4K with maximum settings?*

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset is 73 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS is 396, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: This combination ranks 37 out of 3712 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the top 1% of all configurations.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor for performance in this game?

A: The GPU is the dominant factor. The large FPS drops when moving from 1080p to 1440p (e.g., from 396 to 277 at Low settings) indicate the GPU is the primary bottleneck, while the CPU provides sufficient headroom.

Q: What is the minimum FPS observed in the measured data?

A: The lowest minimum FPS recorded is 97, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with the Medium settings preset. This is still well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at all resolutions and presets?

A: Yes. The verdictByResolution data lists all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—as playable at 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160, with all average FPS values exceeding 60.