Minimum

The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is a modern mid-range desktop combination. For the 2014 third-person shooter Minimum, the benchmark data shows this combo delivers a smooth experience at standard resolutions, though 4K requires careful settings selection. The measured frame rates, based on the provided data, indicate a clear performance hierarchy across 1080p, 1440p, and 2160p, with the system comfortably clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold at lower resolutions but hitting its limits at Ultra settings in 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1920x1080?

A: The system can run Ultra settings at 1080p with an average of 99 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that stays well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming?

A: At 3840x2160, only the Low preset (70 FPS average) clears the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 54 FPS, High averages 45 FPS, and Ultra averages 34 FPS, so high-fidelity 4K is not viable.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Core i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32279. It is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (32233, 0.1% faster) and the Intel Core i9-11900 (32226, 0.2% faster), while slightly outperforming the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS (32354, -0.2%) and Intel Core i7-12800H (32121, 0.5%).

Q: Is the RTX 4060's performance close to any older or integrated graphics solutions?

A: The RTX 4060's average score of 17639 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666, -0.2% delta) and the AMD Radeon 780M integrated graphics (17588, 0.3% delta), indicating surprising parity with those parts in this aggregate benchmark.

Q: What is the performance gap between 1080p and 1440p at High settings?

A: At 1080p High, the average FPS is 130. At 1440p High, the average drops to 84 FPS. This represents a significant 46 FPS (approximately 35%) reduction in frame rate when moving up in resolution.

Q: Does the game favor the CPU or GPU more at higher resolutions?

A: The data shows the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases. The frame rate drops steeply from 1080p to 4K at the same settings (e.g., High settings: 130 FPS to 45 FPS), while the CPU's strong single-threaded score of 3055 in Cinebench R23 suggests it is not the limiting factor.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that still achieves an average of at least 60 FPS is listed here.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 99 FPS. This is the maximum visual quality the game offers at this resolution, and it still provides a large margin above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also remains playable, with an average of 64 FPS. While this is close to the 60 FPS line, the measured data confirms it clears the threshold, allowing for maximum settings at this popular middle-ground resolution.

At 3840x2160, the most demanding playable preset is Low, which yields an average of 70 FPS. The Medium preset falls below the threshold with an average of 54 FPS, and High and Ultra are even lower at 45 FPS and 34 FPS, respectively. Therefore, 4K gaming is only possible with significantly reduced visual fidelity.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate a clear shift in system bottleneck as resolution scales. At 1080p, the CPU and GPU work in relative balance, but the GPU's load increases disproportionately at higher resolutions.

Looking at the performance scaling, the RTX 4060's output drops dramatically with resolution. For example, at High settings, the average frame rate falls from 130 FPS at 1080p to 84 FPS at 1440p, and then to 45 FPS at 4K. This steep decline, with 1440p performing 35% worse than 1080p, points to the GPU being the primary constraint as pixel count increases. The Core i5-14400F's robust single-core performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3055 and Geekbench single-core score of 2058, appears sufficient to feed the GPU, even at lower resolutions where the CPU typically has more influence.

The difference between presets further supports this. At 4K, the gap between Low (70 FPS) and Ultra (34 FPS) is a massive 36 FPS, highlighting the GPU's struggle with the increased shading and texture work. Conversely, at 1080p, the same preset shift from Low (202 FPS) to Ultra (99 FPS) shows a large absolute drop but still results in very high frame rates, suggesting the system is less likely to be CPU-bound at these settings. The GPU's role is dominant; the CPU provides a solid foundation, but the RTX 4060 dictates the playable experience at higher resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the aggregate benchmark scores, several other components would perform similarly to the CPU and GPU in this combo.

The Intel Core i5-14400F (avg score 32279) is closely matched by four other processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (32233) and Intel Core i9-11900 (32226) are essentially performance equivalents, being just 0.1% and 0.2% slower, respectively. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS (32354) is 0.2% faster, and the Intel Core i7-12800H (32121) is 0.5% slower. In game, these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates, assuming the GPU is not the limiting factor.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (avg score 17639), the closest rivals are surprisingly older or integrated parts. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666) is 0.2% faster, the AMD Radeon 780M (17588) is 0.3% slower, and both the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551) and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17509) are slightly slower at 0.5% and 0.7% deltas, respectively. While these GPUs have very different feature sets and power requirements, their aggregate benchmark scores suggest they would offer a similar level of raw performance in this game.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is ranked 2000 out of 3712 tested combos for Minimum. This places it in the 54th percentile of all tested systems, meaning it is a slightly above-average performer for this specific title.

This ranking reflects a balanced pairing where the CPU and GPU are well-matched for the game's engine. The system's position in the middle of the pack suggests that while it is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, it offers solid, consistent performance that will handle the game well at standard gaming resolutions, as evidenced by the playable settings at 1080p and 1440p.

The Verdict

The data confirms that this PC can run Minimum effectively. According to the verdict by resolution, the system achieves the playable threshold of 60 FPS at all tested resolutions, but not always at the highest settings.

At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, running Ultra settings with an average of 99 FPS. This is the ideal experience, offering maximum quality with a high frame rate.

At 2560x1440, the system also clears the 60 FPS threshold on Ultra settings, albeit with a lower average of 64 FPS. This is a playable and visually rich experience, though the margin above 60 FPS is smaller.

At 3840x2160, the system is only playable on Low settings, which delivers an average of 70 FPS. While this meets the playable threshold, users seeking higher fidelity at 4K would need to consider a more powerful GPU. The verdict clearly labels 4K Low as the only playable setting. In summary, this is a strong 1080p and capable 1440p machine for Minimum, but 4K gaming requires significant compromises in visual quality.